Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ATON vs GAIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
ATON vs GAIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $305K | $657M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $130M |
| Gross Margin | — | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 72.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $456M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $14M |
ATON vs GAIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlphaTON Capital Co… (ATON) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Gladstone Investmen… (GAIN) | 100 | 148.9 | +48.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATON vs GAIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATON is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 70.8% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -12.9%
GAIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 10.0%
- Rev growth -12.9%, EPS growth -27.9%
- 319.3% 10Y total return vs ATON's -99.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 70.8% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -12.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 72.7% margin vs ATON's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs ATON's 1.52 | |
| Dividends | 10.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.8% vs ATON's -97.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.5% ROA vs ATON's -64.4%, ROIC 5.3% vs -436.5% |
ATON vs GAIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GAIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GAIN and ATON operate at a comparable scale, with $90M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | $130M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$82M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +72.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +72.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +126.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.4% | +58.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ATON leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $305,451 | $657M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.05x | 9.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GAIN leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GAIN delivers a 21.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-2 for ATON. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GAIN scores 4/9 vs ATON's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | +21.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -64.4% | +10.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $441M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $456M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2472.67x | 1.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GAIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GAIN five years ago would be worth $17,205 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for ATON. Over the past 12 months, GAIN leads with a +30.8% total return vs ATON's -97.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GAIN at 16.1% vs ATON's -84.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -66.2% | +20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.0% | +30.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +56.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +72.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +319.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.0% | +16.1% |
Risk & Volatility
GAIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GAIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATON's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GAIN currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs ATON's 1.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.80 | $17.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.20 | $13.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.9% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 69.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 371K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
GAIN is the only dividend payer here at 10.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +10.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GAIN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATON leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ATON vs GAIN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATON or GAIN a better buy right now?
Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) offers the better valuation at 9.
3x trailing P/E (40. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATON or GAIN?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) delivered a total return of +72.
0%, compared to -100. 0% for AlphaTON Capital Corp. (ATON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GAIN returned +319. 3% versus ATON's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATON or GAIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus AlphaTON Capital Corp. 's 1. 52β — meaning ATON is approximately 183% more volatile than GAIN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ATON or GAIN?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gladstone Investment Corporation grew EPS -27.
9% year-over-year, compared to -54. 6% for AlphaTON Capital Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ATON or GAIN?
Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the more profitable company, earning 72.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for AlphaTON Capital Corp. — meaning it keeps 72. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAIN leads at 72. 7% versus 0. 0% for ATON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GAIN leads at 68. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ATON or GAIN?
In this comparison, GAIN (10.
0% yield) pays a dividend. ATON does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ATON or GAIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 10. 0% yield, +319. 3% 10Y return). AlphaTON Capital Corp. (ATON) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GAIN: +319. 3%, ATON: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ATON and GAIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GAIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. GAIN pays a dividend while ATON does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.