BHAT
Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Market Cap$36K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BHAT vs NTES
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NTES
NetEase, Inc.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Market Cap$74.15B
5Y Perf.+46.2%
BHAT vs NTES — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BHAT | NTES |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $36K | $74.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $112.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $33.67B |
| Gross Margin | -0.3% | 64.3% |
| Operating Margin | -42.5% | 31.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.9x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $6.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14K | $51.52B |
BHAT vs NTES — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BHAT
NTES
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujian Blue Hat Int… (BHAT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| NetEase, Inc. (NTES) | 100 | 146.2 | +46.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BHAT vs NTES
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NTES leads in 6 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BHAT
Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd.
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, BHAT is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: technology exposure
NTES
NetEase, Inc.
The Income Pick
NTES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.6%
- Rev growth 4.0%, EPS growth 11.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- 375.8% 10Y total return vs BHAT's -100.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NTES | 4.0% revenue growth vs BHAT's -74.6% |
| Quality / Margins | NTES | 30.0% margin vs BHAT's -36.0% |
| Stability / Safety | NTES | Beta 0.74 vs BHAT's 1.88, lower leverage |
| Dividends | NTES | 2.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NTES | +12.8% vs BHAT's -99.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NTES | 15.2% ROA vs BHAT's -20.0%, ROIC 23.3% vs -8.5% |
BHAT vs NTES — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2023
FY 2024
BHAT vs NTES — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNTESLAGGINGBHAT
BHATFujian Blue Hat Inter…
1leads
NTESNetEase, Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BHATMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NTES5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BHAT3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NTES7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NTES6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
NTES2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTES leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTES is the larger business by revenue, generating $112.2B annually — 3085.4x BHAT's $36M. NTES is the more profitable business, keeping 30.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BHAT's -36.0%. On growth, BHAT holds the edge at +103.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | NTESNetEase, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $112.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | $38.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $33.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $48.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +64.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.5% | +31.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.0% | +30.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.9% | +43.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.8% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.9% | -30.4% |
NTES leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BHAT leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | NTESNetEase, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35,893 | $74.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $67.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | 15.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 4.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 3.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.44x |
BHAT leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTES leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTES delivers a 20.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-27 for BHAT. NTES carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BHAT's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTES scores 8/9 vs BHAT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | NTESNetEase, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.0% | +20.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.0% | +15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.5% | +23.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.4% | +22.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$45.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14,300 | $51.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -116.06x | — |
NTES leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTES leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTES five years ago would be worth $11,631 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for BHAT. Over the past 12 months, NTES leads with a +12.8% total return vs BHAT's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTES at 11.2% vs BHAT's -97.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | NTESNetEase, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -99.9% | -19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | +12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +37.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +16.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +375.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -97.6% | +11.2% |
NTES leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTES is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BHAT's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTES currently trades 73.4% from its 52-week high vs BHAT's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | NTESNetEase, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $109.50 | $159.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.02 | $103.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 15.0 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 750K |
NTES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
NTES is the only dividend payer here at 2.62% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | NTESNetEase, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $149.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $20.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
NTES leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BHAT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallNetEase, Inc. (NTES)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BHAT vs NTES: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BHAT or NTES a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is the stronger pick with 4. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 6% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. (BHAT). NetEase, Inc. (NTES) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NetEase, Inc. (NTES) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BHAT or NTES?
Over the past 5 years, NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) delivered a total return of +16. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. (BHAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTES returned +375. 8% versus BHAT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BHAT or NTES?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. 's 1. 88β — meaning BHAT is approximately 153% more volatile than NTES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NetEase, Inc. (NTES) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 9% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BHAT or NTES?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is pulling ahead at 4. 0% versus -74. 6% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. (BHAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NetEase, Inc. grew EPS 11. 0% year-over-year, compared to -4666. 6% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BHAT leads at 15. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BHAT or NTES?
NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 0% net margin versus -50. 9% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. — meaning it keeps 30. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTES leads at 31. 8% versus -23. 8% for BHAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTES leads at 64. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BHAT or NTES?
In this comparison, NTES (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. BHAT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BHAT or NTES better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 2. 6% yield, +375. 8% 10Y return). Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. (BHAT) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTES: +375. 8%, BHAT: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BHAT and NTES?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BHAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTES is a mid-cap deep-value stock. NTES pays a dividend while BHAT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BHAT: 103.8% · NTES: 1.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.