Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AVT vs TXN vs ADI vs MCHP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
AVT vs TXN vs ADI vs MCHP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $6.62B | $259.70B | $199.44B | $54.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24.96B | $18.44B | $11.76B | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $214M | $5.37B | $2.71B | $-97M |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | 57.3% | 62.8% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | 35.3% | 29.2% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.2x | 37.8x | 35.8x | 64.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.88B | $15.39B | $8.66B | $5.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $192M | $3.23B | $2.50B | $772M |
AVT vs TXN vs ADI vs MCHP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avnet, Inc. (AVT) | 100 | 296.8 | +196.8% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 240.2 | +140.2% |
| Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | 100 | 361.7 | +261.7% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 211.6 | +111.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVT vs TXN vs ADI vs MCHP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (16.2x vs 64.8x)
TXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 94.6%, current ratio 4.35x
- Beta 1.11, yield 1.9%, current ratio 4.35x
- 29.1% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
ADI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 39.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.8%
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs TXN's 471.6%
- 16.9% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
MCHP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +115.1% vs AVT's +65.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 64.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.1% margin vs MCHP's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs MCHP's 1.70 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs MCHP's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +115.1% vs AVT's +65.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.5% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8% |
AVT vs TXN vs ADI vs MCHP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AVT vs TXN vs ADI vs MCHP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TXN leads in 2 of 6 categories
AVT leads 1 • ADI leads 1 • MCHP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TXN and ADI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVT is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.0B annually — 5.7x MCHP's $4.4B. TXN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, AVT holds the edge at +33.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25.0B | $18.4B | $11.8B | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $781M | $8.1B | $5.4B | $881M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $214M | $5.4B | $2.7B | -$97M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $33M | $3.7B | $4.6B | $820M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +57.3% | +62.8% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +35.3% | +29.2% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +29.1% | +23.0% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +20.2% | +38.8% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.9% | +18.6% | +30.4% | +15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.9% | +32.0% | +116.7% | +164.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.4x trailing earnings, AVT trades at a 67% valuation discount to ADI's 89.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AVT's 12.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MCHP's 57.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.6B | $259.7B | $199.4B | $55.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.3B | $271.9B | $205.6B | $59.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.40x | 52.34x | 89.59x | -9999.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.22x | 37.76x | 35.77x | 64.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 13.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.44x | 33.89x | 41.69x | 57.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.30x | 14.69x | 18.10x | 12.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 16.00x | 6.00x | 7.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.47x | 99.77x | 46.61x | 71.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. ADI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADI scores 8/9 vs MCHP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.3% | +32.5% | +8.0% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +15.5% | +5.6% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +15.8% | +5.4% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +19.0% | +6.5% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.95x | 0.26x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.7B | $12.2B | $6.2B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $192M | $3.2B | $2.5B | $772M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.9B | $15.4B | $8.7B | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.80x | 12.06x | 10.80x | 0.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADI five years ago would be worth $27,077 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,566 for MCHP. Over the past 12 months, MCHP leads with a +115.1% total return vs AVT's +65.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADI at 31.5% vs MCHP's 12.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +64.6% | +62.3% | +49.6% | +56.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.6% | +76.5% | +106.4% | +115.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.0% | +83.5% | +127.5% | +43.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.1% | +65.5% | +170.8% | +45.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.4% | +471.6% | +689.6% | +373.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.0% | +22.4% | +31.5% | +12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TXN and MCHP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXN is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MCHP's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCHP currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs AVT's 95.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.11x | 1.44x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $84.72 | $292.64 | $415.97 | $103.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.25 | $152.73 | $195.69 | $46.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.4% | +97.5% | +98.2% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.9 | 79.6 | 73.1 | 82.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 6.7M | 3.5M | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AVT as "Hold", TXN as "Buy", ADI as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -1.9% upside for AVT (target: $79) vs -14.4% for MCHP (target: $87). For income investors, TXN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.92% vs ADI's 0.95%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $79.33 | $253.71 | $374.42 | $87.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 65 | 54 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +1.9% | +0.9% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 22 | 22 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.30 | $5.48 | $3.87 | $1.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.6% | +0.6% | +1.1% | +0.2% |
TXN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). AVT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AVT vs TXN vs ADI vs MCHP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVT or TXN or ADI or MCHP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Analog Devices, Inc.
(ADI) is the stronger pick with 16. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Avnet, Inc. (AVT) offers the better valuation at 29. 4x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) a "Buy" — based on 65 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVT or TXN or ADI or MCHP?
On trailing P/E, Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) is the cheapest at 29. 4x versus Analog Devices, Inc. at 89. 6x. On forward P/E, Avnet, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVT or TXN or ADI or MCHP?
Over the past 5 years, Analog Devices, Inc.
(ADI) delivered a total return of +170. 8%, compared to +45. 7% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADI returned +689. 6% versus AVT's +132. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVT or TXN or ADI or MCHP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
11β versus Microchip Technology Incorporated's 1. 70β — meaning MCHP is approximately 53% more volatile than TXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVT or TXN or ADI or MCHP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Analog Devices, Inc.
(ADI) is pulling ahead at 16. 9% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Analog Devices, Inc. grew EPS 39. 0% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, ADI leads at -2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVT or TXN or ADI or MCHP?
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the more profitable company, earning 28.
3% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXN leads at 34. 1% versus 2. 8% for AVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADI leads at 61. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVT or TXN or ADI or MCHP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) trades at 16. 2x forward P/E versus 64. 8x for Microchip Technology Incorporated — 48. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVT: -1. 9% to $79. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVT or TXN or ADI or MCHP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 0. 9% for Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI).
09Is AVT or TXN or ADI or MCHP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
11), 1. 9% yield, +471. 6% 10Y return). Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) carries a higher beta of 1. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +471. 6%, MCHP: +373. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVT and TXN and ADI and MCHP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TXN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ADI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.