Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BEPH vs CWEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
BEPH vs CWEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $4.26B | $7.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.30B | $1.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-213M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 50.3% |
| Operating Margin | 16.0% | 12.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.9x |
| Total Debt | $35.90B | $10.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.13B | $818M |
BEPH vs CWEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield BRP Hold… (BEPH) | 100 | 60.8 | -39.2% |
| Clearway Energy, In… (CWEN) | 100 | 132.9 | +32.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BEPH vs CWEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BEPH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth -178.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.8%
- 16.6% FFO/revenue growth vs CWEN's 4.2%
- 23.7% yield, vs CWEN's 7.9%
CWEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 7.9%
- 237.4% 10Y total return vs BEPH's -16.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 1.13x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% FFO/revenue growth vs CWEN's 4.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs BEPH's -3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs BEPH's 1.00 | |
| Dividends | 23.7% yield, vs CWEN's 7.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.6% vs BEPH's +9.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs BEPH's -0.2%, ROIC 0.9% vs 1.3% |
BEPH vs CWEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BEPH vs CWEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BEPH and CWEN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEPH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.3B annually — 4.4x CWEN's $1.4B. CWEN is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEPH's -3.4%. On growth, CWEN holds the edge at +21.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.3B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.3B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$213M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4.5B | $268M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +50.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +12.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -71.9% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | +21.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.1% | -35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BEPH leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BEPH's 12.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWEN's 16.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $37.0B | $17.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.79x | 26.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.97x | 16.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 5.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.12x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CWEN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CWEN delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-1 for BEPH. BEPH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.98x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWEN's 1.72x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +1.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.98x | 1.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32.8B | $9.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.1B | $818M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35.9B | $10.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.54x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWEN five years ago would be worth $17,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,404 for BEPH. Over the past 12 months, CWEN leads with a +39.6% total return vs BEPH's +9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWEN at 12.8% vs BEPH's 7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.5% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.3% | +39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.9% | +43.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.0% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.8% | +237.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.1% | +12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CWEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEPH's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWEN currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs BEPH's 88.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.89 | $41.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.51 | $27.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.5% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 828K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BEPH and CWEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, BEPH offers the higher dividend yield at 23.70% vs CWEN's 7.89%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +23.7% | +7.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.54 | $3.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | 0.0% |
CWEN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BEPH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BEPH vs CWEN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BEPH or CWEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4.
625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes (BEPH) is the stronger pick with 16. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN). Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BEPH or CWEN?
Over the past 5 years, Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) delivered a total return of +72. 5%, compared to -16. 0% for Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4. 625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes (BEPH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWEN returned +237. 4% versus BEPH's -16. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BEPH or CWEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4. 625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes's 1. 00β — meaning BEPH is approximately 85% more volatile than CWEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4. 625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes (BEPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 98% versus 172% for Clearway Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BEPH or CWEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4.
625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes (BEPH) is pulling ahead at 16. 6% versus 4. 2% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearway Energy, Inc. grew EPS 89. 3% year-over-year, compared to -178. 1% for Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4. 625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEPH leads at 12. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BEPH or CWEN?
Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -3. 7% for Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4. 625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BEPH leads at 18. 4% versus 12. 3% for CWEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEPH leads at 56. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BEPH or CWEN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4. 625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes (BEPH) offers the highest yield at 23. 7%, versus 7. 9% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN).
07Is BEPH or CWEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 7. 9% yield, +237. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWEN: +237. 4%, BEPH: -16. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BEPH and CWEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (BEPH (Real Estate) and CWEN (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BEPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWEN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.