Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AVGO vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
AVGO vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.03T | $543.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $68.28B | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24.97B | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 67.1% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 40.9% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 37.8x | 103.7x |
| Total Debt | $65.14B | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16.18B | $14.27B |
AVGO vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 1467.4 | +1367.4% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 171.9 | +71.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVGO vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.96, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 23.9%, EPS growth 287.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
- 30.0% 10Y total return vs INTC's 293.1%
INTC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +433.7% vs AVGO's +114.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.9% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (37.8x vs 103.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.6% margin vs INTC's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.96 vs INTC's 2.15 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +433.7% vs AVGO's +114.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.9% ROA vs INTC's -1.6%, ROIC 14.9% vs -0.0% |
AVGO vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AVGO vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO and INTC operate at a comparable scale, with $68.3B and $53.8B in trailing revenue. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INTC's -5.9%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $68.3B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $38.8B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25.0B | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28.9B | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.1% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +40.9% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +42.3% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.5% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.6% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
INTC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, INTC's 49.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVGO's 60.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.03T | $543.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.08T | $575.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 89.61x | -1836.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.77x | 103.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.80x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 60.58x | 49.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 31.72x | 10.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 25.52x | 4.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 75.30x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AVGO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AVGO delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-3 for INTC. INTC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs INTC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.9% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.9% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.9% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.9% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49.0B | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16.2B | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65.1B | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.24x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $98,561 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,665 for INTC. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +433.7% total return vs AVGO's +114.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 90.3% vs INTC's 52.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.2% | +174.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +114.2% | +433.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +589.0% | +251.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +885.6% | +96.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2997.5% | +293.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +90.3% | +52.0% |
Risk & Volatility
AVGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVGO is the less volatile stock with a 1.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INTC's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.96x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $433.38 | $110.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $195.94 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.0 | 79.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 23.4M | 108.6M |
Analyst Outlook
AVGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AVGO as "Buy" and INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.8% upside for AVGO (target: $444) vs -28.7% for INTC (target: $77). AVGO is the only dividend payer here at 0.54% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $443.72 | $77.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 58 | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.30 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% |
AVGO leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INTC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
AVGO vs INTC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVGO or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the stronger pick with 23. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) offers the better valuation at 89. 6x trailing P/E (37. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) a "Buy" — based on 58 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVGO or INTC?
On forward P/E, Broadcom Inc.
is actually cheaper at 37. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVGO or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) delivered a total return of +885. 6%, compared to +96. 7% for Intel Corporation (INTC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +30. 0% versus INTC's +293. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVGO or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 96β versus Intel Corporation's 2. 15β — meaning INTC is approximately 9% more volatile than AVGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intel Corporation (INTC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVGO or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is pulling ahead at 23. 9% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadcom Inc. grew EPS 287. 8% year-over-year, compared to 98. 7% for Intel Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVGO leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVGO or INTC?
Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus -0. 0% for INTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVGO or INTC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) trades at 37. 8x forward P/E versus 103. 7x for Intel Corporation — 66. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVGO: 3. 8% to $443. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVGO or INTC?
In this comparison, AVGO (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. INTC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AVGO or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 5% yield). Intel Corporation (INTC) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVGO: +30. 0%, INTC: +293. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVGO and INTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock. AVGO pays a dividend while INTC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.