Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
BHRB logo
BHRB
NBTB logo
NBTB
FXNC logo
FXNC
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BHRB vs NBTB vs FXNC vs KO vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BHRB
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.01B
5Y Perf.+55.3%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
FXNC
First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$273M
5Y Perf.+117.5%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

BHRB vs NBTB vs FXNC vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BHRB logoBHRB
NBTB logoNBTB
FXNC logoFXNC
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$1.01B$2.52B$273M$355.61B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$487M$902M$115M$49.28B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$117M$169M$18M$13.70B$57.05B
Gross Margin69.1%73.6%74.7%61.7%60.0%
Operating Margin29.7%24.3%19.0%29.3%25.9%
Forward P/E8.3x11.5x12.8x25.3x14.4x
Total Debt$537M$327M$43M$45.49B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$53M$185M$161M$10.27B$343.34B

BHRB vs NBTB vs FXNC vs KO vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BHRB
NBTB
FXNC
KO
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Burke & Herbert Fin… (BHRB)100155.3+55.3%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
First National Corp… (FXNC)100217.5+117.5%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BHRB vs NBTB vs FXNC vs KO vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FXNC leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. KO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FXNC emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
BHRB
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.
The Banking Pick

BHRB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and defensive is your priority.

  • PEG 0.45 vs FXNC's 8.59
  • Beta 0.81, yield 3.4%, current ratio 3.79x
  • NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • Lower P/E (8.3x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.45 vs 2.26
Best for: valuation efficiency and defensive
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FXNC
First National Corporation
The Banking Pick

FXNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
  • 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
  • Beta 0.52 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
  • +57.8% vs KO's +17.2%
Best for: growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.

  • 27.8% margin vs FXNC's 15.4%
  • 13.1% ROA vs FXNC's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.7%
Best for: quality and efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs FXNC's 258.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFXNC logoFXNC27.1% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueBHRB logoBHRBLower P/E (8.3x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.45 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs FXNC's 15.4%
Stability / SafetyFXNC logoFXNCBeta 0.52 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsBHRB logoBHRB3.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)FXNC logoFXNC+57.8% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs FXNC's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.7%

BHRB vs NBTB vs FXNC vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BHRBBurke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.
FY 2025
Fiduciary and Trust
38.1%$10M
Service, Other
29.9%$8M
Trust Fees
22.3%$6M
Advisory Fees
9.8%$3M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
FXNCFirst National Corporation
FY 2018
Bank Servicing And Deposit Account
41.2%$3M
Credit And Debit Card
29.2%$2M
Financial Service, Wealth Management
21.8%$2M
Financial Service, Other
7.8%$601,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

BHRB vs NBTB vs FXNC vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBHRBLAGGINGNBTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FXNC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2431.1x FXNC's $115M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FXNC's 15.4%.

MetricBHRB logoBHRBBurke & Herbert F…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$487M$902M$115M$49.3B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$162M$241M$25M$15.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$117M$169M$18M$13.7B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$96M$225M$21M$12.6B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.1%+73.6%+74.7%+61.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+29.7%+24.3%+19.0%+29.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+24.1%+18.8%+15.4%+27.8%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.7%+24.9%+18.2%+25.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+53.8%+39.5%+7.1%+18.2%+16.0%
FXNC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BHRB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.7x trailing earnings, BHRB trades at a 68% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BHRB offers better value at 0.47x vs FXNC's 10.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBHRB logoBHRBBurke & Herbert F…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$1.0B$2.5B$273M$355.6B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$2.7B$155M$390.8B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.66x14.47x15.40x27.18x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.29x11.54x12.82x25.27x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.47x2.06x10.32x2.43x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.29x11.03x7.05x26.39x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.05x2.90x2.43x7.42x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.18x1.29x1.46x10.40x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.48x11.49x12.99x67.15x8.88x
BHRB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBHRB logoBHRBBurke & Herbert F…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.6%+9.5%+10.0%+41.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.5%+1.1%+0.9%+13.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.4%+7.9%+7.7%+15.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.5%+2.4%+9.9%+17.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967775
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.63x0.17x0.23x1.33x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$484M$142M-$118M$35.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$53M$185M$161M$10.3B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$537M$327M$43M$45.5B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.97x1.05x0.84x10.70x0.74x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,438 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +57.8% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs BHRB's -3.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBHRB logoBHRBBurke & Herbert F…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.4%+17.6%+24.4%+20.3%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+17.9%+18.3%+57.8%+17.2%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-8.8%+48.5%+103.7%+47.0%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+51.7%+44.4%+71.0%+65.6%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+80.9%+108.5%+258.5%+121.1%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-3.0%+14.1%+26.8%+13.7%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs BHRB's 94.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBHRB logoBHRBBurke & Herbert F…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.81x0.76x0.52x-0.20x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$70.90$48.27$30.51$84.04$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$55.40$39.20$18.31$65.35$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.6%+99.8%+99.0%+98.3%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.063.167.060.659.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded146K266K79K12.7M7.0M
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BHRB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BHRB as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", FXNC as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.3% upside for BHRB (target: $74) vs -30.4% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, BHRB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.36% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricBHRB logoBHRBBurke & Herbert F…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$74.00$46.00$21.00$86.13$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts31014861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.4%+3.0%+2.0%+2.5%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises213115615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.26$1.43$0.61$2.04$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.4%+0.1%+0.2%+3.9%
Evenly matched — BHRB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FXNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BHRB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallBurke & Herbert Financial S… (BHRB)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BHRB vs NBTB vs FXNC vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BHRB or NBTB or FXNC or KO or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BHRB or NBTB or FXNC or KO or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.

(BHRB) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. wins at 0. 45x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BHRB or NBTB or FXNC or KO or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +44. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus BHRB's +80. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BHRB or NBTB or FXNC or KO or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BHRB or NBTB or FXNC or KO or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.

1% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 231. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BHRB or NBTB or FXNC or KO or JPM?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 15. 8% for First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BHRB leads at 29. 5% versus 19. 6% for FXNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BHRB or NBTB or FXNC or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 45x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 17. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BHRB: 10. 3% to $74. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BHRB or NBTB or FXNC or KO or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

09

Is BHRB or NBTB or FXNC or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, BHRB: +80. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BHRB and NBTB and FXNC and KO and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (BHRB (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and FXNC (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BHRB is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.