BAK
Braskem S.A.
Chemicals
Market Cap$638M
5Y Perf.-64.1%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BAK vs LYB vs WLK vs OLN vs TROX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$23.04B
5Y Perf.+12.1%
WLK
Westlake Corporation
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$12.47B
5Y Perf.+104.2%
OLN
Olin Corporation
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.+122.4%
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc
Chemicals
Market Cap$1.34B
5Y Perf.+26.7%
BAK vs LYB vs WLK vs OLN vs TROX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BAK | LYB | WLK | OLN | TROX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals |
| Market Cap | $638M | $23.04B | $12.47B | $3.05B | $1.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $73.77B | $22.48B | $10.98B | $6.72B | $2.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5.24B | $-774M | $-1.64B | $-127M | $-359M |
| Gross Margin | 4.4% | -19.3% | 1.5% | 5.3% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | -2.8% | -0.9% | -15.5% | -1.6% | -4.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.9x | 26.1x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $73.72B | $15.96B | $6.44B | $3.39B | $3.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14.99B | $3.45B | $2.72B | $168M | $211M |
BAK vs LYB vs WLK vs OLN vs TROX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BAK
LYB
WLK
OLN
TROX
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Braskem S.A. (BAK) | 100 | 35.9 | -64.1% |
| LyondellBasell Indu… (LYB) | 100 | 112.1 | +12.1% |
| Westlake Corporation (WLK) | 100 | 204.2 | +104.2% |
| Olin Corporation (OLN) | 100 | 222.4 | +122.4% |
| Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAK vs LYB vs WLK vs OLN vs TROX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LYB leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Olin Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. BAK and TROX also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BAK
Braskem S.A.
The Growth Play
BAK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth -147.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.8%
- 9.7% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2%
Best for: growth exposure
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
The Income Pick
LYB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 7.7%
- Beta 0.38, yield 7.7%, current ratio 1.77x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.38 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and defensive
WLK
Westlake Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
WLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 142.4% 10Y total return vs TROX's 116.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 69.3%, current ratio 2.24x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
OLN
Olin Corporation
The Quality Compounder
OLN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- -1.9% margin vs WLK's -14.9%
- -1.7% ROA vs WLK's -8.2%, ROIC 1.7% vs -9.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc
The Momentum Pick
TROX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +76.9% vs BAK's +3.9%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BAK | 9.7% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2% |
| Value | LYB | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | OLN | -1.9% margin vs WLK's -14.9% |
| Stability / Safety | LYB | Beta 0.38 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage |
| Dividends | LYB | 7.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WLK's 2.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TROX | +76.9% vs BAK's +3.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OLN | -1.7% ROA vs WLK's -8.2%, ROIC 1.7% vs -9.0% |
BAK vs LYB vs WLK vs OLN vs TROX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
BAK vs LYB vs WLK vs OLN vs TROX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOLNLAGGINGTROX
Who Leads Where
OLN leads in 2 of 6 categories
BAK leads 0 • LYB leads 0 • WLK leads 0 • TROX leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓TROXTronox Holdings plc
0leads
WLKWestlake Corporation
0leads
LYBLyondellBasell Indust…
0leads
BAKBraskem S.A.
0leads
OLNOlin Corporation
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BAKvs LYBMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OLN3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
OLN8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LYB and TROX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAK is the larger business by revenue, generating $73.8B annually — 25.3x TROX's $2.9B. OLN is the more profitable business, keeping -1.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WLK's -14.9%. On growth, TROX holds the edge at +3.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BAKBraskem S.A. | LYBLyondellBasell In… | WLKWestlake Corporat… | OLNOlin Corporation | TROXTronox Holdings p… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $73.8B | $22.5B | $11.0B | $6.7B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.7B | $865M | -$462M | $284M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5.2B | -$774M | -$1.6B | -$127M | -$359M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6.1B | $3.1B | -$508M | $352M | -$139M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | -19.3% | +1.5% | +5.3% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | -0.9% | -15.5% | -1.6% | -4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | -3.4% | -14.9% | -1.9% | -12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | +13.6% | -4.6% | +5.2% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.7% | -100.0% | -6.8% | -3.7% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.6% | -100.0% | -3.2% | -61.8% | +7.1% |
Evenly matched — LYB and TROX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
OLN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, OLN's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LYB's 33.4x.
