Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ATXG vs CNET vs CLPS vs CODA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
Information Technology Services
Aerospace & Defense
ATXG vs CNET vs CLPS vs CODA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Advertising Agencies | Information Technology Services | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $3M | $2M | $25M | $134M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $6M | $299M | $28M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-2M | $-4M | $4M |
| Gross Margin | 14.7% | 4.8% | 22.8% | 66.3% |
| Operating Margin | -49.4% | -31.7% | -1.4% | 17.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 22.5x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $122K | $34M | $395K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $325K | $812K | $28M | $29M |
ATXG vs CNET vs CLPS vs CODA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET) | 100 | 3.9 | -96.1% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 48.4 | -51.6% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 212.5 | +112.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATXG vs CNET vs CLPS vs CODA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATXG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
CNET lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- Beta 0.27 vs ATXG's 1.44, lower leverage
- 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs CLPS's -78.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
- Beta 1.00, current ratio 8.86x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs ATXG's -202.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs ATXG's 1.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.9% vs CNET's -55.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs CNET's -21.3%, ROIC 11.2% vs -64.7% |
ATXG vs CNET vs CLPS vs CODA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ATXG vs CNET vs CLPS vs CODA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories
ATXG leads 1 • CLPS leads 1 • CNET leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 80.7x ATXG's $4M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATXG's -2.0%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $6M | $299M | $28M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$947,630 | -$2M | -$1M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$2M | -$4M | $4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | -$2M | $0 | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +4.8% | +22.8% | +66.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -49.4% | -31.7% | -1.4% | +17.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -33.4% | -1.3% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -34.3% | -27.3% | -2.3% | +24.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.9% | -47.0% | +15.3% | +28.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -136.8% | +95.7% | +75.8% | +3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ATXG leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $2M | $25M | $134M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $1M | $31M | $106M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.38x | -0.38x | -3.48x | 32.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 22.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 7.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 17.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 0.12x | 0.15x | 5.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.09x | 0.38x | 0.43x | 2.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.56x | — | — | 22.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATXG's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -31.7% | -60.3% | -6.1% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.4% | -21.3% | -3.2% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.9% | -64.7% | -7.9% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.9% | -73.5% | -9.8% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.03x | 0.03x | 0.59x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22M | -$690,000 | $6M | -$28M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $324,953 | $812,000 | $28M | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $122,000 | $34M | $394,932 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.67x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43 for ATXG. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs CNET's -55.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs ATXG's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | -44.4% | -10.3% | +25.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.4% | -55.1% | -5.4% | +78.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | -89.0% | +0.5% | +34.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -97.9% | -69.3% | +49.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -97.8% | -78.5% | +844.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -65.4% | -52.1% | +0.2% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATXG's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs ATXG's 17.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 1.18x | 0.27x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.90 | $2.78 | $1.88 | $17.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.37 | $0.57 | $0.80 | $5.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +17.5% | +25.2% | +48.2% | +68.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 50.7 | 49.8 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 157K | 11K | 15K | 256K |
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +14.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATXG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ATXG vs CNET vs CLPS vs CODA: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATXG or CNET or CLPS or CODA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (22. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATXG or CNET or CLPS or CODA?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -99. 6% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus ATXG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATXG or CNET or CLPS or CODA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Addentax Group Corp. 's 1. 44β — meaning ATXG is approximately 429% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 103% for Addentax Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ATXG or CNET or CLPS or CODA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coda Octopus Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ATXG or CNET or CLPS or CODA?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -121. 8% for Addentax Group Corp. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -43. 5% for ATXG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ATXG or CNET or CLPS or CODA?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ATXG, CNET, CODA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ATXG or CNET or CLPS or CODA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 14. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, ATXG: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ATXG and CNET and CLPS and CODA?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATXG (Industrials) and CNET (Communication Services) and CLPS (Technology) and CODA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ATXG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while ATXG, CNET, CODA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.