BAH vs LDOS

For growth investors, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the stronger pick with 12.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the cheapest at 10.

5x versus Leidos Holdings, Inc. at 12. 1x. On forward P/E, Leidos Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Leidos Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 55x versus Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's 0. 77x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Leidos Holdings, Inc.

(LDOS) delivered a total return of +37. 1%, compared to +2. 1% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LDOS returned +230. 5% versus BAH's +227. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

35β versus Leidos Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 42β — meaning LDOS is approximately 22% more volatile than BAH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 119% versus 4% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is pulling ahead at 12.

4% versus 3. 1% for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation grew EPS 58. 0% year-over-year, compared to 20. 7% for Leidos Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BAH leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Leidos Holdings, Inc.

(LDOS) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 5% net margin versus 7. 8% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LDOS leads at 12. 3% versus 11. 4% for BAH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BAH leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 55x versus Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's 0. 77x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LDOS: 51. 2% to $204. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 2% for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

35), 2. 7% yield, +227. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAH: +227. 5%, LDOS: +230. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (BAH (Industrials) and LDOS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.