Luxury Goods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BGI vs SIG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Luxury Goods
BGI vs SIG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Luxury Goods |
| Market Cap | $13M | $3.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $348M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $0.00 |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $145M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | — |
BGI vs SIG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birks Group Inc. (BGI) | 100 | 112.8 | +12.8% |
| Signet Jewelers Lim… (SIG) | 100 | 829.7 | +729.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BGI vs SIG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BGI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.83
- Rev growth -4.0%, EPS growth -179.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- 38.2% 10Y total return vs SIG's -9.7%
SIG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +46.2% vs BGI's -24.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.0% revenue growth vs SIG's -100.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs SIG's 1.74 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.2% vs BGI's -24.2% |
BGI vs SIG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BGI vs SIG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BGI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BGI and SIG operate at a comparable scale, with $348M and $0 in trailing revenue. On growth, BGI holds the edge at -8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $348M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $0 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $0 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.8% | -2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -104.6% | -146.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $119M | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.37x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 73.68x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SIG leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BGI scores 2/9 vs SIG's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.8% | — |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.0% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $144M | $0 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | — |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $145M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.54x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SIG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SIG five years ago would be worth $14,239 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,008 for BGI. Over the past 12 months, SIG leads with a +46.2% total return vs BGI's -24.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SIG at 9.0% vs BGI's -58.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.4% | +2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.2% | +46.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.9% | +29.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.9% | +42.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.2% | -9.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.6% | +9.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BGI and SIG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BGI is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SIG's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIG currently trades 79.4% from its 52-week high vs BGI's 43.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.57 | $110.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.56 | $59.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.1% | +79.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.6 | 38.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 915K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $110.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SIG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BGI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
BGI vs SIG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BGI or SIG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Birks Group Inc.
(BGI) is the stronger pick with -4. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG). Analysts rate Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) a "Hold" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BGI or SIG?
Over the past 5 years, Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) delivered a total return of +42.
4%, compared to -59. 9% for Birks Group Inc. (BGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BGI returned +38. 2% versus SIG's -9. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BGI or SIG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Birks Group Inc.
(BGI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Signet Jewelers Limited's 1. 74β — meaning SIG is approximately 108% more volatile than BGI relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — BGI or SIG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Birks Group Inc.
(BGI) is pulling ahead at -4. 0% versus -100. 0% for Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Signet Jewelers Limited grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -179. 2% for Birks Group Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BGI or SIG?
Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -7. 2% for Birks Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIG leads at 0. 0% versus -3. 1% for BGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BGI leads at 37. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BGI or SIG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BGI or SIG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Birks Group Inc.
(BGI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83)). Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BGI: +38. 2%, SIG: -9. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BGI and SIG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare SIG vs BIRK
BIRK is one of the most direct listed alternatives to SIG.
Compare BGI vs CPRI
CPRI overlaps with BGI in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With PVH + CPRI
PVH and CPRI are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.