Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BIPI vs ATNI vs BIP vs LUMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Diversified Utilities
Telecommunications Services
BIPI vs ATNI vs BIP vs LUMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Telecommunications Services | Diversified Utilities | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | — | $395M | $17.07B | $8.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $334.79B | $731M | $24.01B | $12.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104.03B | $-9M | $417M | $-1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 37.9% | 27.0% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 96.8% | 5.0% | 25.2% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 41.5x | 30.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.07T | $694M | $64.50B | $17.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23.68B | $117M | $3.20B | $1.00B |
BIPI vs ATNI vs BIP vs LUMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIP Bermuda Holding… (BIPI) | 100 | 67.5 | -32.5% |
| ATN International, … (ATNI) | 100 | 64.8 | -35.2% |
| Brookfield Infrastr… (BIP) | 100 | 93.9 | -6.1% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 68.4 | -31.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIPI vs ATNI vs BIP vs LUMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BIPI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 31.1% margin vs LUMN's -14.3%
- 5.3% ROA vs LUMN's -5.3%, ROIC 9.5% vs -0.8%
ATNI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.47 vs LUMN's 2.74
BIP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 10.3%
- Rev growth 9.8%, EPS growth 7.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.0%
- 195.1% 10Y total return vs BIPI's -13.4%
- Beta 0.63, yield 10.3%, current ratio 2.48x
LUMN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.0% vs BIPI's +7.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.8% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.1% margin vs LUMN's -14.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs LUMN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ATNI's 4.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.0% vs BIPI's +7.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs LUMN's -5.3%, ROIC 9.5% vs -0.8% |
BIPI vs ATNI vs BIP vs LUMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BIPI vs ATNI vs BIP vs LUMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BIPI leads in 2 of 6 categories
ATNI leads 1 • LUMN leads 1 • BIP leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIPI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIPI is the larger business by revenue, generating $334.8B annually — 458.1x ATNI's $731M. BIPI is the more profitable business, keeping 31.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUMN's -14.3%. On growth, BIPI holds the edge at +38.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $334.8B | $731M | $24.0B | $12.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $139M | $10.2B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$9M | $417M | -$1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $38M | -$13.7B | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +37.9% | +27.0% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +96.8% | +5.0% | +25.2% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | -1.3% | +1.7% | -14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +5.1% | -57.2% | +44.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.2% | +1.6% | +16.9% | -8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +58.0% | -6.2% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ATNI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ATNI's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LUMN's 9.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $395M | $17.1B | $8.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $972M | $78.4B | $25.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -26.23x | 37.69x | -4.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 41.47x | 30.91x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.12x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.35x | 7.98x | 9.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.54x | 0.74x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.61x | 0.48x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.00x | — | 23.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIPI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIPI delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN. BIPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIP's 1.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIPI scores 8/9 vs LUMN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | -1.5% | +1.2% | -79.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | -0.6% | +0.3% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.5% | +2.6% | +4.8% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.6% | +3.0% | +5.3% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 1.08x | 1.82x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.05T | $577M | $61.3B | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23.7B | $117M | $3.2B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.07T | $694M | $64.5B | $17.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.91x | 1.81x | -1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LUMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BIP five years ago would be worth $12,535 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,348 for ATNI. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +100.0% total return vs BIPI's +7.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.4% vs ATNI's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.1% | +16.9% | +9.0% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.9% | +65.0% | +22.3% | +100.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.7% | -21.0% | +17.8% | +267.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.4% | -36.5% | +25.3% | -28.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.4% | -53.5% | +195.1% | -35.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.9% | -7.6% | +5.6% | +54.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATNI and BIP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATNI is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIP currently trades 91.6% from its 52-week high vs LUMN's 70.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.47x | 0.63x | 2.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.18 | $30.45 | $40.32 | $11.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.44 | $13.76 | $29.63 | $3.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +84.4% | +91.6% | +70.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 48.5 | 56.9 | 73.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 80K | 1.0M | 12.5M |
Analyst Outlook
BIP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATNI as "Buy", BIP as "Buy", LUMN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.1% upside for BIP (target: $46) vs -16.3% for LUMN (target: $7). For income investors, BIP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.26% vs ATNI's 4.00%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.00 | $46.20 | $7.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 16 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.0% | +10.3% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 15 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.03 | $3.79 | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +0.2% | +1.1% | 0.0% |
BIPI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATNI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BIPI vs ATNI vs BIP vs LUMN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIPI or ATNI or BIP or LUMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) is the stronger pick with 9. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) offers the better valuation at 37. 7x trailing P/E (30. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ATN International, Inc. (ATNI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BIPI or ATNI or BIP or LUMN?
On forward P/E, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. is actually cheaper at 30. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BIPI or ATNI or BIP or LUMN?
Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) delivered a total return of +25. 3%, compared to -36. 5% for ATN International, Inc. (ATNI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BIP returned +195. 1% versus ATNI's -53. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BIPI or ATNI or BIP or LUMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ATN International, Inc.
(ATNI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately 489% more volatile than ATNI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BIP Bermuda Holdings I Limited (BIPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 182% for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BIPI or ATNI or BIP or LUMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) is pulling ahead at 9. 8% versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. grew EPS 716. 7% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIP leads at 17. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BIPI or ATNI or BIP or LUMN?
BIP Bermuda Holdings I Limited (BIPI) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
1% net margin versus -14. 0% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIPI leads at 96. 8% versus -1. 5% for LUMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIPI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BIPI or ATNI or BIP or LUMN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) trades at 30. 9x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for ATN International, Inc. — 10. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BIP: 25. 1% to $46. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — BIPI or ATNI or BIP or LUMN?
In this comparison, BIP (10.
3% yield), ATNI (4. 0% yield) pay a dividend. BIPI, LUMN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BIPI or ATNI or BIP or LUMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 10. 3% yield, +195. 1% 10Y return). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BIP: +195. 1%, LUMN: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BIPI and ATNI and BIP and LUMN?
These companies operate in different sectors (BIPI (Industrials) and ATNI (Communication Services) and BIP (Utilities) and LUMN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BIPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATNI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BIP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ATNI, BIP pay a dividend while BIPI, LUMN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 1.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.