Luxury Goods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BGI vs SIG vs CPRI vs RL vs TPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Luxury Goods
Luxury Goods
Apparel - Manufacturers
Luxury Goods
BGI vs SIG vs CPRI vs RL vs TPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Luxury Goods | Luxury Goods | Apparel - Manufacturers | Luxury Goods |
| Market Cap | $13M | $3.55B | $2.23B | $47.87B | $26.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $348M | $0.00 | $3.71B | $7.83B | $7.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $0.00 | $-504M | $919M | $663M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | — | 61.4% | 69.6% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | — | -1.8% | 15.0% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.3x | 13.4x | 21.7x | 20.1x |
| Total Debt | $145M | $0.00 | $3.10B | $2.67B | $3.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | — | $166M | $1.92B | $1.10B |
BGI vs SIG vs CPRI vs RL vs TPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birks Group Inc. (BGI) | 100 | 114.2 | +14.2% |
| Signet Jewelers Lim… (SIG) | 100 | 834.0 | +734.0% |
| Capri Holdings Limi… (CPRI) | 100 | 124.3 | +24.3% |
| Ralph Lauren Corpor… (RL) | 100 | 468.2 | +368.2% |
| Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) | 100 | 959.7 | +859.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BGI vs SIG vs CPRI vs RL vs TPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BGI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.83 vs CPRI's 2.03
SIG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 20.1x)
Among these 5 stocks, CPRI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.50, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 19.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- 319.2% 10Y total return vs TPR's 249.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.50, current ratio 1.78x
TPR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.53, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.87x
- +76.7% vs BGI's -24.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.7% revenue growth vs SIG's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.7% margin vs CPRI's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs CPRI's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs TPR's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.7% vs BGI's -24.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs CPRI's -15.1%, ROIC 20.6% vs -13.6% |
BGI vs SIG vs CPRI vs RL vs TPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BGI vs SIG vs CPRI vs RL vs TPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TPR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CPRI leads 1 • RL leads 1 • BGI leads 0 • SIG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPR and SIG operate at a comparable scale, with $7.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. RL is the more profitable business, keeping 11.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPRI's -13.6%. On growth, TPR holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $348M | $0 | $3.7B | $7.8B | $7.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $0 | $72M | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $0 | -$504M | $919M | $663M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | -$2M | $491M | $695M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | — | +61.4% | +69.6% | +76.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | — | -1.8% | +15.0% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | — | -13.6% | +11.7% | +8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | — | +13.2% | +8.9% | +22.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.8% | -2.9% | -18.7% | +12.2% | +21.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -104.6% | -146.7% | +120.8% | +24.7% | +73.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CPRI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.5x trailing earnings, RL trades at a 81% valuation discount to TPR's 159.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RL's 42.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BGI's 73.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $3.6B | $2.2B | $47.9B | $26.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $119M | $3.6B | $5.2B | $48.6B | $29.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.40x | — | -1.87x | 30.45x | 159.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.29x | 13.36x | 21.72x | 20.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.65x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 73.82x | — | — | 42.21x | 46.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | — | 0.50x | 6.76x | 3.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 5.94x | 8.74x | 33.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.55x | 46.98x | 24.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPR delivers a 106.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $106 in annual profit, vs $-5 for CPRI. RL carries lower financial leverage with a 1.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPRI's 8.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RL scores 8/9 vs SIG's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | -4.7% | +31.8% | +106.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.8% | — | -15.1% | +11.8% | +10.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.0% | — | -13.6% | +20.6% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | — | -17.0% | +18.6% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 8.34x | 1.03x | 4.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $144M | $0 | $2.9B | $746M | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | — | $166M | $1.9B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $145M | $0 | $3.1B | $2.7B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.54x | — | — | 23.25x | 15.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TPR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TPR five years ago would be worth $27,834 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,141 for CPRI. Over the past 12 months, TPR leads with a +76.7% total return vs BGI's -24.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPR at 51.9% vs BGI's -58.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.4% | +3.0% | -23.4% | -2.2% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.1% | +42.9% | +18.4% | +48.6% | +76.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | +30.0% | -50.5% | +225.3% | +250.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.0% | +43.1% | -68.6% | +164.4% | +178.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | -8.9% | -63.1% | +319.2% | +249.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.4% | +9.1% | -20.9% | +48.2% | +51.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BGI and RL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BGI is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CPRI's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RL currently trades 89.9% from its 52-week high vs BGI's 43.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.74x | 2.03x | 1.50x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.57 | $110.20 | $28.27 | $393.41 | $161.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.56 | $61.50 | $15.37 | $237.83 | $73.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.7% | +79.8% | +66.1% | +89.9% | +80.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.8 | 48.7 | 47.3 | 54.8 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 919K | 2.5M | 532K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RL and TPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIG as "Hold", CPRI as "Hold", RL as "Buy", TPR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.5% upside for CPRI (target: $25) vs 21.3% for RL (target: $429). For income investors, TPR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.03% vs RL's 0.89%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $110.00 | $25.33 | $428.75 | $162.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 30 | 53 | 48 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.9% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | — | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.14 | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +1.0% | +7.6% |
TPR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CPRI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BGI vs SIG vs CPRI vs RL vs TPR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BGI or SIG or CPRI or RL or TPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the stronger pick with 6.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG). Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) offers the better valuation at 30. 5x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BGI or SIG or CPRI or RL or TPR?
On trailing P/E, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the cheapest at 30.
5x versus Tapestry, Inc. at 159. 2x. On forward P/E, Signet Jewelers Limited is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BGI or SIG or CPRI or RL or TPR?
Over the past 5 years, Tapestry, Inc.
(TPR) delivered a total return of +178. 3%, compared to -68. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RL returned +319. 2% versus CPRI's -63. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BGI or SIG or CPRI or RL or TPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Birks Group Inc.
(BGI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Capri Holdings Limited's 2. 03β — meaning CPRI is approximately 143% more volatile than BGI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 103% versus 8% for Capri Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BGI or SIG or CPRI or RL or TPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is pulling ahead at 6.
7% versus -100. 0% for Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Signet Jewelers Limited grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -179. 2% for Birks Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RL leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BGI or SIG or CPRI or RL or TPR?
Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus -26. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RL leads at 13. 2% versus -16. 9% for CPRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPR leads at 75. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BGI or SIG or CPRI or RL or TPR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) trades at 9.
3x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Ralph Lauren Corporation — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPRI: 35. 5% to $25. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — BGI or SIG or CPRI or RL or TPR?
In this comparison, TPR (1.
0% yield), RL (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. BGI, SIG, CPRI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BGI or SIG or CPRI or RL or TPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
9% yield, +319. 2% 10Y return). Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RL: +319. 2%, CPRI: -63. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BGI and SIG and CPRI and RL and TPR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
RL, TPR pay a dividend while BGI, SIG, CPRI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.