Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
BGL logo
BGL
LIN logo
LIN
JPM logo
JPM
BAC logo
BAC
APD logo
APD
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BGL vs LIN vs JPM vs BAC vs APD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BGL
Blue Gold Limited

Gold

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$4M
5Y Perf.-99.1%
LIN
Linde plc

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$237.33B
5Y Perf.+9.2%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$908.57B
5Y Perf.+12.2%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$424.14B
5Y Perf.+18.8%
APD
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$62.39B
5Y Perf.-0.7%

BGL vs LIN vs JPM vs BAC vs APD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BGL logoBGL
LIN logoLIN
JPM logoJPM
BAC logoBAC
APD logoAPD
IndustryGoldChemicals - SpecialtyBanks - DiversifiedBanks - DiversifiedChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$4M$237.33B$908.57B$424.14B$62.39B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$34.66B$280.33B$191.57B$12.46B
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$7.13B$57.05B$30.51B$2.11B
Gross Margin46.0%60.0%56.1%32.0%
Operating Margin28.8%25.9%19.7%18.4%
Forward P/E5.6x28.6x14.6x12.6x21.2x
Total Debt$1M$26.99B$942.38B$365.90B$18.41B
Cash & Equiv.$43K$5.06B$343.34B$231.84B$1.86B

BGL vs LIN vs JPM vs BAC vs APDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BGL
LIN
JPM
BAC
APD
StockJun 25Jun 26Return
Blue Gold Limited (BGL)1000.9-99.1%
Linde plc (LIN)100109.2+9.2%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100112.2+12.2%
Bank of America Cor… (BAC)100118.8+18.8%
Air Products and Ch… (APD)10099.3-0.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BGL vs LIN vs JPM vs BAC vs APD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LIN and BAC are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Bank of America Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. BGL, JPM, and APD also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BGL
Blue Gold Limited
The Quality Compounder

BGL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.

  • 57.0% margin vs BAC's 15.9%
Best for: quality
LIN
Linde plc
The Growth Play

LIN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 7.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 67.9%, current ratio 0.88x
  • Beta 0.18 vs BGL's 2.13, lower leverage
  • 8.3% ROA vs BGL's -56.7%, ROIC 11.3% vs -5.9%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 481.2% 10Y total return vs LIN's 393.9%
  • NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
  • 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs APD's -0.5%
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
The Banking Pick

BAC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 0.82 vs LIN's 1.13
  • Lower P/E (12.6x vs 21.2x)
  • +27.2% vs BGL's -98.1%
Best for: valuation efficiency
APD
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
The Income Pick

APD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 43 yrs, beta 0.32, yield 2.5%
  • Beta 0.32, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.38x
  • 2.5% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJPM logoJPM3.3% NII/revenue growth vs APD's -0.5%
ValueBAC logoBACLower P/E (12.6x vs 21.2x)
Quality / MarginsBGL logoBGL57.0% margin vs BAC's 15.9%
Stability / SafetyLIN logoLINBeta 0.18 vs BGL's 2.13, lower leverage
DividendsAPD logoAPD2.5% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BAC logoBAC+27.2% vs BGL's -98.1%
Efficiency (ROA)LIN logoLIN8.3% ROA vs BGL's -56.7%, ROIC 11.3% vs -5.9%

BGL vs LIN vs JPM vs BAC vs APD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BGLBlue Gold Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

LINLinde plc
FY 2025
Americas Segment
45.9%$15.2B
EMEA Segment
25.8%$8.5B
APAC Segment
20.1%$6.7B
Engineering Segment
8.2%$2.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
BACBank of America Corporation
FY 2024
Loans and Leases
32.2%$62.0B
other interest income
14.7%$28.3B
Debt securities
13.5%$26.0B
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
10.3%$19.9B
Investment And Brokerage Services
9.2%$17.8B
Market making and similar activities
6.7%$13.0B
Trading account assets
5.4%$10.4B
Other (4)
7.8%$15.1B
APDAir Products and Chemicals, Inc.
FY 2025
On-site
51.3%$6.2B
Merchant
44.3%$5.3B
Sale of Equipment
4.3%$520M

BGL vs LIN vs JPM vs BAC vs APD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLINLAGGINGBGL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LIN and JPM and APD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and BGL operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 20.6% (LIN) to 15.9% (BAC).

