Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BDSX vs ONCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
BDSX vs ONCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $116M | $1M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $96M | $815K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $-14M |
| Gross Margin | 59.9% | 77.6% |
| Operating Margin | -26.0% | -21.9% |
| Total Debt | $73M | $49K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $5M |
BDSX vs ONCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biodesix, Inc. (BDSX) | 100 | 32.2 | -67.8% |
| Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BDSX vs ONCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BDSX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.40
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 29.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
- -94.0% 10Y total return vs ONCO's -100.0%
ONCO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 34.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.1% revenue growth vs ONCO's -67.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | -33.3% margin vs ONCO's -17.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs ONCO's 1.28 | |
| Dividends | 34.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +120.1% vs ONCO's -98.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -35.6% ROA vs ONCO's -68.0%, ROIC -38.7% vs -32.8% |
BDSX vs ONCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BDSX vs ONCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BDSX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BDSX is the larger business by revenue, generating $96M annually — 117.9x ONCO's $815,371. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -33.3% (BDSX) to -17.2% (ONCO). On growth, BDSX holds the edge at +42.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $96M | $815,371 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | -$18M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$25M | -$10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.9% | +77.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.0% | -21.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.3% | -17.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.3% | -11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.3% | -57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.4% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
BDSX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $116M | $1M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $170M | -$4M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.28x | -0.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.31x | 1.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ONCO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ONCO delivers a -189.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-190 in annual profit, vs $-21 for BDSX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ONCO scores 5/9 vs BDSX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.0% | -189.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.6% | -68.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.7% | -32.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -36.4% | -49.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $54M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $48,774 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.47x | -26.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BDSX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BDSX five years ago would be worth $510 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ONCO. Over the past 12 months, BDSX leads with a +120.1% total return vs ONCO's -98.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BDSX at -22.1% vs ONCO's -97.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +137.2% | -95.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +120.1% | -98.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.7% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.0% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.1% | -97.2% |
Risk & Volatility
BDSX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BDSX is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ONCO's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BDSX currently trades 76.2% from its 52-week high vs ONCO's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.40x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.11 | $74.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.44 | $0.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.2% | +0.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 28.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 9.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
ONCO is the only dividend payer here at 34.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +34.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BDSX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ONCO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
BDSX vs ONCO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BDSX or ONCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Biodesix, Inc.
(BDSX) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -67. 7% for Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO). Analysts rate Biodesix, Inc. (BDSX) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BDSX or ONCO?
Over the past 5 years, Biodesix, Inc.
(BDSX) delivered a total return of -94. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BDSX returned -94. 0% versus ONCO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BDSX or ONCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Biodesix, Inc.
(BDSX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Onconetix, Inc. 's 1. 28β — meaning ONCO is approximately 216% more volatile than BDSX relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — BDSX or ONCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Biodesix, Inc.
(BDSX) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus -67. 7% for Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Onconetix, Inc. grew EPS 99. 1% year-over-year, compared to 29. 2% for Biodesix, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BDSX or ONCO?
Biodesix, Inc.
(BDSX) is the more profitable company, earning -39. 8% net margin versus -1721. 0% for Onconetix, Inc. — meaning it keeps -39. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BDSX leads at -31. 5% versus -778. 2% for ONCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONCO leads at 77. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BDSX or ONCO?
In this comparison, ONCO (34.
1% yield) pays a dividend. BDSX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BDSX or ONCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Biodesix, Inc.
(BDSX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BDSX: -94. 0%, ONCO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BDSX and ONCO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BDSX is a small-cap high-growth stock; ONCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. ONCO pays a dividend while BDSX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.