Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $412M | $1.96B | $300M | $733M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $52M | $0.00 | — |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-112M | $-290M | $-209M | $-315M |
| Gross Margin | — | 87.2% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -5.8% | — | — |
| Total Debt | $17M | $80M | $25M | $76M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $737M | $78M | $111M |
AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aura Biosciences, I… (AURA) | 100 | 43.3 | -56.7% |
| Ocular Therapeutix,… (OCUL) | 100 | 134.6 | +34.6% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 9.3 | -90.7% |
| Replimune Group, In… (REPL) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AURA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality is your priority.
- 3.9% margin vs OCUL's -5.6%
OCUL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 39.7% 10Y total return vs REPL's -41.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 12.2%, current ratio 15.39x
- Beta 1.25, current ratio 15.39x
- -0.1% vs RCKT's -10.4%
RCKT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 26.4%
- 19.7% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7%
REPL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.84
- Beta 0.84 vs RCKT's 2.06
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.9% margin vs OCUL's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs RCKT's 2.06 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -0.1% vs RCKT's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -48.4% ROA vs REPL's -72.2% |
AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OCUL leads in 2 of 6 categories
RCKT leads 1 • AURA leads 0 • REPL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCKT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OCUL and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $52M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $52M | $0 | — |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$117M | -$295M | -$206M | -$323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$112M | -$290M | -$209M | -$315M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$92M | -$241M | -$180M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +87.2% | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -5.8% | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -5.6% | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -4.6% | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +0.8% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | -5.3% | +25.0% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OCUL and RCKT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $412M | $2.0B | $300M | $733M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $369M | $1.3B | $248M | $698M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.64x | -6.30x | -1.37x | -2.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 37.77x | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.82x | 2.56x | 1.10x | 1.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OCUL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OCUL delivers a -64.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-65 in annual profit, vs $-103 for REPL. RCKT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REPL's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OCUL scores 4/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.1% | -64.6% | -70.8% | -102.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -64.1% | -48.4% | -59.6% | -72.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -72.4% | — | -62.4% | -51.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.8% | -46.0% | -58.1% | -55.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.12x | 0.09x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | -$657M | -$53M | -$35M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $737M | $78M | $111M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $80M | $25M | $76M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -24.63x | -43.58x | -48.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OCUL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OCUL five years ago would be worth $6,309 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, OCUL leads with a -0.1% total return vs RCKT's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OCUL at 11.2% vs RCKT's -50.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.9% | -24.4% | -20.5% | -0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.9% | -0.1% | -10.4% | -10.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.8% | +37.5% | -88.0% | -62.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.7% | -36.9% | -94.2% | -74.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.7% | +39.7% | -91.1% | -41.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.0% | +11.2% | -50.7% | -27.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AURA and REPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCKT's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AURA currently trades 67.2% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 50.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 1.25x | 2.06x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.54 | $16.44 | $5.45 | $13.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.73 | $6.23 | $2.40 | $1.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.2% | +54.4% | +50.5% | +67.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.7 | 49.7 | 31.1 | 63.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 549K | 2.8M | 2.3M | 8.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AURA as "Buy", OCUL as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", REPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 235.6% upside for OCUL (target: $30) vs 57.7% for REPL (target: $14).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $30.00 | $5.00 | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 19 | 19 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OCUL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). RCKT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Aura Biosciences, Inc.
(AURA) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL?
Over the past 5 years, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
(OCUL) delivered a total return of -36. 9%, compared to -94. 2% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OCUL returned +39. 7% versus RCKT's -91. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Replimune Group, Inc.
(REPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning RCKT is approximately 146% more volatile than REPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 18% for Replimune Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 26. 4% year-over-year, compared to -16. 4% for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL?
Aura Biosciences, Inc.
(AURA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -513. 2% for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AURA leads at 0. 0% versus -521. 0% for OCUL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OCUL leads at 87. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Replimune Group, Inc.
(REPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84)). Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (REPL: -41. 4%, RCKT: -91. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AURA and OCUL and RCKT and REPL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.