Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AVNT vs FUL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
AVNT vs FUL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $3.47B | $3.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.26B | $3.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $82M | $152M |
| Gross Margin | 31.7% | 31.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 10.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.92B | $2.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $511M | $107M |
AVNT vs FUL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avient Corporation (AVNT) | 100 | 152.7 | +52.7% |
| H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) | 100 | 162.0 | +62.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVNT vs FUL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 0.6%, EPS growth -51.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 80.6%, current ratio 1.66x
FUL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 53.2% 10Y total return vs AVNT's 28.8%
- 4.4% margin vs AVNT's 2.5%
- +16.4% vs AVNT's +9.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.6% revenue growth vs FUL's -2.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 12.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.4% margin vs AVNT's 2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs FUL's 1.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs FUL's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.4% vs AVNT's +9.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs AVNT's 1.4%, ROIC 7.8% vs 3.9% |
AVNT vs FUL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AVNT vs FUL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AVNT and FUL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUL and AVNT operate at a comparable scale, with $3.5B and $3.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.4% (FUL) to 2.5% (AVNT). On growth, AVNT holds the edge at +1.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.3B | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $395M | $472M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $82M | $152M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $195M | $121M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.7% | +31.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +3.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | -3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.4% | +122.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AVNT and FUL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.2x trailing earnings, FUL trades at a 48% valuation discount to AVNT's 42.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FUL's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVNT's 12.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.52x | 22.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.39x | 12.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.54x | 9.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 0.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 1.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.80x | 27.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUL delivers a 7.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $3 for AVNT. AVNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.81x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUL's 1.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUL scores 7/9 vs AVNT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.5% | +7.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +7.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +9.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 1.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $511M | $107M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.10x | 2.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AVNT and FUL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUL five years ago would be worth $9,434 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,041 for AVNT. Over the past 12 months, FUL leads with a +16.4% total return vs AVNT's +9.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVNT at 1.9% vs FUL's -1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.2% | +1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.8% | +16.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.8% | -3.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.6% | -5.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.8% | +53.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.9% | -1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVNT and FUL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVNT is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUL's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FUL currently trades 88.8% from its 52-week high vs AVNT's 84.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.85 | $68.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.48 | $48.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.4% | +88.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.6 | 45.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 622K | 570K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AVNT and FUL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AVNT as "Buy" and FUL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.9% upside for AVNT (target: $48) vs 20.3% for FUL (target: $73). For income investors, AVNT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.84% vs FUL's 1.49%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.40 | $73.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.08 | $0.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.8% |
FUL leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency. 5 categories are tied.
AVNT vs FUL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVNT or FUL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Avient Corporation (AVNT) is the stronger pick with 0.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 7% for H. B. Fuller Company (FUL). H. B. Fuller Company (FUL) offers the better valuation at 22. 2x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Avient Corporation (AVNT) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVNT or FUL?
On trailing P/E, H.
B. Fuller Company (FUL) is the cheapest at 22. 2x versus Avient Corporation at 42. 5x. On forward P/E, Avient Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVNT or FUL?
Over the past 5 years, H.
B. Fuller Company (FUL) delivered a total return of -5. 7%, compared to -19. 6% for Avient Corporation (AVNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUL returned +53. 2% versus AVNT's +28. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVNT or FUL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avient Corporation (AVNT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
19β versus H. B. Fuller Company's 1. 20β — meaning FUL is approximately 1% more volatile than AVNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Avient Corporation (AVNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 81% versus 101% for H. B. Fuller Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVNT or FUL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Avient Corporation (AVNT) is pulling ahead at 0.
6% versus -2. 7% for H. B. Fuller Company (FUL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: H. B. Fuller Company grew EPS 19. 6% year-over-year, compared to -51. 6% for Avient Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVNT leads at -1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVNT or FUL?
H.
B. Fuller Company (FUL) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 4% net margin versus 2. 5% for Avient Corporation — meaning it keeps 4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUL leads at 11. 5% versus 6. 2% for AVNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVNT leads at 32. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVNT or FUL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Avient Corporation (AVNT) trades at 12.
4x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for H. B. Fuller Company — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVNT: 27. 9% to $48. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVNT or FUL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Avient Corporation (AVNT) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 5% for H. B. Fuller Company (FUL).
09Is AVNT or FUL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, H.
B. Fuller Company (FUL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUL: +53. 2%, AVNT: +28. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVNT and FUL?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.