Gold
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BGL vs XYL vs PNR vs FELE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
BGL vs XYL vs PNR vs FELE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $12M | $27.04B | $12.41B | $4.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $9.09B | $4.20B | $2.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $973M | $671M | $150M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.6% | 40.9% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 13.6% | 20.6% | 12.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 20.6x | 14.4x | 21.6x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $1.94B | $1.64B | $280M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43K | $1.48B | $102M | $100M |
BGL vs XYL vs PNR vs FELE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Gold Limited (BGL) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
| Xylem Inc. (XYL) | 100 | 87.9 | -12.1% |
| Pentair plc (PNR) | 100 | 74.8 | -25.2% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 110.7 | +10.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BGL vs XYL vs PNR vs FELE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BGL is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 57.0% margin vs FELE's 6.9%
XYL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 1.4%
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth 7.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.8%
- PEG 0.90 vs FELE's 2.48
- Beta 0.90, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.63x
PNR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 21.6x), PEG 1.10 vs 2.48
- 9.9% ROA vs BGL's -56.7%, ROIC 12.1% vs -5.9%
FELE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 229.5% 10Y total return vs XYL's 200.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.89 vs BGL's 2.14, lower leverage
- +14.9% vs BGL's -94.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 21.6x), PEG 1.10 vs 2.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | 57.0% margin vs FELE's 6.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs BGL's 2.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.9% vs BGL's -94.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.9% ROA vs BGL's -56.7%, ROIC 12.1% vs -5.9% |
BGL vs XYL vs PNR vs FELE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BGL vs XYL vs PNR vs FELE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PNR leads in 2 of 6 categories
FELE leads 2 • BGL leads 0 • XYL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XYL and BGL operate at a comparable scale, with $9.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. PNR is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FELE's 6.9%. On growth, FELE holds the edge at +9.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $9.1B | $4.2B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $1.8B | $983M | $322M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $973M | $671M | $150M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$793,440 | $966M | $716M | $169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +38.6% | +40.9% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +13.6% | +20.6% | +12.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +10.7% | +16.0% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +10.6% | +17.0% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.7% | +2.6% | +9.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +114.9% | +14.5% | +12.9% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — XYL and PNR and FELE each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.4x trailing earnings, BGL trades at a 46% valuation discount to FELE's 30.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XYL offers better value at 1.27x vs FELE's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12M | $27.0B | $12.4B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $27.5B | $14.0B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.42x | 29.02x | 19.40x | 30.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.56x | 14.35x | 21.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.27x | 1.48x | 3.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.67x | 15.29x | 14.31x | 13.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.99x | 2.97x | 2.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.67x | 2.36x | 3.29x | 3.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.71x | 16.64x | 22.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PNR leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PNR delivers a 17.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-172 for BGL. XYL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BGL's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs BGL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -171.6% | +8.5% | +17.7% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -56.7% | +5.6% | +9.9% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.9% | +7.6% | +12.1% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.9% | +8.5% | +15.0% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 0.17x | 0.42x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $463M | $1.5B | $181M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43,499 | $1.5B | $102M | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $1.9B | $1.6B | $280M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -38.74x | 49.32x | 11.94x | 24.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FELE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FELE five years ago would be worth $12,157 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $552 for BGL. Over the past 12 months, FELE leads with a +14.9% total return vs BGL's -94.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PNR at 10.8% vs BGL's -61.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.7% | -16.7% | -26.7% | +3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.5% | -6.4% | -16.8% | +14.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | +10.1% | +36.1% | +9.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | +0.6% | +17.9% | +21.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | +200.2% | +121.3% | +229.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -61.9% | +3.3% | +10.8% | +3.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FELE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FELE is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BGL's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FELE currently trades 89.1% from its 52-week high vs BGL's 0.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.14x | 0.90x | 1.21x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $166.50 | $154.27 | $113.95 | $111.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $113.46 | $76.69 | $83.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.7% | +73.7% | +67.4% | +89.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 40.4 | 33.7 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 430K | 2.1M | 1.6M | 275K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XYL and FELE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XYL as "Hold", PNR as "Hold", FELE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.8% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs 0.7% for FELE (target: $100). For income investors, XYL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.41% vs FELE's 1.11%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $151.57 | $113.56 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 40 | 41 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.4% | +1.3% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 | 6 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.60 | $0.99 | $1.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | +0.1% | +1.8% | +3.8% |
PNR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FELE leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
BGL vs XYL vs PNR vs FELE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BGL or XYL or PNR or FELE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xylem Inc.
(XYL) is the stronger pick with 5. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). Blue Gold Limited (BGL) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xylem Inc. (XYL) a "Hold" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BGL or XYL or PNR or FELE?
On trailing P/E, Blue Gold Limited (BGL) is the cheapest at 16.
4x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. at 30. 6x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Xylem Inc. wins at 0. 90x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BGL or XYL or PNR or FELE?
Over the past 5 years, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) delivered a total return of +21. 6%, compared to -94. 5% for Blue Gold Limited (BGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FELE returned +229. 5% versus BGL's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BGL or XYL or PNR or FELE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Blue Gold Limited's 2. 14β — meaning BGL is approximately 142% more volatile than FELE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xylem Inc. (XYL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 100% for Blue Gold Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BGL or XYL or PNR or FELE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xylem Inc.
(XYL) is pulling ahead at 5. 5% versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xylem Inc. grew EPS 7. 4% year-over-year, compared to -70. 6% for Blue Gold Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, XYL leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BGL or XYL or PNR or FELE?
Pentair plc (PNR) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Blue Gold Limited — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PNR leads at 20. 5% versus 0. 0% for BGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PNR leads at 40. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BGL or XYL or PNR or FELE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Xylem Inc. (XYL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 6x for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. — 7. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 47. 8% to $113. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — BGL or XYL or PNR or FELE?
In this comparison, XYL (1.
4% yield), PNR (1. 3% yield), FELE (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BGL or XYL or PNR or FELE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 1. 1% yield, +229. 5% 10Y return). Blue Gold Limited (BGL) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FELE: +229. 5%, BGL: -94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BGL and XYL and PNR and FELE?
These companies operate in different sectors (BGL (Basic Materials) and XYL (Industrials) and PNR (Industrials) and FELE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BGL is a small-cap deep-value stock; XYL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PNR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. XYL, PNR, FELE pay a dividend while BGL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.