Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BHRB vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
BHRB vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.01B | $184M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $487M | $135M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $117M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 69.1% | 54.3% |
| Operating Margin | 29.7% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.3x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $537M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $26M |
BHRB vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burke & Herbert Fin… (BHRB) | 100 | 155.3 | +55.3% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BHRB vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BHRB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.4%
- Rev growth 23.7%, EPS growth 231.2%
- Beta 0.81, yield 3.4%, current ratio 3.79x
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 135.4% 10Y total return vs BHRB's 80.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 32.0%, current ratio 0.02x
- Beta 0.60 vs BHRB's 0.81, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.7% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 11.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MNSB's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs BHRB's 0.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MNSB's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.2% vs BHRB's +17.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MNSB's 0.4% |
BHRB vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BHRB vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BHRB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BHRB is the larger business by revenue, generating $487M annually — 3.6x MNSB's $135M. BHRB is the more profitable business, keeping 24.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $487M | $135M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $162M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $117M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $96M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.1% | +54.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.8% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
BHRB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, BHRB trades at a 39% valuation discount to MNSB's 14.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BHRB's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNSB's 11.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $184M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $227M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.66x | 14.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.29x | 11.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.47x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.29x | 11.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.05x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.48x | 17.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BHRB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BHRB delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BHRB's 0.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BHRB scores 6/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.63x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $484M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $26M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $537M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.97x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNSB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BHRB five years ago would be worth $15,173 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, MNSB leads with a +37.2% total return vs BHRB's +17.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNSB at 4.2% vs BHRB's -3.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.4% | +26.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.9% | +37.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.8% | +13.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.7% | +18.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.9% | +135.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.0% | +4.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MNSB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BHRB's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs BHRB's 94.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.90 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.40 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.0 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 146K | 45K |
Analyst Outlook
BHRB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BHRB as "Buy" and MNSB as "Hold". For income investors, BHRB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.36% vs MNSB's 1.60%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $74.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.26 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
BHRB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MNSB leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
BHRB vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BHRB or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.
(BHRB) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BHRB or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.
(BHRB) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. at 14. 2x. On forward P/E, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BHRB or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.
(BHRB) delivered a total return of +51. 7%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNSB returned +135. 4% versus BHRB's +80. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BHRB or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. 's 0. 81β — meaning BHRB is approximately 35% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 63% for Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BHRB or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.
(BHRB) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 231. 2% year-over-year, compared to 210. 0% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BHRB or MNSB?
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.
(BHRB) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 9% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BHRB leads at 29. 5% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BHRB leads at 69. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BHRB or MNSB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.
(BHRB) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 11. 0x for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — BHRB or MNSB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 1. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB).
09Is BHRB or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 1. 6% yield, +135. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNSB: +135. 4%, BHRB: +80. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BHRB and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BHRB is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.