Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BFRI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
BFRI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $13M | $1712.35T | $1.61B | $5.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $0.00 | $4.18B | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-168M | $-1.82B | $153M |
| Gross Margin | 75.8% | — | 34.2% | 65.4% |
| Operating Margin | -27.2% | — | -4.1% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 5.6x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $22M | $3.97B | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $194M | $532M | $1.12B |
BFRI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biofrontera Inc. (BFRI) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 66.0 | -34.0% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 26.0 | -74.0% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 116.9 | +16.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BFRI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BFRI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- 11.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +110.4% vs PRGO's -51.2%
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 9.8%
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 24.8x)
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
ALKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -11.0% 10Y total return vs PRGO's -77.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- Beta 1.06, current ratio 3.55x
- 9.8% margin vs PRGO's -43.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs PRGO's -43.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs BFRI's 1.67, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
BFRI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BFRI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRGO leads in 2 of 6 categories
ALKS leads 2 • DBVT leads 1 • BFRI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BFRI and ALKS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, BFRI holds the edge at +36.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $0 | $4.2B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$112M | $58M | $212M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$168M | -$1.8B | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | -$151M | $108M | $392M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.8% | — | +34.2% | +65.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.2% | — | -4.1% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.3% | — | -43.5% | +9.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.0% | — | +2.6% | +25.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.2% | — | -7.2% | +28.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +91.5% | -56.4% | -4.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALKS's 17.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $1712.35T | $1.6B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $1712.35T | $5.1B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -0.76x | -1.14x | 24.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 5.56x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 7.42x | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | — | 0.38x | 4.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.66x | 0.55x | 3.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 11.12x | 12.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-11 for BFRI. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs PRGO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.4% | -130.2% | -50.7% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -52.2% | -89.0% | -19.8% | +5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -124.3% | — | +3.7% | +18.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -84.8% | -145.7% | +4.3% | +14.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.13x | 1.35x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$231,000 | -$172M | $3.4B | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $194M | $532M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $22M | $4.0B | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -69.93x | -189.82x | -7.20x | 32.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $129 for BFRI. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs BFRI's -54.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +57.2% | +4.9% | -13.5% | +25.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.5% | +110.4% | -51.2% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.5% | +19.7% | -58.1% | +14.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -69.1% | -60.1% | +60.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -87.0% | -77.7% | -11.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -54.4% | +6.2% | -25.2% | +4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
ALKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFRI's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 1.26x | 1.18x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.19 | $26.18 | $28.44 | $36.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.54 | $7.53 | $9.23 | $25.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +76.3% | +41.2% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.6 | 48.1 | 60.9 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 122K | 252K | 3.4M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", ALKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 24.3% for ALKS (target: $44). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $20.00 | $44.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 36 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +9.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
PRGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). ALKS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
BFRI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BFRI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Biofrontera Inc.
(BFRI) is the stronger pick with 11. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BFRI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -98. 7% for Biofrontera Inc. (BFRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALKS returned -11. 0% versus BFRI's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BFRI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
06β versus Biofrontera Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning BFRI is approximately 58% more volatile than ALKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BFRI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Biofrontera Inc.
(BFRI) is pulling ahead at 11. 8% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Biofrontera Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, BFRI leads at 13. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BFRI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -27. 2% for BFRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BFRI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.
8% to $46. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — BFRI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. BFRI, DBVT, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BFRI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
18), 9. 8% yield). Biofrontera Inc. (BFRI) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRGO: -77. 7%, BFRI: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BFRI and DBVT and PRGO and ALKS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BFRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PRGO pays a dividend while BFRI, DBVT, ALKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.