Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BJRI vs BLMN vs DRI vs TXRH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
BJRI vs BLMN vs DRI vs TXRH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $859M | $678M | $23.11B | $10.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.41B | $3.97B | $12.76B | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $44M | $22M | $1.11B | $415M |
| Gross Margin | 74.7% | 70.2% | 44.0% | 18.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 1.1% | 11.6% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 17.5x | 9.5x | 18.4x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $491M | $3.07B | $6.23B | $1.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $59M | $240M | $135M |
BJRI vs BLMN vs DRI vs TXRH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BJ's Restaurants, I… (BJRI) | 100 | 188.2 | +88.2% |
| Bloomin' Brands, In… (BLMN) | 100 | 69.7 | -30.3% |
| Darden Restaurants,… (DRI) | 100 | 253.9 | +153.9% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 304.6 | +204.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BJRI vs BLMN vs DRI vs TXRH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BJRI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BLMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 25.0x)
- 5.6% yield, vs TXRH's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +13.6% vs TXRH's -6.2%
DRI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.55, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.42x
- 8.7% margin vs BLMN's 0.5%
- Beta 0.55 vs BLMN's 1.82, lower leverage
TXRH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth -5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- 288.0% 10Y total return vs DRI's 261.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, current ratio 0.50x
- 9.4% revenue growth vs BLMN's 0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs BLMN's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.7% margin vs BLMN's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs BLMN's 1.82, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.6% yield, vs TXRH's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.6% vs TXRH's -6.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs BLMN's 0.7%, ROIC 14.5% vs 4.3% |
BJRI vs BLMN vs DRI vs TXRH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BJRI vs BLMN vs DRI vs TXRH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DRI leads in 1 of 6 categories
BLMN leads 1 • TXRH leads 1 • BJRI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DRI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.8B annually — 9.1x BJRI's $1.4B. DRI is the more profitable business, keeping 8.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLMN's 0.5%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $4.0B | $12.8B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $123M | $225M | $2.0B | $709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $44M | $22M | $1.1B | $415M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $80M | $119M | $1.6B | $441M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.7% | +70.2% | +44.0% | +18.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +1.1% | +11.6% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +0.5% | +8.7% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +3.0% | +12.3% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +1.0% | +5.9% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.3% | +30.0% | -3.3% | +10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BLMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.9x trailing earnings, BJRI trades at a 85% valuation discount to BLMN's 126.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BJRI's 10.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TXRH's 17.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $859M | $678M | $23.1B | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $3.7B | $29.1B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.93x | 125.99x | 22.03x | 25.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.51x | 9.53x | 18.37x | 25.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.79x | 10.83x | 15.49x | 17.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.61x | 0.17x | 1.91x | 1.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.53x | 2.01x | 10.00x | 7.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.01x | 7.00x | 22.32x | 30.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BJRI and TXRH each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DRI delivers a 50.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $6 for BLMN. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLMN's 9.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BJRI scores 7/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +5.9% | +50.7% | +37.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | +0.7% | +8.6% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | +4.3% | +13.0% | +14.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +6.9% | +14.0% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.34x | 9.10x | 2.70x | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $467M | $3.0B | $6.0B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $59M | $240M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $491M | $3.1B | $6.2B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.28x | 1.06x | 7.57x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $16,160 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,597 for BLMN. Over the past 12 months, BLMN leads with a +13.6% total return vs TXRH's -6.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 15.4% vs BLMN's -24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | +24.6% | +5.8% | -7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.0% | +13.6% | +1.6% | -6.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.4% | -56.9% | +41.1% | +53.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.2% | -64.0% | +55.4% | +61.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.3% | -36.8% | +261.8% | +288.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.9% | -24.5% | +12.2% | +15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BJRI and DRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLMN's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BJRI currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs BLMN's 74.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.82x | 0.55x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.02 | $10.70 | $228.27 | $199.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.46 | $5.19 | $169.00 | $153.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.9% | +74.3% | +85.5% | +79.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.1 | 73.3 | 47.2 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 366K | 2.8M | 1.3M | 983K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BLMN and TXRH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BJRI as "Buy", BLMN as "Hold", DRI as "Buy", TXRH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for TXRH (target: $192) vs -0.9% for BJRI (target: $41). For income investors, BLMN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.65% vs TXRH's 1.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.50 | $8.50 | $225.36 | $191.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 28 | 59 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.6% | +2.8% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.45 | $5.56 | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.9% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +1.4% |
DRI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BLMN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
BJRI vs BLMN vs DRI vs TXRH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BJRI or BLMN or DRI or TXRH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN). BJ's Restaurants, Inc. (BJRI) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BJ's Restaurants, Inc. (BJRI) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BJRI or BLMN or DRI or TXRH?
On trailing P/E, BJ's Restaurants, Inc.
(BJRI) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus Bloomin' Brands, Inc. at 126. 0x. On forward P/E, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BJRI or BLMN or DRI or TXRH?
Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) delivered a total return of +61. 6%, compared to -64. 0% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus BLMN's -36. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BJRI or BLMN or DRI or TXRH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Darden Restaurants, Inc.
(DRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Bloomin' Brands, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning BLMN is approximately 232% more volatile than DRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 9% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BJRI or BLMN or DRI or TXRH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus 0. 1% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BJ's Restaurants, Inc. grew EPS 208. 6% year-over-year, compared to -5. 7% for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXRH leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BJRI or BLMN or DRI or TXRH?
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
(DRI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus 0. 1% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DRI leads at 11. 3% versus 3. 3% for BJRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BJRI leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BJRI or BLMN or DRI or TXRH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
(BLMN) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TXRH: 21. 3% to $191. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — BJRI or BLMN or DRI or TXRH?
In this comparison, BLMN (5.
6% yield), DRI (2. 8% yield), TXRH (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. BJRI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BJRI or BLMN or DRI or TXRH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Darden Restaurants, Inc.
(DRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 2. 8% yield, +261. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DRI: +261. 8%, BJRI: -6. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BJRI and BLMN and DRI and TXRH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BJRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLMN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DRI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BLMN, DRI, TXRH pay a dividend while BJRI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.