AZZ vs NN vs TRMB vs GRC

For growth investors, AZZ Inc.

(AZZ) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). AZZ Inc. (AZZ) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (22. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AZZ Inc. (AZZ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, AZZ Inc.

(AZZ) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus The Gorman-Rupp Company at 41. 9x. On forward P/E, Trimble Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AZZ Inc. wins at 0. 47x versus Trimble Inc. 's 6. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, AZZ Inc.

(AZZ) delivered a total return of +189. 4%, compared to -36. 0% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRC returned +237. 5% versus TRMB's +94. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AZZ Inc.

(AZZ) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus NextNav Inc. 's 1. 49β — meaning NN is approximately 27% more volatile than AZZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AZZ Inc. (AZZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 79% for The Gorman-Rupp Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AZZ Inc.

(AZZ) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AZZ Inc. grew EPS 486. 6% year-over-year, compared to -71. 3% for Trimble Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GRC leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

AZZ Inc.

(AZZ) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus -41. 4% for NextNav Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMB leads at 16. 9% versus -1535. 8% for NN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, AZZ Inc. (AZZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 47x versus Trimble Inc. 's 6. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) trades at 16. 3x forward P/E versus 32. 1x for The Gorman-Rupp Company — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMB: 85. 1% to $93. 33.

In this comparison, GRC (0.

9% yield), AZZ (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NN, TRMB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, AZZ Inc.

(AZZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), 0. 5% yield, +166. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AZZ: +166. 5%, NN: +120. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (AZZ (Industrials) and NN (Communication Services) and TRMB (Technology) and GRC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AZZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; NN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AZZ, GRC pay a dividend while NN, TRMB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.