Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BFC vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
BFC vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.43B | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $223M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $71M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 69.6% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 35.6% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.2x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $147M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $261M | $119M |
BFC vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank First Corporat… (BFC) | 100 | 235.2 | +135.2% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 291.2 | +191.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BFC vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BFC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -10.5%
- 447.2% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- PEG 1.39 vs CZWI's 2.32
CZWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 15.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs BFC's 0.78 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs BFC's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs BFC's +29.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
BFC vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BFC vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BFC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $223M annually — 2.5x CZWI's $90M. BFC is the more profitable business, keeping 29.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $223M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $95M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $71M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $52M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.6% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, CZWI trades at a 35% valuation discount to BFC's 22.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BFC offers better value at 2.04x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.31x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.19x | 11.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.04x | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.98x | 15.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.39x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.28x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.32x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BFC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BFC delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. BFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZWI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs BFC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.2% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.3% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$114M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $261M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $147M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.21x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BFC five years ago would be worth $21,510 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,124 for CZWI. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs BFC's +29.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs BFC's 31.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.6% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.6% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.0% | +160.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.1% | +71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +447.2% | +157.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.0% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BFC and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFC's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $153.00 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $109.11 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.0 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 92K | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
CZWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BFC as "Hold" and CZWI as "Buy". For income investors, CZWI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.76% vs BFC's 1.07%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $157.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.55 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +3.1% |
CZWI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). BFC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
BFC vs CZWI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BFC or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bank First Corporation (BFC) is the stronger pick with 19.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BFC or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Bank First Corporation at 22. 3x. On forward P/E, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank First Corporation wins at 1. 39x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BFC or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Bank First Corporation (BFC) delivered a total return of +115.
1%, compared to +71. 2% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BFC returned +452. 8% versus CZWI's +161. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BFC or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Bank First Corporation's 0. 78β — meaning BFC is approximately 72% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank First Corporation (BFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 28% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BFC or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bank First Corporation (BFC) is pulling ahead at 19.
7% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 9. 0% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Bank First Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BFC or CZWI?
Bank First Corporation (BFC) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
4% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BFC leads at 35. 6% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BFC leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BFC or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank First Corporation (BFC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 39x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for Bank First Corporation — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — BFC or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 1. 1% for Bank First Corporation (BFC).
09Is BFC or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 1. 8% yield, +161. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +161. 7%, BFC: +452. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BFC and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BFC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.