BHAT
Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Market Cap$36K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BHAT vs CNET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
Advertising Agencies
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-96.2%
BHAT vs CNET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BHAT | CNET |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $36K | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $6M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | -0.3% | 4.8% |
| Operating Margin | -42.5% | -31.7% |
| Total Debt | $3M | $122K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14K | $812K |
BHAT vs CNET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BHAT
CNET
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujian Blue Hat Int… (BHAT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET) | 100 | 3.8 | -96.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BHAT vs CNET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CNET leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BHAT
Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd.
The Niche Pick
BHAT is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -20.0% ROA vs CNET's -21.3%, ROIC -8.5% vs -64.7%
Best for: efficiency
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
The Income Pick
CNET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.18
- Rev growth -49.5%, EPS growth -124.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -31.2%
- -97.8% 10Y total return vs BHAT's -100.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CNET | -49.5% revenue growth vs BHAT's -74.6% |
| Quality / Margins | CNET | -33.4% margin vs BHAT's -36.0% |
| Stability / Safety | CNET | Beta 1.18 vs BHAT's 1.88, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CNET | -55.1% vs BHAT's -99.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BHAT | -20.0% ROA vs CNET's -21.3%, ROIC -8.5% vs -64.7% |
BHAT vs CNET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2023
FY 2024
BHAT vs CNET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCNETLAGGINGBHAT
BHATFujian Blue Hat Inter…
1leads
CNETZW Data Action Techno…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BHATMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CNET5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BHAT2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CNET6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CNET2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNET leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BHAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $36M annually — 5.9x CNET's $6M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -33.4% (CNET) to -36.0% (BHAT). On growth, BHAT holds the edge at +103.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | CNETZW Data Action Te… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $6M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +4.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.5% | -31.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.0% | -33.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.9% | -27.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.8% | -47.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.9% | +95.7% |
CNET leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BHAT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | CNETZW Data Action Te… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35,893 | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $1M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | -0.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
BHAT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BHAT and CNET each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BHAT delivers a -27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-27 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. CNET carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BHAT's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNET scores 5/9 vs BHAT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | CNETZW Data Action Te… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.0% | -60.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.0% | -21.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.5% | -64.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.4% | -73.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$690,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14,300 | $812,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $122,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -116.06x | — |
Evenly matched — BHAT and CNET each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNET leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNET five years ago would be worth $206 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for BHAT. Over the past 12 months, CNET leads with a -55.1% total return vs BHAT's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNET at -52.1% vs BHAT's -97.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | CNETZW Data Action Te… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -99.9% | -44.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -55.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -89.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -97.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -97.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -97.6% | -52.1% |
CNET leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNET is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BHAT's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNET currently trades 25.2% from its 52-week high vs BHAT's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | CNETZW Data Action Te… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $109.50 | $2.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.02 | $0.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +25.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 15.0 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 11K |
CNET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | CNETZW Data Action Te… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CNET leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BHAT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallZW Data Action Technologies… (CNET)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BHAT vs CNET: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BHAT or CNET a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) is the stronger pick with -49. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 6% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. (BHAT). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BHAT or CNET?
Over the past 5 years, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) delivered a total return of -97. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. (BHAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNET returned -97. 8% versus BHAT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BHAT or CNET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. 's 1. 88β — meaning BHAT is approximately 60% more volatile than CNET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 9% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BHAT or CNET?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) is pulling ahead at -49. 5% versus -74. 6% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. (BHAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. grew EPS -124. 1% year-over-year, compared to -4666. 6% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BHAT leads at 15. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BHAT or CNET?
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) is the more profitable company, earning -24. 4% net margin versus -50. 9% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. — meaning it keeps -24. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BHAT leads at -23. 8% versus -24. 3% for CNET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BHAT leads at 8. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BHAT or CNET?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BHAT or CNET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18)). Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. (BHAT) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNET: -97. 8%, BHAT: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BHAT and CNET?
These companies operate in different sectors (BHAT (Technology) and CNET (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BHAT: 103.8% · CNET: -47.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.