Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AURE vs ARRY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
AURE vs ARRY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Investment - Banking & Investment Services | Solar |
| Market Cap | $65M | $1.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $640K | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-67M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 22.4% |
| Operating Margin | -11.0% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | 25.3x | 11.6x |
| Total Debt | $181K | $766M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13K | $244M |
AURE vs ARRY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aurelion Inc. (AURE) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 42.6 | -57.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AURE vs ARRY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AURE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.64
- Rev growth 83.6%, EPS growth -5.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 5.9%, current ratio 1.12x
ARRY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -77.7% 10Y total return vs AURE's -98.6%
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 25.3x)
- -5.6% margin vs AURE's -10.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 83.6% NII/revenue growth vs ARRY's 40.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.6% margin vs AURE's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.7% vs AURE's -39.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.4% ROA vs AURE's -104.3%, ROIC 9.0% vs -108.0% |
AURE vs ARRY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARRY leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARRY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 1883.4x AURE's $639,912. ARRY is the more profitable business, keeping -5.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AURE's -10.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $639,912 | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $95M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$67M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +22.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.0% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.7% | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -26.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ARRY leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $65M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $66M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | -11.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.33x | 11.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 102.20x | 0.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 4.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARRY leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARRY delivers a -20.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-21 in annual profit, vs $-149 for AURE. AURE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARRY scores 5/9 vs AURE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -149.1% | -20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -104.3% | -4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -108.0% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -150.2% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 2.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $167,327 | $522M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13,190 | $244M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $180,517 | $766M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARRY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARRY five years ago would be worth $3,204 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $133 for AURE. Over the past 12 months, ARRY leads with a +57.7% total return vs AURE's -39.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARRY at -24.2% vs AURE's -77.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.6% | -16.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.5% | +57.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -56.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -68.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -77.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -77.1% | -24.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AURE and ARRY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AURE is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARRY's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARRY currently trades 66.4% from its 52-week high vs AURE's 15.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 2.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.60 | $12.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.25 | $4.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.6% | +66.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.1 | 57.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 103K | 6.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARRY leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
AURE vs ARRY: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AURE or ARRY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aurelion Inc.
(AURE) is the stronger pick with 83. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 40. 2% for Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY). Analysts rate Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AURE or ARRY?
Over the past 5 years, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) delivered a total return of -68. 0%, compared to -98. 7% for Aurelion Inc. (AURE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARRY returned -77. 7% versus AURE's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AURE or ARRY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aurelion Inc.
(AURE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Array Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 32β — meaning ARRY is approximately 259% more volatile than AURE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aurelion Inc. (AURE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AURE or ARRY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aurelion Inc.
(AURE) is pulling ahead at 83. 6% versus 40. 2% for Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 62. 6% year-over-year, compared to -538. 5% for Aurelion Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AURE or ARRY?
Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 1% net margin versus -1074. 7% for Aurelion Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARRY leads at 6. 6% versus -1101. 2% for AURE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AURE leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AURE or ARRY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for Aurelion Inc. — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — AURE or ARRY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AURE or ARRY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aurelion Inc.
(AURE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64)). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AURE: -98. 6%, ARRY: -77. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AURE and ARRY?
These companies operate in different sectors (AURE (Financial Services) and ARRY (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.