ATXG vs TANH

For growth investors, Tantech Holdings Ltd (TANH) is the stronger pick with -9.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Addentax Group Corp.

(ATXG) delivered a total return of -99. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Tantech Holdings Ltd (TANH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATXG returned -99. 9% versus TANH's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tantech Holdings Ltd (TANH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

91β versus Addentax Group Corp. 's 1. 44β — meaning ATXG is approximately 57% more volatile than TANH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tantech Holdings Ltd (TANH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 103% for Addentax Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tantech Holdings Ltd (TANH) is pulling ahead at -9.

3% versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Addentax Group Corp. grew EPS -19. 7% year-over-year, compared to -107. 1% for Tantech Holdings Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, TANH leads at -8. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Tantech Holdings Ltd (TANH) is the more profitable company, earning -7.

5% net margin versus -121. 8% for Addentax Group Corp. — meaning it keeps -7. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TANH leads at 9. 3% versus -43. 5% for ATXG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TANH leads at 20. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Tantech Holdings Ltd (TANH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

91)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TANH: -100. 0%, ATXG: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ATXG (Industrials) and TANH (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.