Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ATNI vs VZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
ATNI vs VZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $395M | $198.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $731M | $138.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $17.17B |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 21.2% |
| Forward P/E | 41.5x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $694M | $200.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $19.05B |
ATNI vs VZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATN International, … (ATNI) | 100 | 43.3 | -56.7% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 82.1 | -17.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATNI vs VZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATNI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.47, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.26x
- Lower D/E ratio (108.3% vs 189.7%)
VZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 5.8%
- Rev growth 2.5%, EPS growth -2.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.3%
- 41.6% 10Y total return vs ATNI's -53.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.5% revenue growth vs ATNI's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 41.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs ATNI's -1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (108.3% vs 189.7%) | |
| Dividends | 5.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs ATNI's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.0% vs VZ's +13.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs ATNI's -0.6%, ROIC 8.0% vs 2.6% |
ATNI vs VZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ATNI vs VZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $138.2B annually — 189.1x ATNI's $731M. VZ is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATNI's -1.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $731M | $138.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $139M | $47.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $17.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $19.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.9% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +21.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.0% | -53.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ATNI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ATNI's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VZ's 8.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $395M | $198.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $972M | $380.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.23x | 11.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 41.47x | 9.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.35x | 7.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.00x | 9.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VZ leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VZ delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-2 for ATNI. ATNI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VZ's 1.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATNI scores 5/9 vs VZ's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.5% | +16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.08x | 1.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $577M | $181.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $19.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $694M | $200.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.91x | 4.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VZ five years ago would be worth $10,277 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,348 for ATNI. Over the past 12 months, ATNI leads with a +65.0% total return vs VZ's +13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VZ at 13.4% vs ATNI's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.9% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.0% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.0% | +45.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.5% | +2.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | +41.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.6% | +13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VZ is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATNI's 0.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VZ currently trades 91.1% from its 52-week high vs ATNI's 84.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | -0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.45 | $51.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.76 | $10.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.4% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 80K | 24.3M |
Analyst Outlook
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ATNI as "Buy" and VZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for VZ (target: $52) vs -14.4% for ATNI (target: $22). For income investors, VZ offers the higher dividend yield at 5.76% vs ATNI's 4.00%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.00 | $51.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +5.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.03 | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
VZ leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATNI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ATNI vs VZ: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATNI or VZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for ATN International, Inc. (ATNI). Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ATN International, Inc. (ATNI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATNI or VZ?
On forward P/E, Verizon Communications Inc.
is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATNI or VZ?
Over the past 5 years, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) delivered a total return of +2. 8%, compared to -36. 5% for ATN International, Inc. (ATNI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VZ returned +41. 6% versus ATNI's -53. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATNI or VZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus ATN International, Inc. 's 0. 47β — meaning ATNI is approximately -538% more volatile than VZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ATN International, Inc. (ATNI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 108% versus 190% for Verizon Communications Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATNI or VZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus -0. 2% for ATN International, Inc. (ATNI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ATN International, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to -2. 2% for Verizon Communications Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VZ leads at 0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATNI or VZ?
Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -2. 0% for ATN International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VZ leads at 21. 2% versus 6. 0% for ATNI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VZ leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATNI or VZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for ATN International, Inc. — 31. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VZ: 9. 5% to $51. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATNI or VZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) offers the highest yield at 5. 8%, versus 4. 0% for ATN International, Inc. (ATNI).
09Is ATNI or VZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 11), 5. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VZ: +41. 6%, ATNI: -53. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATNI and VZ?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATNI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VZ is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 1.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.