Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$18M
5Y Perf.-22.7%
VZLA
Vizsla Silver Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.+145.0%
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.23B
5Y Perf.+84.8%
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.99B
5Y Perf.+191.7%
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.13B
5Y Perf.+283.2%

AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AUST logoAUST
VZLA logoVZLA
GPOR logoGPOR
EXK logoEXK
HL logoHL
IndustryGoldIndustrial MaterialsOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOther Precious MetalsGold
Market Cap$18M$1.18B$3.23B$2.99B$12.13B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$1.42B$330M$1.57B
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$-16M$594M$-94M$559M
Gross Margin47.8%9.3%50.9%
Operating Margin40.2%-1.7%44.1%
Forward P/E7.0x14.3x19.1x
Total Debt$0.00$0.00$789M$120M$299M
Cash & Equiv.$573K$133M$2M$106M$242M

AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AUST
VZLA
GPOR
EXK
HL
StockMay 22May 26Return
Austin Gold Corp. (AUST)10077.3-22.7%
Vizsla Silver Corp. (VZLA)100245.0+145.0%
Gulfport Energy Cor… (GPOR)100184.8+84.8%
Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK)100291.7+191.7%
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100383.2+283.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GPOR leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Hecla Mining Company is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
The Basic Materials Pick

AUST plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: basic materials exposure
VZLA
Vizsla Silver Corp.
The Basic Materials Pick

VZLA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: basic materials exposure
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
The Income Pick

GPOR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 0.1%
  • Lower P/E (7.0x vs 19.1x)
  • 41.9% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
  • Beta 0.14 vs EXK's 1.71
Best for: income & stability
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, EXK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Growth Play

HL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 7.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
  • 360.6% 10Y total return vs EXK's 182.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 2.72x
  • Beta 1.26, yield 0.1%, current ratio 2.72x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHL logoHL53.0% revenue growth vs VZLA's -245.5%
ValueGPOR logoGPORLower P/E (7.0x vs 19.1x)
Quality / MarginsGPOR logoGPOR41.9% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
Stability / SafetyGPOR logoGPORBeta 0.14 vs EXK's 1.71
DividendsHL logoHL0.1% yield, vs GPOR's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HL logoHL+271.0% vs GPOR's -5.6%
Efficiency (ROA)GPOR logoGPOR19.8% ROA vs AUST's -18.4%, ROIC 14.8% vs -16.0%

AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AUSTAustin Gold Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

VZLAVizsla Silver Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

GPORGulfport Energy Corporation
FY 2025
Natural Gas, Production
79.8%$1.1B
Oil and Condensate
10.1%$134M
Natural gas liquid sales
10.1%$133M
EXKEndeavour Silver Corp.
FY 2024
Concentrate Sales
101.1%$71M
Provisional Pricing Adjustments
-1.1%$-776,000
HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000

AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHLLAGGINGEXK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

HL and VZLA operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. GPOR is the more profitable business, keeping 41.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXK's -28.4%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAUST logoAUSTAustin Gold Corp.VZLA logoVZLAVizsla Silver Cor…GPOR logoGPORGulfport Energy C…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$1.4B$330M$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M-$34M$884M$49M$853M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M-$16M$594M-$94M$559M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M-$45M$362M-$129M$472M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.8%+9.3%+50.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+40.2%-1.7%+44.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+41.9%-28.4%+35.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+25.5%-39.1%+30.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+27.3%+154.0%+57.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+49.9%+11.9%+127.7%-97.5%-160.0%
HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GPOR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.3x trailing earnings, GPOR trades at a 77% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GPOR's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EXK's 76.0x.

MetricAUST logoAUSTAustin Gold Corp.VZLA logoVZLAVizsla Silver Cor…GPOR logoGPORGulfport Energy C…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Market CapShares × price$18M$1.2B$3.2B$3.0B$12.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$18M$1.1B$4.0B$3.0B$12.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-11.08x-159.19x8.32x-78.08x36.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.95x14.34x19.07x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.98x76.02x17.25x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.44x13.72x8.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.16x3.06x1.80x5.07x4.58x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.71x39.11x
GPOR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

GPOR delivers a 32.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-19 for AUST. HL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPOR's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs VZLA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAUST logoAUSTAustin Gold Corp.VZLA logoVZLAVizsla Silver Cor…GPOR logoGPORGulfport Energy C…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-18.6%-3.1%+32.7%-18.4%+22.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-18.4%-3.1%+19.8%-9.2%+16.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-16.0%-7.2%+14.8%+1.5%+15.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-20.2%-7.2%+19.3%+1.6%+16.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933748
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.43x0.25x0.12x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$572,691-$133M$787M$14M$57M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$572,691$133M$2M$106M$242M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$0$789M$120M$299M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense11.16x-39.17x19.04x
HL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,043 for AUST. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs GPOR's -5.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HL at 43.4% vs AUST's 5.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAUST logoAUSTAustin Gold Corp.VZLA logoVZLAVizsla Silver Cor…GPOR logoGPORGulfport Energy C…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.6%-37.9%-13.3%+12.5%-4.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+2.3%+51.1%-5.6%+193.4%+271.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+15.7%+134.9%+96.1%+144.0%+194.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-69.6%+40.6%+145.1%+61.1%+150.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-69.6%+40.6%+145.1%+182.7%+360.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+5.0%+32.9%+25.2%+34.6%+43.4%
HL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GPOR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GPOR is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GPOR currently trades 79.2% from its 52-week high vs AUST's 33.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAUST logoAUSTAustin Gold Corp.VZLA logoVZLAVizsla Silver Cor…GPOR logoGPORGulfport Energy C…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.47x1.34x0.14x1.71x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.92$7.19$225.78$15.15$34.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.15$2.23$160.95$3.14$4.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+33.9%+47.7%+79.2%+67.0%+52.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.851.334.647.646.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded134K7.5M320K9.4M15.4M
GPOR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: VZLA as "Buy", GPOR as "Buy", EXK as "Buy", HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 104.1% upside for VZLA (target: $7) vs 25.6% for EXK (target: $13).

MetricAUST logoAUSTAustin Gold Corp.VZLA logoVZLAVizsla Silver Cor…GPOR logoGPORGulfport Energy C…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.00$242.00$12.75$23.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts581426
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.09$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+10.0%0.0%+0.0%
HL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

HL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GPOR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallHecla Mining Company (HL)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger pick with 53.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vizsla Silver Corp. (VZLA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL?

On trailing P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the cheapest at 8.

3x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL?

Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.

3%, compared to -69. 6% for Austin Gold Corp. (AUST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus AUST's -69. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

14β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 71β — meaning EXK is approximately 1089% more volatile than GPOR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hecla Mining Company (HL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 43% for Gulfport Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is pulling ahead at 53.

0% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HL leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL?

Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

3% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPOR leads at 37. 9% versus 0. 0% for VZLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPOR leads at 70. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) trades at 7.

0x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Hecla Mining Company — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VZLA: 104. 1% to $7. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

14), +145. 1% 10Y return). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GPOR: +145. 1%, EXK: +182. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AUST and VZLA and GPOR and EXK and HL?

These companies operate in different sectors (AUST (Basic Materials) and VZLA (Basic Materials) and GPOR (Energy) and EXK (Basic Materials) and HL (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AUST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VZLA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPOR is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AUST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VZLA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GPOR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 77%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.