BATL vs MGY

For growth investors, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) is the stronger pick with -0.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) offers the better valuation at 16. 1x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation is actually cheaper at 10.

3x.

Over the past 5 years, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) delivered a total return of +146.

6%, compared to -77. 5% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGY returned +203. 8% versus BATL's -72. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -1.

71β versus Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation's 0. 24β — meaning MGY is approximately -114% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) is pulling ahead at -0.

3% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Battalion Oil Corporation grew EPS 42. 6% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGY leads at -8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) is the more profitable company, earning 24.

8% net margin versus 7. 2% for Battalion Oil Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGY leads at 33. 5% versus -4. 0% for BATL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATL leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) trades at 10.

3x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Battalion Oil Corporation — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 2% for Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.

71), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -72. 1%, MGY: +203. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MGY is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.