| Metric | BAKBraskem S.A. | LYBLyondellBasell In… | WLKWestlake Corporat… | OLNOlin Corporation | TROXTronox Holdings p… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $638M | $23.0B | $12.5B | $3.0B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.5B | $35.5B | $16.2B | $6.3B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.65x | -30.43x | -8.30x | -72.32x | -2.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.92x | 26.08x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.99x | 33.44x | — | 9.88x | 16.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 0.76x | 1.12x | 0.45x | 0.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.26x | 1.35x | 1.59x | 0.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 59.99x | — | 12.29x | — |
OLN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OLN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OLN delivers a -6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-30 for TROX. WLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TROX's 2.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OLN scores 5/9 vs TROX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BAKBraskem S.A. | LYBLyondellBasell In… | WLKWestlake Corporat… | OLNOlin Corporation | TROXTronox Holdings p… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -7.2% | -16.8% | -6.6% | -30.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.6% | -3.0% | -8.2% | -1.7% | -7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.5% | -1.1% | -9.0% | +1.7% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | -1.1% | -8.8% | +1.9% | -0.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.56x | 0.69x | 1.76x | 2.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $58.7B | $12.5B | $3.7B | $3.2B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15.0B | $3.4B | $2.7B | $168M | $211M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73.7B | $16.0B | $6.4B | $3.4B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.25x | -1.42x | -24.17x | 0.66x | -1.16x |
OLN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LYB and WLK and TROX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WLK five years ago would be worth $10,229 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,845 for BAK. Over the past 12 months, TROX leads with a +76.9% total return vs BAK's +3.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LYB at -1.9% vs BAK's -28.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BAKBraskem S.A. | LYBLyondellBasell In… | WLKWestlake Corporat… | OLNOlin Corporation | TROXTronox Holdings p… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.7% | +62.6% | +32.0% | +25.1% | +98.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.9% | +37.2% | +27.6% | +35.2% | +76.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.3% | -5.5% | -12.8% | -46.8% | -23.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.5% | -11.3% | +2.3% | -33.9% | -55.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.7% | +48.6% | +142.4% | +61.0% | +116.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.4% | -1.9% | -4.5% | -19.0% | -8.6% |
Evenly matched — LYB and WLK and TROX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYB and OLN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYB is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OLN currently trades 87.8% from its 52-week high vs BAK's 69.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BAKBraskem S.A. | LYBLyondellBasell In… | WLKWestlake Corporat… | OLNOlin Corporation | TROXTronox Holdings p… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 0.38x | 1.06x | 1.47x | 2.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.29 | $83.94 | $124.23 | $30.46 | $10.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.32 | $41.58 | $56.33 | $18.08 | $2.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +85.2% | +78.4% | +87.8% | +79.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 50.9 | 32.2 | 58.6 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 8.1M | 1.2M | 2.7M | 3.1M |
Evenly matched — LYB and OLN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LYB and WLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BAK as "Buy", LYB as "Hold", WLK as "Hold", OLN as "Hold", TROX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.6% upside for WLK (target: $102) vs -59.5% for BAK (target: $2). For income investors, LYB offers the higher dividend yield at 7.66% vs WLK's 2.17%.
| Metric | BAKBraskem S.A. | LYBLyondellBasell In… | WLKWestlake Corporat… | OLNOlin Corporation | TROXTronox Holdings p… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.50 | $73.60 | $101.88 | $24.33 | $7.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 39 | 32 | 35 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +7.7% | +2.2% | +3.0% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 12 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | $5.48 | $2.11 | $0.80 | $0.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.5% | +1.7% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — LYB and WLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
OLN leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
Best OverallOlin Corporation (OLN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BAK vs LYB vs WLK vs OLN vs TROX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAK or LYB or WLK or OLN or TROX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Braskem S.
A. (BAK) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). Analysts rate Braskem S. A. (BAK) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BAK or LYB or WLK or OLN or TROX?
Over the past 5 years, Westlake Corporation (WLK) delivered a total return of +2.
3%, compared to -61. 5% for Braskem S. A. (BAK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLK returned +142. 4% versus BAK's +1. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BAK or LYB or WLK or OLN or TROX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 521% more volatile than LYB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westlake Corporation (WLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BAK or LYB or WLK or OLN or TROX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Braskem S.
A. (BAK) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Olin Corporation grew EPS -140. 7% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, TROX leads at -5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BAK or LYB or WLK or OLN or TROX?
Olin Corporation (OLN) is the more profitable company, earning -0.
6% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps -0. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLN leads at 1. 7% versus -14. 1% for WLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TROX leads at 9. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BAK or LYB or WLK or OLN or TROX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Westlake Corporation — 16. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WLK: 4. 6% to $101. 88.
07Which pays a better dividend — BAK or LYB or WLK or OLN or TROX?
In this comparison, LYB (7.
7% yield), TROX (3. 6% yield), OLN (3. 0% yield), WLK (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BAK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BAK or LYB or WLK or OLN or TROX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 7. 7% yield). Braskem S. A. (BAK) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYB: +48. 6%, BAK: +1. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BAK and LYB and WLK and OLN and TROX?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; OLN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock. LYB, WLK, OLN, TROX pay a dividend while BAK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BAK: -18.7% · LYB: -100.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.