Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
AURA logo
AURA
OCUL logo
OCUL
RCKT logo
RCKT
REPL logo
REPL
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AURA
Aura Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$412M
5Y Perf.-56.7%
OCUL
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.96B
5Y Perf.+34.6%
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$300M
5Y Perf.-90.7%
REPL
Replimune Group, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$733M
5Y Perf.-69.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+88.8%

AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AURA logoAURA
OCUL logoOCUL
RCKT logoRCKT
REPL logoREPL
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$412M$1.96B$300M$733M$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$52M$0.00$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-112M$-290M$-209M$-315M$57.05B
Gross Margin87.2%60.0%
Operating Margin-5.8%25.9%
Forward P/E14.4x
Total Debt$17M$80M$25M$76M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$60M$737M$78M$111M$343.34B

AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AURA
OCUL
RCKT
REPL
JPM
StockOct 21Jun 26Return
Aura Biosciences, I… (AURA)10043.3-56.7%
Ocular Therapeutix,… (OCUL)100134.6+34.6%
Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT)1009.3-90.7%
Replimune Group, In… (REPL)10030.1-69.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100188.8+88.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. REPL also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
AURA
Aura Biosciences, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

AURA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
OCUL
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

OCUL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 12.2%, current ratio 15.39x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Leader

RCKT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 19.7% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7%
Best for: growth
REPL
Replimune Group, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

REPL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.

  • Beta 0.84, current ratio 7.95x
  • Beta 0.84 vs RCKT's 2.06
Best for: defensive
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs OCUL's 39.7%
  • 20.4% margin vs OCUL's -5.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRCKT logoRCKT19.7% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs OCUL's -5.6%
Stability / SafetyREPL logoREPLBeta 0.84 vs RCKT's 2.06
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)JPM logoJPM+21.8% vs RCKT's -10.4%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs REPL's -72.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs -51.9%

AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AURAAura Biosciences, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

OCULOcular Therapeutix, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.8%$52M
Collaboration revenue
0.2%$128,000
RCKTRocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

REPLReplimune Group, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGREPL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCUL's -5.6%.

MetricAURA logoAURAAura Biosciences,…OCUL logoOCULOcular Therapeuti…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$52M$0$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$117M-$295M-$206M-$323M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$112M-$290M-$209M-$315M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$92M-$241M-$180M-$283M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.2%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-5.8%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.6%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.6%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.1%-5.3%+25.0%+2.5%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — OCUL and RCKT and JPM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricAURA logoAURAAura Biosciences,…OCUL logoOCULOcular Therapeuti…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$412M$2.0B$300M$733M$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$369M$1.3B$248M$698M$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.64x-6.30x-1.37x-2.89x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue37.77x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.82x2.56x1.10x1.72x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
Evenly matched — OCUL and RCKT and JPM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-103 for REPL. RCKT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAURA logoAURAAura Biosciences,…OCUL logoOCULOcular Therapeuti…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-78.1%-64.6%-70.8%-102.7%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-64.1%-48.4%-59.6%-72.2%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-72.4%-62.4%-51.9%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-70.8%-46.0%-58.1%-55.9%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–924125
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x0.12x0.09x0.18x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$42M-$657M-$53M-$35M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$60M$737M$78M$111M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$17M$80M$25M$76M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-24.63x-43.58x-48.62x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs RCKT's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs RCKT's -50.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAURA logoAURAAura Biosciences,…OCUL logoOCULOcular Therapeuti…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+20.9%-24.4%-20.5%-0.2%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-3.9%-0.1%-10.4%-10.2%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-48.8%+37.5%-88.0%-62.1%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-56.7%-36.9%-94.2%-74.4%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-56.7%+39.7%-91.1%-41.4%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-20.0%+11.2%-50.7%-27.7%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — REPL and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

REPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCKT's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 50.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAURA logoAURAAura Biosciences,…OCUL logoOCULOcular Therapeuti…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.68x1.25x2.06x0.84x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.54$16.44$5.45$13.24$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.73$6.23$2.40$1.50$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.2%+54.4%+50.5%+67.1%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10029.749.731.163.459.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded549K2.8M2.3M8.9M7.0M
Evenly matched — REPL and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: AURA as "Buy", OCUL as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", REPL as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 235.6% upside for OCUL (target: $30) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricAURA logoAURAAura Biosciences,…OCUL logoOCULOcular Therapeuti…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00$30.00$5.00$14.00$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts819191561
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AURA vs OCUL vs RCKT vs REPL vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 7% for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aura Biosciences, Inc. (AURA) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -94. 2% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus RCKT's -91. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Replimune Group, Inc.

(REPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning RCKT is approximately 146% more volatile than REPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -18. 7% for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 26. 4% year-over-year, compared to -16. 4% for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -513. 2% for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -521. 0% for OCUL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OCUL leads at 87. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL or JPM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OCUL: 235.

6% to $30. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. AURA, OCUL, RCKT, REPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is AURA or OCUL or RCKT or REPL or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, RCKT: -91. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between AURA and OCUL and RCKT and REPL and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (AURA (Healthcare) and OCUL (Healthcare) and RCKT (Healthcare) and REPL (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AURA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OCUL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while AURA, OCUL, RCKT, REPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.