Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BAER vs CODA vs RCAT vs JOBY vs ACHR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BAER
Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. Common Stock

Security & Protection Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$97M
5Y Perf.-82.1%
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$134M
5Y Perf.+34.0%
RCAT
Red Cat Holdings, Inc.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.02B
5Y Perf.+122.3%
JOBY
Joby Aviation, Inc.

Airlines, Airports & Air Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.83B
5Y Perf.-1.5%
ACHR
Archer Aviation Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.67B
5Y Perf.-37.5%

BAER vs CODA vs RCAT vs JOBY vs ACHR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BAER logoBAER
CODA logoCODA
RCAT logoRCAT
JOBY logoJOBY
ACHR logoACHR
IndustrySecurity & Protection ServicesAerospace & DefenseComputer HardwareAirlines, Airports & Air ServicesAerospace & Defense
Market Cap$97M$134M$1.02B$9.83B$4.67B
Revenue (TTM)$123M$28M$26M$78M$300K
Net Income (TTM)$4M$4M$-59M$-957M$-618M
Gross Margin42.1%66.3%7.9%11.2%
Operating Margin12.5%17.4%-234.6%-10.2%-2431.0%
Forward P/E22.5x
Total Debt$245M$395K$18M$61M$42M
Cash & Equiv.$31M$29M$168M$241M$1.02B

BAER vs CODA vs RCAT vs JOBY vs ACHRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BAER
CODA
RCAT
JOBY
ACHR
StockMar 21May 26Return
Bridger Aerospace G… (BAER)10017.9-82.1%
Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA)100134.0+34.0%
Red Cat Holdings, I… (RCAT)100222.3+122.3%
Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY)10098.5-1.5%
Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR)10062.5-37.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BAER vs CODA vs RCAT vs JOBY vs ACHR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Red Cat Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. JOBY also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BAER
Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. Common Stock
The Growth Angle

BAER lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.00
  • 8.4% 10Y total return vs JOBY's -4.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
  • 14.8% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
RCAT
Red Cat Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

RCAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 459.8%, EPS growth 29.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.6%
  • +92.6% vs ACHR's -26.6%
Best for: growth exposure
JOBY
Joby Aviation, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

JOBY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.

  • Beta 2.70, current ratio 24.09x
  • 391.8% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8%
Best for: defensive
ACHR
Archer Aviation Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, ACHR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJOBY logoJOBY391.8% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8%
Quality / MarginsCODA logoCODA14.8% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K%
Stability / SafetyCODA logoCODABeta 1.00 vs RCAT's 3.31, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RCAT logoRCAT+92.6% vs ACHR's -26.6%
Efficiency (ROA)CODA logoCODA6.6% ROA vs JOBY's -52.1%, ROIC 11.2% vs -54.7%

BAER vs CODA vs RCAT vs JOBY vs ACHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BAERBridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. Common Stock
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$123M
CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Equipment Sales
71.3%$14M
Service
17.3%$4M
Equipment Rentals
7.3%$1M
Software Sales
4.0%$811,912
RCATRed Cat Holdings, Inc.
FY 2023
Corporate and Other
50.0%$10M
Consumer
26.7%$5M
Other Segments
23.3%$5M
JOBYJoby Aviation, Inc.
FY 2025
Passenger
65.2%$35M
Product and Service, Other
34.8%$19M
ACHRArcher Aviation Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BAER vs CODA vs RCAT vs JOBY vs ACHR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCODALAGGINGACHR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

BAER is the larger business by revenue, generating $123M annually — 409.4x ACHR's $300,000. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBAER logoBAERBridger Aerospace…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…RCAT logoRCATRed Cat Holdings,…JOBY logoJOBYJoby Aviation, In…ACHR logoACHRArcher Aviation I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$123M$28M$26M$78M$300,000
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$31M$6M-$58M-$759M-$709M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M$4M-$59M-$957M-$618M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$64M$7M-$75M-$661M-$512M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+42.1%+66.3%+7.9%+11.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.5%+17.4%-2.3%-10.2%-2431.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.4%+14.8%-2.3%-12.3%-2060.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-52.3%+24.6%-2.9%-8.5%-1705.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-45.2%+28.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-11.1%+3.0%-9.1%+43.5%
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BAER leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, BAER's 10.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODA's 17.9x.

