Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BGLC vs QDEL vs CLOV vs RNAZ vs AEYE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Biotechnology
Software - Application
BGLC vs QDEL vs CLOV vs RNAZ vs AEYE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Biotechnology | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $4M | $733M | $1.44B | $7M | $100M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $2.66B | $2.21B | $0.00 | $40M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-1.21B | $-57M | $-27M | $-3M |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | 56.6% | 42.5% | — | 78.3% |
| Operating Margin | -24.8% | -37.0% | -2.6% | — | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.4x | 88.1x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $211K | $2.80B | $0.00 | $38K | $721K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $170M | $78M | $6M | $5M |
BGLC vs QDEL vs CLOV vs RNAZ vs AEYE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BioNexus Gene Lab C… (BGLC) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| QuidelOrtho Corpora… (QDEL) | 100 | 7.6 | -92.4% |
| Clover Health Inves… (CLOV) | 100 | 38.7 | -61.3% |
| TransCode Therapeut… (RNAZ) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 56.7 | -43.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BGLC vs QDEL vs CLOV vs RNAZ vs AEYE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BGLC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 3.81x
QDEL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
CLOV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 40.3%, EPS growth -93.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.6%
- 40.3% revenue growth vs RNAZ's -87.4%
RNAZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.95, current ratio 2.56x
- -0.4% margin vs QDEL's -45.6%
- Beta 0.95 vs QDEL's 2.59
- -19.6% vs QDEL's -58.3%
AEYE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.29
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs QDEL's -34.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.3% revenue growth vs RNAZ's -87.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.4% margin vs QDEL's -45.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs QDEL's 2.59 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -19.6% vs QDEL's -58.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.5% ROA vs BGLC's -30.1% |
BGLC vs QDEL vs CLOV vs RNAZ vs AEYE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BGLC vs QDEL vs CLOV vs RNAZ vs AEYE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLOV leads in 2 of 6 categories
QDEL leads 1 • AEYE leads 1 • BGLC leads 0 • RNAZ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLOV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QDEL and RNAZ operate at a comparable scale, with $2.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. CLOV is the more profitable business, keeping -2.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QDEL's -45.6%. On growth, CLOV holds the edge at +62.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $2.7B | $2.2B | $0 | $40M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$649M | -$55M | -$17M | -$504,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$1.2B | -$57M | -$27M | -$3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$75M | $55M | -$15M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +56.6% | +42.5% | — | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.8% | -37.0% | -2.6% | — | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.3% | -45.6% | -2.6% | — | -7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -30.5% | -2.8% | +2.5% | — | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | -10.5% | +62.0% | — | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.0% | -6.1% | — | -380.7% | +29.0% |
Valuation Metrics
QDEL leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $733M | $1.4B | $7M | $100M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$429,948 | $3.4B | $1.4B | $896,691 | $96M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.31x | -0.65x | -16.59x | -0.17x | -32.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.45x | 88.14x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.39x | 0.27x | 0.75x | — | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | 0.38x | 4.72x | — | 20.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BGLC and QDEL and CLOV and RNAZ each lead in 2 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RNAZ delivers a -1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-56 for QDEL. BGLC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QDEL's 1.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QDEL scores 6/9 vs CLOV's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.7% | -56.3% | -17.1% | -1.9% | -47.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.1% | -20.7% | -9.6% | -0.5% | -9.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.4% | -13.6% | -34.0% | — | -42.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -17.2% | -18.0% | -24.5% | -5.1% | -17.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.46x | — | — | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $2.6B | -$78M | -$6M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $170M | $78M | $6M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $210,557 | $2.8B | $0 | $38,291 | $721,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.94x | -5.18x | — | -3431.07x | -2.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLOV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEYE five years ago would be worth $3,977 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for RNAZ. Over the past 12 months, RNAZ leads with a -19.6% total return vs QDEL's -58.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLOV at 47.6% vs RNAZ's -96.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.2% | -62.6% | +17.0% | +8.1% | -18.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.1% | -58.3% | -25.2% | -19.6% | -27.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.7% | -87.8% | +221.7% | -100.0% | +20.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -91.1% | -67.3% | -100.0% | -60.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -34.9% | -72.4% | -100.0% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.5% | -50.4% | +47.6% | -96.3% | +6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLOV and RNAZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNAZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QDEL's 2.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLOV currently trades 71.9% from its 52-week high vs BGLC's 13.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.56x | 2.28x | 1.26x | 0.80x | 2.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.60 | $38.99 | $3.92 | $20.99 | $16.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.92 | $10.22 | $1.58 | $6.08 | $5.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.3% | +27.6% | +71.9% | +38.1% | +49.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.3 | 35.2 | 69.5 | 31.2 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 2.2M | 5.6M | 8K | 194K |
Analyst Outlook
AEYE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QDEL as "Buy", CLOV as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for QDEL (target: $17) vs 18.1% for CLOV (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 | $3.33 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 9 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLOV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). QDEL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BGLC vs QDEL vs CLOV vs RNAZ vs AEYE: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BGLC or QDEL or CLOV or RNAZ or AEYE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clover Health Investments, Corp.
(CLOV) is the stronger pick with 40. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 7% for BioNexus Gene Lab Corp. (BGLC). Analysts rate QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BGLC or QDEL or CLOV or RNAZ or AEYE?
Over the past 5 years, AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) delivered a total return of -60. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for TransCode Therapeutics, Inc. (RNAZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +96. 5% versus RNAZ's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BGLC or QDEL or CLOV or RNAZ or AEYE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TransCode Therapeutics, Inc.
(RNAZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus QuidelOrtho Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning QDEL is approximately 186% more volatile than RNAZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioNexus Gene Lab Corp. (BGLC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 146% for QuidelOrtho Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BGLC or QDEL or CLOV or RNAZ or AEYE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clover Health Investments, Corp.
(CLOV) is pulling ahead at 40. 3% versus -2. 7% for BioNexus Gene Lab Corp. (BGLC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransCode Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 98. 6% year-over-year, compared to -93. 6% for Clover Health Investments, Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLOV leads at 20. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BGLC or QDEL or CLOV or RNAZ or AEYE?
TransCode Therapeutics, Inc.
(RNAZ) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -41. 5% for QuidelOrtho Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNAZ leads at 0. 0% versus -33. 7% for QDEL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BGLC or QDEL or CLOV or RNAZ or AEYE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) trades at 6.
4x forward P/E versus 88. 1x for Clover Health Investments, Corp. — 81. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QDEL: 57. 8% to $17. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BGLC or QDEL or CLOV or RNAZ or AEYE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BGLC or QDEL or CLOV or RNAZ or AEYE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransCode Therapeutics, Inc.
(RNAZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80)). QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNAZ: -100. 0%, QDEL: -34. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BGLC and QDEL and CLOV and RNAZ and AEYE?
These companies operate in different sectors (BGLC (Healthcare) and QDEL (Healthcare) and CLOV (Healthcare) and RNAZ (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BGLC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QDEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLOV is a small-cap high-growth stock; RNAZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.