Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
BHRB logo
BHRB
NBTB logo
NBTB
CZWI logo
CZWI
FIS logo
FIS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BHRB vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BHRB
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.01B
5Y Perf.+55.3%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%

BHRB vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BHRB logoBHRB
NBTB logoNBTB
CZWI logoCZWI
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$1.01B$2.52B$207M$20.26B
Revenue (TTM)$487M$902M$90M$11.66B
Net Income (TTM)$117M$169M$14M$2.67B
Gross Margin69.1%73.6%54.7%37.6%
Operating Margin29.7%24.3%7.0%17.9%
Forward P/E8.3x11.5x11.8x6.2x
Total Debt$537M$327M$52M$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$53M$185M$119M$599M

BHRB vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BHRB
NBTB
CZWI
FIS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Burke & Herbert Fin… (BHRB)100155.3+55.3%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BHRB vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. CZWI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
BHRB
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.
The Banking Pick

BHRB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.

  • Rev growth 23.7%, EPS growth 231.2%
  • NIM 3.7% vs CZWI's 2.9%
  • 23.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
  • 24.1% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Financial Play

NBTB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 149.0% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 108.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.50 vs BHRB's 0.81, lower leverage
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • PEG 0.26 vs CZWI's 2.32
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.64
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.0%
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBHRB logoBHRB23.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.64
Quality / MarginsBHRB logoBHRB24.1% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
Stability / SafetyCZWI logoCZWIBeta 0.50 vs BHRB's 0.81, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.0%
Momentum (1Y)CZWI logoCZWI+52.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.0%

BHRB vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
BHRBBurke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.
FY 2025
Fiduciary and Trust
38.1%$10M
Service, Other
29.9%$8M
Trust Fees
22.3%$6M
Advisory Fees
9.8%$3M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

BHRB vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFISLAGGINGNBTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — BHRB and NBTB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 129.4x CZWI's $90M. BHRB is the more profitable business, keeping 24.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.

MetricBHRB logoBHRBBurke & Herbert F…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$487M$902M$90M$11.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$162M$241M$9M$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$117M$169M$14M$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$96M$225M$11M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.1%+73.6%+54.7%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+29.7%+24.3%+7.0%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+24.1%+18.8%+16.0%+22.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.7%+24.9%+12.4%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+53.8%+39.5%+63.0%+30.6%
Evenly matched — BHRB and NBTB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.7x trailing earnings, BHRB trades at a 83% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BHRB offers better value at 0.47x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBHRB logoBHRBBurke & Herbert F…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$1.0B$2.5B$207M$20.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$2.7B$140M$23.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.66x14.47x14.70x52.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.29x11.54x11.79x6.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.47x2.06x2.90x2.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.29x11.03x15.69x6.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.05x2.90x2.29x1.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.18x1.29x1.11x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.48x11.49x19.90x7.21x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BHRB's 0.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBHRB logoBHRBBurke & Herbert F…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.6%+9.5%+7.8%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.5%+1.1%+0.8%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.4%+7.9%+2.0%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.5%+2.4%+0.6%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96766
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.63x0.17x0.28x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$484M$142M-$67M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$53M$185M$119M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$537M$327M$52M$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.97x1.05x0.16x21.16x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBHRB logoBHRBBurke & Herbert F…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.4%+17.6%+24.3%-38.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+17.9%+18.3%+52.1%-49.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-8.8%+48.5%+153.7%-18.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+51.7%+44.4%+69.0%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+80.9%+108.5%+149.0%-25.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-3.0%+14.1%+36.4%-6.8%
CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NBTB and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BHRB's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBHRB logoBHRBBurke & Herbert F…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.81x0.76x0.50x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$70.90$48.27$22.62$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$55.40$39.20$12.83$37.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.6%+99.8%+94.9%+47.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.063.151.230.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded146K266K41K5.6M
Evenly matched — NBTB and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BHRB as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs CZWI's 1.73%.

MetricBHRB logoBHRBBurke & Herbert F…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$74.00$46.00$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts310237
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.4%+3.0%+1.7%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises21361
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.26$1.43$0.37$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.4%+3.0%+7.0%
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallFidelity National Informati… (FIS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BHRB vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BHRB or NBTB or CZWI or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.

(BHRB) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BHRB or NBTB or CZWI or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.

(BHRB) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BHRB or NBTB or CZWI or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +149. 0% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BHRB or NBTB or CZWI or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. 's 0. 81β — meaning BHRB is approximately 63% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 63% for Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BHRB or NBTB or CZWI or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.

(BHRB) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 231. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BHRB or NBTB or CZWI or FIS?

Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.

(BHRB) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 9% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BHRB leads at 29. 5% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BHRB or NBTB or CZWI or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BHRB or NBTB or CZWI or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).

09

Is BHRB or NBTB or CZWI or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, BHRB: +80. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BHRB and NBTB and CZWI and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (BHRB (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BHRB is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.