MetricBAER logoBAERBridger Aerospace…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…RCAT logoRCATRed Cat Holdings,…JOBY logoJOBYJoby Aviation, In…ACHR logoACHRArcher Aviation I…
Market CapShares × price$97M$134M$1.0B$9.8B$4.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$310M$106M$875M$9.6B$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.12x32.16x-17.27x-8.85x-6.34x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.05x17.85x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.79x5.05x25.15x183.94x9999.00x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.45x2.30x5.03x5.86x1.78x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.20x
BAER leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

BAER delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-74 for JOBY. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAER's 3.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs JOBY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBAER logoBAERBridger Aerospace…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…RCAT logoRCATRed Cat Holdings,…JOBY logoJOBYJoby Aviation, In…ACHR logoACHRArcher Aviation I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.4%+7.2%-33.6%-74.2%-37.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%+6.6%-28.8%-52.1%-32.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.6%+11.2%-71.0%-54.7%-89.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.3%+8.1%-42.9%-49.8%-44.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967435
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.79x0.01x0.07x0.04x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$213M-$28M-$149M-$180M-$979M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$31M$29M$168M$241M$1.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$245M$394,932$18M$61M$42M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.66x
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RCAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RCAT five years ago would be worth $26,979 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,769 for BAER. Over the past 12 months, RCAT leads with a +92.6% total return vs ACHR's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCAT at 125.5% vs BAER's -28.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBAER logoBAERBridger Aerospace…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…RCAT logoRCATRed Cat Holdings,…JOBY logoJOBYJoby Aviation, In…ACHR logoACHRArcher Aviation I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.9%+25.1%+13.1%-30.4%-22.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.2%+78.9%+92.6%+55.7%-26.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.7%+34.5%+1047.3%+128.7%+193.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-82.3%+49.7%+169.8%+1.0%-36.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-82.1%+844.4%-97.8%-4.8%-37.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-28.7%+10.4%+125.5%+31.8%+43.2%
RCAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CODA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CODA is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCAT's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs ACHR's 43.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBAER logoBAERBridger Aerospace…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…RCAT logoRCATRed Cat Holdings,…JOBY logoJOBYJoby Aviation, In…ACHR logoACHRArcher Aviation I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.98x1.00x3.31x2.70x2.96x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.44$17.28$18.78$20.95$14.62
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.22$5.98$5.23$6.32$4.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+50.3%+68.9%+55.2%+47.7%+43.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.648.639.465.561.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded574K256K15.8M24.7M27.6M
CODA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: BAER as "Buy", CODA as "Buy", RCAT as "Buy", JOBY as "Hold", ACHR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 189.0% upside for BAER (target: $5) vs 17.6% for CODA (target: $14).

MetricBAER logoBAERBridger Aerospace…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…RCAT logoRCATRed Cat Holdings,…JOBY logoJOBYJoby Aviation, In…ACHR logoACHRArcher Aviation I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00$14.00$17.00$15.90$12.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts11289
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BAER leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallCoda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BAER vs CODA vs RCAT vs JOBY vs ACHR: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BAER or CODA or RCAT or JOBY or ACHR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.

(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 6% for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (BAER). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (22. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (BAER) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — BAER or CODA or RCAT or JOBY or ACHR?

Over the past 5 years, Red Cat Holdings, Inc.

(RCAT) delivered a total return of +169. 8%, compared to -82. 3% for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (BAER). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus RCAT's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — BAER or CODA or RCAT or JOBY or ACHR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Red Cat Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning RCAT is approximately 230% more volatile than CODA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — BAER or CODA or RCAT or JOBY or ACHR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.

(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus 24. 6% for Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (BAER). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 48. 1% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCAT leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — BAER or CODA or RCAT or JOBY or ACHR?

Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is BAER or CODA or RCAT or JOBY or ACHR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BAER: 189.

0% to $5. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — BAER or CODA or RCAT or JOBY or ACHR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is BAER or CODA or RCAT or JOBY or ACHR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), +844. 4% 10Y return). Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CODA: +844. 4%, RCAT: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between BAER and CODA and RCAT and JOBY and ACHR?

These companies operate in different sectors (BAER (Industrials) and CODA (Industrials) and RCAT (Technology) and JOBY (Industrials) and ACHR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BAER is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; JOBY is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BAER

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CODA

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCAT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 229%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JOBY

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19591%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACHR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BAER and CODA and RCAT and JOBY and ACHR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BAER: -45.2% · CODA: 28.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(BAER: 3.4% · CODA: 14.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.