BBD vs ITUB

For growth investors, Banco Bradesco S.

A. (BBD) is the stronger pick with 37. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 0% for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. (ITUB). Banco Bradesco S. A. (BBD) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (1. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. (ITUB) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Banco Bradesco S.

A. (BBD) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. at 10. 6x. On forward P/E, Banco Bradesco S. A. is actually cheaper at 1. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. wins at 0. 09x versus Banco Bradesco S. A. 's 0. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Itaú Unibanco Holding S.

A. (ITUB) delivered a total return of +162. 5%, compared to +20. 4% for Banco Bradesco S. A. (BBD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITUB returned +196. 3% versus BBD's +62. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Itaú Unibanco Holding S.

A. (ITUB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Banco Bradesco S. A. 's 1. 15β — meaning BBD is approximately 4% more volatile than ITUB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banco Bradesco S. A. (BBD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 5% for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Banco Bradesco S.

A. (BBD) is pulling ahead at 37. 1% versus 18. 0% for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. (ITUB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banco Bradesco S. A. grew EPS 34. 4% year-over-year, compared to 4. 0% for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Itaú Unibanco Holding S.

A. (ITUB) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus 6. 8% for Banco Bradesco S. A. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITUB leads at 13. 1% versus -1. 1% for BBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BBD leads at 34. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. (ITUB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 09x versus Banco Bradesco S. A. 's 0. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Banco Bradesco S. A. (BBD) trades at 1. 4x forward P/E versus 1. 8x for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBD: -17. 1% to $3. 20.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. (ITUB) offers the highest yield at 10. 1%, versus 5. 9% for Banco Bradesco S. A. (BBD).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Itaú Unibanco Holding S.

A. (ITUB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 10. 1% yield, +196. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITUB: +196. 3%, BBD: +62. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.