Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BCLI vs AGEN vs KO vs JPM vs NKTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
Biotechnology
BCLI vs AGEN vs KO vs JPM vs NKTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $10M | $125M | $341.71B | $908.57B | $1.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $124M | $49.28B | $280.33B | $56M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $65M | $13.70B | $57.05B | $-158M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.1% | 61.7% | 60.0% | 99.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.6% | 29.3% | 25.9% | -224.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 3.8x | 24.3x | 14.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $208K | $335M | $45.49B | $942.38B | $149M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29K | $3M | $10.27B | $343.34B | $15M |
BCLI vs AGEN vs KO vs JPM vs NKTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brainstorm Cell The… (BCLI) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 3.8 | -96.2% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 17.6 | -82.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCLI vs AGEN vs KO vs JPM vs NKTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCLI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and stability.
- 13.6% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
- Beta 0.86 vs AGEN's 2.13
AGEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- 52.2% margin vs NKTR's -284.2%
- 31.0% ROA vs BCLI's -7.3%
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.23, yield 2.6%
- 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs KO's 115.0%
- PEG 0.83 vs KO's 2.17
- Beta 0.87, yield 1.8%, current ratio 0.52x
- Better valuation composite
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, current ratio 4.97x
- +6.1% vs AGEN's -32.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.2% margin vs NKTR's -284.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs AGEN's 2.13 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.1% vs AGEN's -32.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 31.0% ROA vs BCLI's -7.3% |
BCLI vs AGEN vs KO vs JPM vs NKTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BCLI vs AGEN vs KO vs JPM vs NKTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
AGEN leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • BCLI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and BCLI operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 52.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -2.8%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +40.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $124M | $49.3B | $280.3B | $56M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $16M | $15.5B | $81.4B | -$124M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $65M | $13.7B | $57.0B | -$158M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$88M | $12.6B | $100.9B | -$204M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.1% | +61.7% | +60.0% | +99.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +6.6% | +29.3% | +25.9% | -2.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +52.2% | +27.8% | +20.4% | -2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -70.7% | +25.5% | +36.0% | -3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +40.2% | +12.1% | — | +3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.8% | +199.0% | +18.2% | +16.0% | +49.7% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 38% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $125M | $341.7B | $908.6B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $457M | $376.9B | $1.51T | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.78x | -882.35x | 26.12x | 16.22x | -6.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.82x | 24.27x | 14.60x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.34x | 0.92x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 25.45x | 18.52x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.09x | 7.13x | 3.25x | 21.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 9.99x | 2.51x | 11.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 64.52x | 9.01x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-87 for NKTR. KO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | +41.1% | +15.9% | -87.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.3% | +31.0% | +13.1% | +1.3% | -40.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | +15.8% | +4.5% | -57.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | — | +17.3% | +8.9% | -55.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.33x | 2.60x | 1.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $179,000 | $332M | $35.2B | $599.0B | $134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29,000 | $3M | $10.3B | $343.3B | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $208,000 | $335M | $45.5B | $942.4B | $149M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -110.00x | 1.41x | 10.70x | 0.74x | -4.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $148 for BCLI. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +608.2% total return vs AGEN's -32.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 94.8% vs BCLI's -70.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.7% | -7.1% | +16.4% | +0.8% | +40.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.6% | -32.9% | +17.7% | +20.9% | +608.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | -92.0% | +39.3% | +138.8% | +639.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -97.1% | +65.3% | +135.5% | -76.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -96.4% | +115.0% | +481.2% | -73.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.5% | -56.9% | +11.7% | +33.7% | +94.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KO and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs AGEN's 40.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 2.13x | -0.23x | 0.87x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.32 | $7.34 | $84.04 | $338.09 | $109.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.46 | $2.71 | $65.35 | $269.72 | $8.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.5% | +40.9% | +94.5% | +96.2% | +55.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 38.8 | 49.2 | 72.1 | 39.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 852K | 13.6M | 7.4M | 998K |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGEN as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 145.3% upside for NKTR (target: $150) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs JPM's 1.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.33 | $86.13 | $339.75 | $149.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 48 | 61 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.6% | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 56 | 15 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | $5.95 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.2% | +3.8% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). AGEN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
BCLI vs AGEN vs KO vs JPM vs NKTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCLI or AGEN or KO or JPM or NKTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Agenus Inc. (AGEN) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCLI or AGEN or KO or JPM or NKTR?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Agenus Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCLI or AGEN or KO or JPM or NKTR?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -98. 5% for Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (BCLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus BCLI's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCLI or AGEN or KO or JPM or NKTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning AGEN is approximately -1014% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 133% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCLI or AGEN or KO or JPM or NKTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -150. 7% for Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGEN leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCLI or AGEN or KO or JPM or NKTR?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCLI or AGEN or KO or JPM or NKTR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc. (AGEN) trades at 3. 8x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 20. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NKTR: 145. 3% to $149. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCLI or AGEN or KO or JPM or NKTR?
In this comparison, KO (2.
6% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. BCLI, AGEN, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BCLI or AGEN or KO or JPM or NKTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, AGEN: -96. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCLI and AGEN and KO and JPM and NKTR?
These companies operate in different sectors (BCLI (Healthcare) and AGEN (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and NKTR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BCLI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KO, JPM pay a dividend while BCLI, AGEN, NKTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.