Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BFRI vs DERM vs PRGO vs NVCR vs GDRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
BFRI vs DERM vs PRGO vs NVCR vs GDRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $13M | $102M | $1.61B | $1.92B | $973M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $56M | $4.18B | $674M | $788M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-9M | $-1.82B | $-173M | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 75.8% | 67.5% | 34.2% | 75.2% | 81.0% |
| Operating Margin | -27.2% | -12.2% | -4.1% | -27.2% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 69.0x | 5.6x | — | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $26M | $3.97B | $290M | $60M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $20M | $532M | $103M | $262M |
BFRI vs DERM vs PRGO vs NVCR vs GDRX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biofrontera Inc. (BFRI) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| Journey Medical Cor… (DERM) | 100 | 63.2 | -36.8% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 31.9 | -68.1% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 18.0 | -82.0% |
| GoodRx Holdings, In… (GDRX) | 100 | 7.1 | -92.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BFRI vs DERM vs PRGO vs NVCR vs GDRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BFRI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- 11.8% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1%
- +62.5% vs PRGO's -51.2%
DERM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -47.4% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 30.3%
PRGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 9.8%
- Beta 1.18, yield 9.8%, current ratio 2.76x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.18 vs NVCR's 2.20
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GDRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.58, Low D/E 9.7%, current ratio 2.61x
- 3.7% margin vs PRGO's -43.5%
- 1.9% ROA vs BFRI's -52.2%, ROIC 13.0% vs -124.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.8% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs PRGO's -43.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs NVCR's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.5% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.9% ROA vs BFRI's -52.2%, ROIC 13.0% vs -124.3% |
BFRI vs DERM vs PRGO vs NVCR vs GDRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BFRI vs DERM vs PRGO vs NVCR vs GDRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GDRX leads in 2 of 6 categories
DERM leads 1 • PRGO leads 1 • BFRI leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GDRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 100.2x BFRI's $42M. GDRX is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, BFRI holds the edge at +36.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $56M | $4.2B | $674M | $788M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$3M | $58M | -$165M | $184M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$9M | -$1.8B | -$173M | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | -$3M | $108M | -$48M | $132M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.8% | +67.5% | +34.2% | +75.2% | +81.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.2% | -12.2% | -4.1% | -27.2% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.3% | -15.5% | -43.5% | -25.7% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.0% | -4.8% | +2.6% | -7.1% | +16.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.2% | +1.0% | -7.2% | +12.3% | -4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +5.9% | -56.4% | -100.0% | -1.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PRGO and GDRX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GDRX's 4.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRGO's 7.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $102M | $1.6B | $1.9B | $973M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $108M | $5.1B | $2.1B | $771M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -6.94x | -1.14x | -13.80x | 33.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 68.97x | 5.56x | — | 8.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 7.42x | — | 4.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 1.82x | 0.38x | 2.92x | 1.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.09x | 0.55x | 5.51x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 11.12x | — | 5.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GDRX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GDRX delivers a 4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-11 for BFRI. GDRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GDRX scores 6/9 vs DERM's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.4% | -45.4% | -50.7% | -50.8% | +4.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -52.2% | -10.8% | -19.8% | -16.5% | +1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -124.3% | -56.8% | +3.7% | -16.4% | +13.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -84.8% | -34.2% | +4.3% | -28.9% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 1.28x | 1.35x | 0.85x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$231,000 | $5M | $3.4B | $187M | -$202M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $20M | $532M | $103M | $262M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $26M | $4.0B | $290M | $60M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -69.93x | -1.52x | -7.20x | -96.80x | 3.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DERM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DERM five years ago would be worth $5,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $129 for BFRI. Over the past 12 months, BFRI leads with a +62.5% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DERM at 44.7% vs BFRI's -54.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +57.2% | -32.9% | -13.5% | +28.3% | +3.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.5% | -28.1% | -51.2% | +1.1% | -25.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.5% | +203.0% | -58.1% | -75.7% | -38.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -47.4% | -60.1% | -91.3% | -91.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -47.4% | -77.7% | +30.3% | -94.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -54.4% | +44.7% | -25.2% | -37.6% | -14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BFRI and PRGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRGO is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BFRI currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 1.82x | 1.18x | 2.20x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.19 | $9.55 | $28.44 | $20.06 | $5.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.54 | $4.31 | $9.23 | $9.82 | $1.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +52.3% | +41.2% | +83.9% | +48.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.6 | 44.3 | 60.9 | 69.8 | 66.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 122K | 230K | 3.4M | 1.5M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DERM as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy", GDRX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 135.0% upside for DERM (target: $12) vs 12.3% for GDRX (target: $3). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.75 | $20.00 | $33.50 | $3.19 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 36 | 15 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +9.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 10 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.15 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +21.3% |
GDRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DERM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BFRI vs DERM vs PRGO vs NVCR vs GDRX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BFRI or DERM or PRGO or NVCR or GDRX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Biofrontera Inc.
(BFRI) is the stronger pick with 11. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). GoodRx Holdings, Inc. (GDRX) offers the better valuation at 33. 3x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BFRI or DERM or PRGO or NVCR or GDRX?
On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5.
6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BFRI or DERM or PRGO or NVCR or GDRX?
Over the past 5 years, Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) delivered a total return of -47.
4%, compared to -98. 7% for Biofrontera Inc. (BFRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVCR returned +30. 3% versus BFRI's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BFRI or DERM or PRGO or NVCR or GDRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
18β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 87% more volatile than PRGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GoodRx Holdings, Inc. (GDRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BFRI or DERM or PRGO or NVCR or GDRX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Biofrontera Inc.
(BFRI) is pulling ahead at 11. 8% versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GoodRx Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 104. 1% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, BFRI leads at 13. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BFRI or DERM or PRGO or NVCR or GDRX?
GoodRx Holdings, Inc.
(GDRX) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 8% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GDRX leads at 13. 4% versus -27. 2% for BFRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GDRX leads at 82. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BFRI or DERM or PRGO or NVCR or GDRX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
6x forward P/E versus 69. 0x for Journey Medical Corporation — 63. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DERM: 135. 0% to $11. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — BFRI or DERM or PRGO or NVCR or GDRX?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. BFRI, DERM, NVCR, GDRX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BFRI or DERM or PRGO or NVCR or GDRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
18), 9. 8% yield). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRGO: -77. 7%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BFRI and DERM and PRGO and NVCR and GDRX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BFRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DERM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GDRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PRGO pays a dividend while BFRI, DERM, NVCR, GDRX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.