Gold
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Other Precious Metals
Gold
AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Industrial Materials | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Other Precious Metals | Gold |
| Market Cap | $18M | $1.18B | $3.23B | $2.99B | $12.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $1.42B | $330M | $1.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-16M | $594M | $-94M | $559M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 47.8% | 9.3% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 40.2% | -1.7% | 44.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 7.0x | 14.3x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 | $789M | $120M | $299M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $573K | $133M | $2M | $106M | $242M |
AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Austin Gold Corp. (AUST) | 100 | 77.3 | -22.7% |
| Vizsla Silver Corp. (VZLA) | 100 | 245.0 | +145.0% |
| Gulfport Energy Cor… (GPOR) | 100 | 184.8 | +84.8% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 291.7 | +191.7% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 383.2 | +283.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AUST plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
VZLA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GPOR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 0.1%
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 19.1x)
- 41.9% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
- Beta 0.14 vs EXK's 1.71
Among these 5 stocks, EXK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 7.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
- 360.6% 10Y total return vs EXK's 182.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 2.72x
- Beta 1.26, yield 0.1%, current ratio 2.72x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs VZLA's -245.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.9% margin vs EXK's -28.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs EXK's 1.71 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield, vs GPOR's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +271.0% vs GPOR's -5.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs AUST's -18.4%, ROIC 14.8% vs -16.0% |
AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HL leads in 4 of 6 categories
GPOR leads 2 • AUST leads 0 • VZLA leads 0 • EXK leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HL and VZLA operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. GPOR is the more profitable business, keeping 41.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXK's -28.4%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $1.4B | $330M | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$34M | $884M | $49M | $853M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$16M | $594M | -$94M | $559M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$45M | $362M | -$129M | $472M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +47.8% | +9.3% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +40.2% | -1.7% | +44.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +41.9% | -28.4% | +35.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +25.5% | -39.1% | +30.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +27.3% | +154.0% | +57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.9% | +11.9% | +127.7% | -97.5% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GPOR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, GPOR trades at a 77% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GPOR's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EXK's 76.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $1.2B | $3.2B | $3.0B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $1.1B | $4.0B | $3.0B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.08x | -159.19x | 8.32x | -78.08x | 36.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 6.95x | 14.34x | 19.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 4.98x | 76.02x | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 2.44x | 13.72x | 8.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.16x | 3.06x | 1.80x | 5.07x | 4.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 11.71x | — | 39.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GPOR delivers a 32.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-19 for AUST. HL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPOR's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs VZLA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.6% | -3.1% | +32.7% | -18.4% | +22.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.4% | -3.1% | +19.8% | -9.2% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.0% | -7.2% | +14.8% | +1.5% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.2% | -7.2% | +19.3% | +1.6% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.43x | 0.25x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$572,691 | -$133M | $787M | $14M | $57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $572,691 | $133M | $2M | $106M | $242M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 | $789M | $120M | $299M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 11.16x | -39.17x | 19.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,043 for AUST. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs GPOR's -5.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HL at 43.4% vs AUST's 5.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.6% | -37.9% | -13.3% | +12.5% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.3% | +51.1% | -5.6% | +193.4% | +271.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.7% | +134.9% | +96.1% | +144.0% | +194.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.6% | +40.6% | +145.1% | +61.1% | +150.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.6% | +40.6% | +145.1% | +182.7% | +360.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.0% | +32.9% | +25.2% | +34.6% | +43.4% |
Risk & Volatility
GPOR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GPOR is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GPOR currently trades 79.2% from its 52-week high vs AUST's 33.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 1.34x | 0.14x | 1.71x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.92 | $7.19 | $225.78 | $15.15 | $34.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.15 | $2.23 | $160.95 | $3.14 | $4.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.9% | +47.7% | +79.2% | +67.0% | +52.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 51.3 | 34.6 | 47.6 | 46.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 134K | 7.5M | 320K | 9.4M | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
HL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VZLA as "Buy", GPOR as "Buy", EXK as "Buy", HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 104.1% upside for VZLA (target: $7) vs 25.6% for EXK (target: $13).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 | $242.00 | $12.75 | $23.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 8 | 14 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.1% | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.09 | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +10.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
HL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GPOR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
AUST vs VZLA vs GPOR vs EXK vs HL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vizsla Silver Corp. (VZLA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL?
On trailing P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the cheapest at 8.
3x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL?
Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.
3%, compared to -69. 6% for Austin Gold Corp. (AUST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus AUST's -69. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
14β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 71β — meaning EXK is approximately 1089% more volatile than GPOR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hecla Mining Company (HL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 43% for Gulfport Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HL leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL?
Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPOR leads at 37. 9% versus 0. 0% for VZLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPOR leads at 70. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) trades at 7.
0x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Hecla Mining Company — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VZLA: 104. 1% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AUST or VZLA or GPOR or EXK or HL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
14), +145. 1% 10Y return). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GPOR: +145. 1%, EXK: +182. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AUST and VZLA and GPOR and EXK and HL?
These companies operate in different sectors (AUST (Basic Materials) and VZLA (Basic Materials) and GPOR (Energy) and EXK (Basic Materials) and HL (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AUST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VZLA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPOR is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.