MetricBGL logoBGLBlue Gold LimitedLIN logoLINLinde plcJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…APD logoAPDAir Products and …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$34.7B$280.3B$191.6B$12.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M$12.1B$81.4B$40.0B$3.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M$7.1B$57.0B$30.5B$2.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$793,440$5.1B$100.9B$12.6B$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+46.0%+60.0%+56.1%+32.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+28.8%+25.9%+19.7%+18.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+20.6%+20.4%+15.9%+16.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.7%+36.0%+6.6%+8.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.2%+8.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+114.9%+13.4%+16.0%+18.3%+141.1%
Evenly matched — LIN and JPM and APD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BAC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.6x trailing earnings, BGL trades at a 84% valuation discount to LIN's 35.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs LIN's 1.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBGL logoBGLBlue Gold LimitedLIN logoLINLinde plcJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…APD logoAPDAir Products and …
Market CapShares × price$4M$237.3B$908.6B$424.1B$62.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5M$259.3B$1.51T$558.2B$78.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.63x35.10x16.22x14.71x-158.31x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.28.61x14.60x12.60x21.22x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.38x0.92x0.96x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.41x20.42x18.52x13.95x114.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.98x3.25x2.21x5.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.97x6.04x2.51x1.40x3.60x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF46.64x9.01x33.63x
BAC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-172 for BGL. LIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs APD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBGL logoBGLBlue Gold LimitedLIN logoLINLinde plcJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…APD logoAPDAir Products and …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-171.6%+17.8%+15.9%+10.1%+11.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-56.7%+8.3%+1.3%+0.9%+5.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.9%+11.3%+4.5%+3.5%-2.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.9%+13.0%+8.9%+4.5%-2.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926572
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.00x0.68x2.60x1.21x1.06x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1M$21.9B$599.0B$134.1B$16.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$43,499$5.1B$343.3B$231.8B$1.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$27.0B$942.4B$365.9B$18.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-38.74x34.52x0.74x0.48x12.00x
LIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $189 for BGL. Over the past 12 months, BAC leads with a +27.2% total return vs BGL's -98.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs BGL's -73.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBGL logoBGLBlue Gold LimitedLIN logoLINLinde plcJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…APD logoAPDAir Products and …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-83.4%+20.1%+0.8%+1.4%+13.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-98.1%+13.0%+20.9%+27.2%+4.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.1%+43.6%+138.8%+105.5%+4.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.1%+91.1%+135.5%+57.4%+7.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.1%+393.9%+481.2%+371.6%+152.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-73.3%+12.8%+33.7%+27.1%+1.4%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BGL's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIN currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs BGL's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBGL logoBGLBlue Gold LimitedLIN logoLINLinde plcJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…APD logoAPDAir Products and …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.13x0.18x0.87x0.83x0.32x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$166.50$525.87$338.09$57.98$307.96
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.38$387.78$269.72$44.21$229.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.2%+97.4%+96.2%+96.9%+91.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10024.655.072.170.945.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded404K2.1M7.4M32.4M996K
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

APD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LIN as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", APD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.2% upside for APD (target: $326) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, APD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.54% vs LIN's 1.17%.

MetricBGL logoBGLBlue Gold LimitedLIN logoLINLinde plcJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…APD logoAPDAir Products and …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$562.14$339.75$61.13$325.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts28615442
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+1.8%+2.3%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises34151243
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.00$5.95$1.27$7.11
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+100.0%+1.9%+3.8%+5.1%0.0%
APD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). BAC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallLinde plc (LIN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BGL vs LIN vs JPM vs BAC vs APD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BGL or LIN or JPM or BAC or APD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD). Blue Gold Limited (BGL) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Linde plc (LIN) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BGL or LIN or JPM or BAC or APD?

On trailing P/E, Blue Gold Limited (BGL) is the cheapest at 5.

6x versus Linde plc at 35. 1x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank of America Corporation wins at 0. 82x versus Linde plc's 1. 13x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BGL or LIN or JPM or BAC or APD?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -98. 1% for Blue Gold Limited (BGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus BGL's -98. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BGL or LIN or JPM or BAC or APD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

18β versus Blue Gold Limited's 2. 13β — meaning BGL is approximately 1100% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Linde plc (LIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BGL or LIN or JPM or BAC or APD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -0. 5% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bank of America Corporation grew EPS 18. 6% year-over-year, compared to -110. 3% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BGL or LIN or JPM or BAC or APD?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -3. 3% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus -7. 3% for APD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BGL or LIN or JPM or BAC or APD more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus Linde plc's 1. 13x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 28. 6x for Linde plc — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APD: 16. 2% to $325. 63.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BGL or LIN or JPM or BAC or APD?

In this comparison, APD (2.

5% yield), BAC (2. 3% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield), LIN (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BGL or LIN or JPM or BAC or APD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

18), 1. 2% yield, +393. 9% 10Y return). Blue Gold Limited (BGL) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +393. 9%, BGL: -98. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BGL and LIN and JPM and BAC and APD?

These companies operate in different sectors (BGL (Basic Materials) and LIN (Basic Materials) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services) and APD (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BGL is a small-cap deep-value stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; APD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. LIN, JPM, BAC, APD pay a dividend while BGL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.