Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ATON vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
ATON vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $305K | $243M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $20M |
ATON vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlphaTON Capital Co… (ATON) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATON vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATON is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 70.8% NII/revenue growth vs TPVG's 36.6%
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 93.3% 10Y total return vs ATON's -99.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 70.8% NII/revenue growth vs TPVG's 36.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs ATON's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs ATON's 1.52 | |
| Dividends | 17.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.3% vs ATON's -97.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.5% ROA vs ATON's -64.4%, ROIC 7.2% vs -436.5% |
ATON vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG and ATON operate at a comparable scale, with $97M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.4% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ATON leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $305,451 | $243M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $691M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.05x | 4.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG delivers a -3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-2 for ATON. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPVG scores 5/9 vs ATON's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -64.4% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2472.67x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TPVG five years ago would be worth $8,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for ATON. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs ATON's -97.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPVG at -1.2% vs ATON's -84.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -66.2% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.0% | +19.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -13.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +93.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.0% | -1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
TPVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATON's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TPVG currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs ATON's 1.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.80 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.20 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.9% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 504K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 17.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +17.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATON leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ATON vs TPVG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATON or TPVG a better buy right now?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATON or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) delivered a total return of -13. 5%, compared to -100. 0% for AlphaTON Capital Corp. (ATON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +93. 3% versus ATON's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATON or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus AlphaTON Capital Corp. 's 1. 52β — meaning ATON is approximately 82% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ATON or TPVG?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -54. 6% for AlphaTON Capital Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ATON or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for AlphaTON Capital Corp. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 0. 0% for ATON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ATON or TPVG?
In this comparison, TPVG (17.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ATON does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ATON or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 17. 1% yield). AlphaTON Capital Corp. (ATON) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +93. 3%, ATON: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ATON and TPVG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. TPVG pays a dividend while ATON does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.