Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AVX vs KLIC vs COHU vs ONTO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
AVX vs KLIC vs COHU vs ONTO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $213K | $5.14B | $2.23B | $13.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $768M | $481M | $1.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $3M | $-56M | $106M |
| Gross Margin | 38.8% | 48.0% | 25.7% | 48.8% |
| Operating Margin | -10.6% | 6.9% | -10.6% | 10.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 37.4x | 89.2x | 38.7x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $39M | $359M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $490K | $216M | $227M | $346M |
AVX vs KLIC vs COHU vs ONTO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avax One Technology… (AVX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Kulicke and Soffa I… (KLIC) | 100 | 180.6 | +80.6% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 134.1 | +34.1% |
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 391.0 | +291.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVX vs KLIC vs COHU vs ONTO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 317.0%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 317.0% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4%
KLIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.87, yield 1.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.87, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 4.79x
- Lower P/E (37.4x vs 89.2x)
- Beta 1.87 vs ONTO's 2.66
COHU is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.13, current ratio 6.88x
ONTO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 14.3% 10Y total return vs KLIC's 8.1%
- 10.3% margin vs AVX's -14.4%
- 4.7% ROA vs AVX's -117.7%, ROIC 5.7% vs -98.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 317.0% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (37.4x vs 89.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs AVX's -14.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.87 vs ONTO's 2.66 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +220.8% vs AVX's -96.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs AVX's -117.7%, ROIC 5.7% vs -98.0% |
AVX vs KLIC vs COHU vs ONTO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AVX vs KLIC vs COHU vs ONTO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ONTO leads in 3 of 6 categories
KLIC leads 1 • AVX leads 0 • COHU leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ONTO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ONTO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 764.1x AVX's $1M. ONTO is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVX's -14.4%. On growth, KLIC holds the edge at +49.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $768M | $481M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $61M | -$11M | $158M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $3M | -$56M | $106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $11M | $32M | $239M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +48.0% | +25.7% | +48.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | +6.9% | -10.6% | +10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.4% | +0.4% | -11.5% | +10.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | +1.4% | +6.6% | +23.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +49.8% | +29.3% | +9.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.6% | +141.5% | +60.6% | -48.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AVX and ONTO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 98.6x trailing earnings, ONTO trades at a 99% valuation discount to KLIC's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ONTO's 68.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KLIC's 336.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $212,616 | $5.1B | $2.2B | $13.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $5.0B | $2.4B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 9999.00x | -29.86x | 98.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.41x | 89.21x | 38.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 336.22x | — | 68.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.13x | 7.85x | 4.93x | 13.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 6.36x | 2.82x | 6.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.30x | 207.83x | 45.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ONTO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ONTO delivers a 5.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-160 for AVX. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COHU's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KLIC scores 7/9 vs AVX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -159.9% | +0.4% | -6.8% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -117.7% | +0.3% | -4.9% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -98.0% | -0.3% | -5.7% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -117.1% | -0.3% | -5.9% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.05x | 0.46x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $995,040 | -$177M | $132M | -$329M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $489,868 | $216M | $227M | $346M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $39M | $359M | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.20x | 4872.17x | -168.82x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ONTO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ONTO five years ago would be worth $41,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for AVX. Over the past 12 months, KLIC leads with a +220.8% total return vs AVX's -96.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ONTO at 47.1% vs AVX's -97.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.6% | +103.4% | +92.9% | +65.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.9% | +220.8% | +199.7% | +118.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +115.0% | +40.7% | +218.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +101.0% | +22.2% | +312.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +814.1% | +330.2% | +1431.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -97.3% | +29.1% | +12.1% | +47.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KLIC and COHU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KLIC is the less volatile stock with a 1.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ONTO's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COHU currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs AVX's 2.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.35x | 1.87x | 2.13x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.26 | $107.01 | $50.68 | $315.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.44 | $29.91 | $15.34 | $85.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.7% | +91.7% | +93.7% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.8 | 77.0 | 75.5 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 452K | 617K | 953K | 832K |
Analyst Outlook
KLIC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KLIC as "Buy", COHU as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for ONTO (target: $308) vs -36.3% for KLIC (target: $63). KLIC is the only dividend payer here at 1.04% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $62.50 | $49.75 | $308.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 14 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | +0.3% | +0.6% |
ONTO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KLIC leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
AVX vs KLIC vs COHU vs ONTO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVX or KLIC or COHU or ONTO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Avax One Technology Ltd (AVX) is the stronger pick with 317.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) offers the better valuation at 98. 6x trailing P/E (38. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVX or KLIC or COHU or ONTO?
On trailing P/E, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the cheapest at 98. 6x versus Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 37. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVX or KLIC or COHU or ONTO?
Over the past 5 years, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) delivered a total return of +312. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Avax One Technology Ltd (AVX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ONTO returned +1432% versus AVX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVX or KLIC or COHU or ONTO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 87β versus Onto Innovation Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ONTO is approximately 42% more volatile than KLIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 46% for Cohu, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVX or KLIC or COHU or ONTO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Avax One Technology Ltd (AVX) is pulling ahead at 317.
0% versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. grew EPS 100. 3% year-over-year, compared to -31. 5% for Onto Innovation Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ONTO leads at 0. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVX or KLIC or COHU or ONTO?
Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus -239. 7% for Avax One Technology Ltd — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ONTO leads at 13. 2% versus -153. 2% for AVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONTO leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVX or KLIC or COHU or ONTO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) trades at 37. 4x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 51. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ONTO: 12. 5% to $308. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVX or KLIC or COHU or ONTO?
In this comparison, KLIC (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. AVX, COHU, ONTO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AVX or KLIC or COHU or ONTO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +814. 1% 10Y return). Avax One Technology Ltd (AVX) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KLIC: +814. 1%, AVX: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVX and KLIC and COHU and ONTO?
These companies operate in different sectors (AVX (Consumer Defensive) and KLIC (Technology) and COHU (Technology) and ONTO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AVX is a small-cap high-growth stock; KLIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. KLIC pays a dividend while AVX, COHU, ONTO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.