Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BGS vs CENT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BGS
B&G Foods, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$430M
5Y Perf.-76.8%
CENT
Central Garden & Pet Company

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.29B
5Y Perf.+28.2%

BGS vs CENT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BGS logoBGS
CENT logoCENT
IndustryPackaged FoodsPackaged Foods
Market Cap$430M$2.29B
Revenue (TTM)$1.83B$3.16B
Net Income (TTM)$-43M$171M
Gross Margin21.8%32.2%
Operating Margin5.3%8.2%
Forward P/E9.6x13.0x
Total Debt$2.00B$1.44B
Cash & Equiv.$56M$882M

BGS vs CENTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BGS
CENT
StockMay 20May 26Return
B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS)10023.2-76.8%
Central Garden & Pe… (CENT)100128.2+28.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BGS vs CENT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CENT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. B&G Foods, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BGS
B&G Foods, Inc.
The Income Pick

BGS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.40
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.40, current ratio 3.53x
  • Beta 0.40, current ratio 3.53x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CENT
Central Garden & Pet Company
The Growth Play

CENT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth -2.2%, EPS growth 57.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.1%
  • 148.2% 10Y total return vs BGS's -53.1%
  • -2.2% revenue growth vs BGS's -5.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCENT logoCENT-2.2% revenue growth vs BGS's -5.4%
ValueBGS logoBGSLower P/E (9.6x vs 13.0x)
Quality / MarginsCENT logoCENT5.4% margin vs BGS's -2.4%
Stability / SafetyBGS logoBGSBeta 0.40 vs CENT's 0.65
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CENT logoCENT+6.6% vs BGS's -2.7%
Efficiency (ROA)CENT logoCENT4.7% ROA vs BGS's -1.5%, ROIC 9.1% vs 2.9%

BGS vs CENT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BGSB&G Foods, Inc.
FY 2025
Specialty Segment
58.6%$630M
Meals Segment
41.4%$444M
CENTCentral Garden & Pet Company
FY 2025
Pet Products Segment
57.6%$1.8B
Garden Products Segment
42.4%$1.3B

BGS vs CENT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCENTLAGGINGBGS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CENT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

CENT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 1.7x BGS's $1.8B. CENT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BGS's -2.4%. On growth, CENT holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBGS logoBGSB&G Foods, Inc.CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.8B$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$157M$302M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$43M$171M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$79M$282M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.8%+32.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.3%+8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.4%+5.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.3%+8.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.2%+8.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+93.2%+30.6%
CENT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BGS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CENT's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BGS's 24.4x.

MetricBGS logoBGSB&G Foods, Inc.CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
Market CapShares × price$430M$2.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.4B$2.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-9.96x14.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.57x12.95x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.82x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple24.45x8.15x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.24x0.73x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.95x1.48x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.08x7.88x
BGS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CENT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

CENT delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-9 for BGS. CENT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BGS's 4.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CENT scores 8/9 vs BGS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBGS logoBGSB&G Foods, Inc.CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-8.9%+10.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.5%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.9%+9.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.6%+8.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–948
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage4.42x0.91x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.9B$558M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$56M$882M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.0B$1.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.67x1200.51x
CENT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CENT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CENT five years ago would be worth $7,926 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,674 for BGS. Over the past 12 months, CENT leads with a +6.6% total return vs BGS's -2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CENT at 7.8% vs BGS's -20.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBGS logoBGSB&G Foods, Inc.CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+32.6%+15.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-2.7%+6.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-50.1%+25.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.3%-20.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-53.1%+148.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-20.7%+7.8%
CENT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BGS and CENT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BGS is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CENT's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CENT currently trades 89.3% from its 52-week high vs BGS's 83.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBGS logoBGSB&G Foods, Inc.CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.40x0.65x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.47$41.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.67$28.77
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.2%+89.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.541.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M73K
Evenly matched — BGS and CENT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CENT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates BGS as "Hold" and CENT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.5% upside for CENT (target: $51) vs 2.2% for BGS (target: $6).

MetricBGS logoBGSB&G Foods, Inc.CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.50$51.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1710
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+6.8%
CENT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CENT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BGS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallCentral Garden & Pet Company (CENT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BGS vs CENT: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BGS or CENT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the stronger pick with -2.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS). Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BGS or CENT?

On forward P/E, B&G Foods, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BGS or CENT?

Over the past 5 years, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) delivered a total return of -20.

7%, compared to -63. 3% for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CENT returned +148. 2% versus BGS's -53. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BGS or CENT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), B&G Foods, Inc.

(BGS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Central Garden & Pet Company's 0. 65β — meaning CENT is approximately 62% more volatile than BGS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 91% versus 4% for B&G Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BGS or CENT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is pulling ahead at -2.

2% versus -5. 4% for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: B&G Foods, Inc. grew EPS 83. 0% year-over-year, compared to 57. 4% for Central Garden & Pet Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CENT leads at -2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BGS or CENT?

Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

2% net margin versus -2. 4% for B&G Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CENT leads at 8. 5% versus 5. 3% for BGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CENT leads at 31. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BGS or CENT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, B&G Foods, Inc.

(BGS) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for Central Garden & Pet Company — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CENT: 38. 5% to $51. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BGS or CENT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is BGS or CENT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, B&G Foods, Inc.

(BGS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BGS: -53. 1%, CENT: +148. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BGS and CENT?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BGS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CENT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BGS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CENT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BGS and CENT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BGS: -2.2% · CENT: 8.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.