Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ATXG vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Aerospace & Defense
Communication Equipment
ATXG vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Information Technology Services | Aerospace & Defense | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $3M | $25M | $134M | $23M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $299M | $28M | $10M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-4M | $4M | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | 14.7% | 22.8% | 66.3% | 19.8% |
| Operating Margin | -49.4% | -1.4% | 17.4% | -80.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 22.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $22M | $34M | $395K | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $325K | $28M | $29M | $51M |
ATXG vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 48.4 | -51.6% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 212.5 | +112.5% |
| UTStarcom Holdings … (UTSI) | 100 | 33.2 | -66.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATXG vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATXG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
CLPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs UTSI's -69.5%
- 30.7% revenue growth vs UTSI's -30.9%
- 14.8% margin vs ATXG's -202.0%
UTSI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, Low D/E 3.5%, current ratio 2.92x
- Beta 0.20, current ratio 2.92x
- Beta 0.20 vs ATXG's 1.44, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs UTSI's -30.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs ATXG's -202.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs ATXG's 1.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.9% vs ATXG's -53.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs ATXG's -19.4%, ROIC 11.2% vs -2.9% |
ATXG vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ATXG vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories
ATXG leads 1 • UTSI leads 1 • CLPS leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 80.7x ATXG's $4M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATXG's -2.0%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $299M | $28M | $10M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$947,630 | -$1M | $6M | -$8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$4M | $4M | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $0 | $7M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +22.8% | +66.3% | +19.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -49.4% | -1.4% | +17.4% | -80.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -1.3% | +14.8% | -62.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -34.3% | -2.3% | +24.6% | -67.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.9% | +15.3% | +28.8% | -19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -136.8% | +75.8% | +3.0% | -81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ATXG leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $25M | $134M | $23M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $31M | $106M | -$26M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.38x | -3.48x | 32.16x | -5.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 22.45x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 7.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.85x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 0.15x | 5.05x | 2.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.09x | 0.43x | 2.30x | 0.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.56x | — | 22.20x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-32 for ATXG. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATXG's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs UTSI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -31.7% | -6.1% | +7.2% | -13.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.4% | -3.2% | +6.6% | -9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.9% | -7.9% | +11.2% | -32.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.9% | -9.8% | +8.1% | -14.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.03x | 0.59x | 0.01x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22M | $6M | -$28M | -$49M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $324,953 | $28M | $29M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $34M | $394,932 | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.67x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43 for ATXG. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs ATXG's -53.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs ATXG's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | -10.3% | +25.1% | +5.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.4% | -5.4% | +78.9% | -7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | +0.5% | +34.5% | -33.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -69.3% | +49.7% | -50.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -78.5% | +844.4% | -69.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -65.4% | +0.2% | +10.4% | -12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
UTSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UTSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATXG's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UTSI currently trades 85.0% from its 52-week high vs ATXG's 17.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 0.27x | 1.00x | 0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.90 | $1.88 | $17.28 | $2.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.37 | $0.80 | $5.98 | $2.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +17.5% | +48.2% | +68.9% | +85.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 49.8 | 48.6 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 157K | 15K | 256K | 4K |
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $14.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +14.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.13 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATXG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ATXG vs CLPS vs CODA vs UTSI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATXG or CLPS or CODA or UTSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 9% for UTStarcom Holdings Corp. (UTSI). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (22. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATXG or CLPS or CODA or UTSI?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -99. 6% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus ATXG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATXG or CLPS or CODA or UTSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UTStarcom Holdings Corp.
(UTSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus Addentax Group Corp. 's 1. 44β — meaning ATXG is approximately 635% more volatile than UTSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 103% for Addentax Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ATXG or CLPS or CODA or UTSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -30. 9% for UTStarcom Holdings Corp. (UTSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coda Octopus Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ATXG or CLPS or CODA or UTSI?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -121. 8% for Addentax Group Corp. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -67. 4% for UTSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ATXG or CLPS or CODA or UTSI?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ATXG, CODA, UTSI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ATXG or CLPS or CODA or UTSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 14. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, ATXG: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ATXG and CLPS and CODA and UTSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATXG (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and UTSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ATXG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; UTSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while ATXG, CODA, UTSI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.