Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP vs TXN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP vs TXN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $3.77B | $11.57B | $4.08B | $53.62B | $262.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $702M | $453M | $446M | $4.37B | $18.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $55M | $119M | $17M | $-97M | $5.37B |
| Gross Margin | 39.2% | 57.3% | 53.9% | 55.4% | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | 18.1% | 4.6% | 4.1% | 35.3% |
| Forward P/E | 34.8x | 92.5x | 58.7x | 63.2x | 38.1x |
| Total Debt | $237M | $13M | $0.00 | $5.67B | $15.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $403M | $59M | $772M | $3.23B |
BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP vs TXN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) | 100 | 3180.1 | +3080.1% |
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 420.6 | +320.6% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 206.4 | +106.4% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP vs TXN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BELFB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.3%, EPS growth 42.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.1%
- PEG 0.90 vs VICR's 2.07
- 26.3% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
- Lower P/E (34.8x vs 38.1x)
VICR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 26.5% 10Y total return vs BELFB's 16.8%
- +5.2% vs POWI's +43.3%
- 16.6% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs 1.8%
POWI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, MCHP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 94.6%, current ratio 4.35x
- Beta 1.09, yield 1.9%, current ratio 4.35x
- 29.1% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.3% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (34.8x vs 38.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.1% margin vs MCHP's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs VICR's 2.87 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs MCHP's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.2% vs POWI's +43.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs 1.8% |
BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP vs TXN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP vs TXN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TXN leads in 4 of 6 categories
BELFB leads 1 • VICR leads 0 • POWI leads 0 • MCHP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 41.3x POWI's $446M. TXN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, TXN holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $702M | $453M | $446M | $4.4B | $18.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $137M | $103M | $41M | $881M | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55M | $119M | $17M | -$97M | $5.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $74M | $119M | $85M | $820M | $3.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | +57.3% | +53.9% | +55.4% | +57.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +18.1% | +4.6% | +4.1% | +35.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +26.2% | +3.7% | -2.2% | +29.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +26.3% | +18.9% | +18.8% | +20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.2% | +11.5% | +2.6% | +15.6% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.0% | +3.4% | -60.0% | +164.2% | +32.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BELFB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 52.8x trailing earnings, TXN trades at a 72% valuation discount to POWI's 187.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BELFB offers better value at 1.67x vs VICR's 2.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $11.6B | $4.1B | $53.6B | $262.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $11.2B | $4.0B | $58.5B | $274.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 64.22x | 98.26x | 187.90x | -9999.00x | 52.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.83x | 92.55x | 58.74x | 63.20x | 38.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.67x | 2.19x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.38x | 194.00x | 81.32x | 55.92x | 34.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.58x | 28.37x | 9.20x | 12.18x | 14.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.20x | 16.19x | 6.13x | 7.52x | 16.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.45x | 97.02x | 46.85x | 69.45x | 100.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. VICR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BELFB scores 9/9 vs MCHP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.6% | +18.7% | +2.4% | -1.4% | +32.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.8% | +16.6% | +2.1% | -0.7% | +15.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | +8.9% | +2.4% | +1.8% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.2% | +5.7% | +2.9% | +2.1% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.02x | — | 0.80x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $179M | -$390M | -$59M | $4.9B | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $403M | $59M | $772M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $237M | $13M | $0 | $5.7B | $15.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.38x | — | — | 0.78x | 12.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BELFB and VICR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BELFB five years ago would be worth $187,817 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,871 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +524.2% total return vs POWI's +43.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BELFB at 90.8% vs POWI's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +72.5% | +119.5% | +97.0% | +53.1% | +63.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +304.1% | +524.2% | +43.3% | +105.4% | +77.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +594.9% | +496.6% | -4.5% | +40.6% | +85.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1778.2% | +218.0% | -1.3% | +48.7% | +72.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1677.7% | +2651.8% | +239.0% | +363.4% | +476.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +90.8% | +81.4% | -1.5% | +12.0% | +22.8% |
Risk & Volatility
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXN is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXN currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs VICR's 87.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 2.87x | 2.11x | 1.69x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $307.00 | $293.95 | $81.59 | $105.91 | $292.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.00 | $40.54 | $30.86 | $48.52 | $152.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.1% | +87.2% | +89.8% | +93.6% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.4 | 59.9 | 61.3 | 78.9 | 75.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 179K | 860K | 982K | 9.1M | 6.7M |
Analyst Outlook
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BELFB as "Buy", VICR as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy", TXN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -11.9% for TXN (target: $254). For income investors, TXN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.90% vs POWI's 1.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $294.75 | $245.00 | $79.00 | $106.35 | $253.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 7 | 16 | 46 | 65 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — | +1.1% | +1.8% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | — | $0.84 | $1.82 | $5.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +2.4% | +0.2% | +0.6% |
TXN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BELFB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP vs TXN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP or TXN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bel Fuse Inc.
(BELFB) is the stronger pick with 26. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) offers the better valuation at 52. 8x trailing P/E (38. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP or TXN?
On trailing P/E, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the cheapest at 52.
8x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 187. 9x. On forward P/E, Bel Fuse Inc. is actually cheaper at 34. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bel Fuse Inc. wins at 0. 90x versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP or TXN?
Over the past 5 years, Bel Fuse Inc.
(BELFB) delivered a total return of +1778%, compared to -1. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +26. 5% versus POWI's +239. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP or TXN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
09β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 87β — meaning VICR is approximately 163% more volatile than TXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP or TXN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bel Fuse Inc.
(BELFB) is pulling ahead at 26. 3% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, BELFB leads at 1. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP or TXN?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXN leads at 34. 1% versus 4. 8% for POWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXN leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP or TXN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) trades at 34. 8x forward P/E versus 92. 5x for Vicor Corporation — 57. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 7. 8% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP or TXN?
In this comparison, TXN (1.
9% yield), MCHP (1. 8% yield), POWI (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BELFB, VICR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP or TXN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
09), 1. 9% yield, +476. 4% 10Y return). Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a higher beta of 2. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +476. 4%, VICR: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BELFB and VICR and POWI and MCHP and TXN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BELFB is a small-cap high-growth stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TXN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. POWI, MCHP, TXN pay a dividend while BELFB, VICR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.