BKR
Baker Hughes Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$66.10B
5Y Perf.+303.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BKR vs FTI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$29.58B
5Y Perf.+1120.1%
BKR vs FTI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BKR | FTI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $66.10B | $29.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27.89B | $10.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.12B | $1.08B |
| Gross Margin | 23.6% | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | 27.8x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $7.14B | $2.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.71B | $1.03B |
BKR vs FTI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BKR
FTI
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 403.7 | +303.7% |
| TechnipFMC plc (FTI) | 100 | 1220.1 | +1120.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BKR vs FTI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FTI leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Baker Hughes Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
The Income Pick
BKR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 37.6%, current ratio 1.36x
- Beta 0.83, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.36x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
The Growth Play
FTI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 221.8% 10Y total return vs BKR's 186.3%
- 9.4% revenue growth vs BKR's -0.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FTI | 9.4% revenue growth vs BKR's -0.3% |
| Value | FTI | Lower P/E (25.3x vs 27.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | BKR | 11.2% margin vs FTI's 10.6% |
| Stability / Safety | FTI | Beta 0.59 vs BKR's 0.83 |
| Dividends | BKR | 1.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FTI's 0.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | FTI | +154.3% vs BKR's +86.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FTI | 10.7% ROA vs BKR's 7.3%, ROIC 17.6% vs 12.7% |
BKR vs FTI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
BKR vs FTI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBKRLAGGINGFTI
FTITechnipFMC plc
3leads
BKRBaker Hughes Company
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FTIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BKR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BKR4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FTI8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FTI6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FTI2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
BKR2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.9B annually — 2.7x FTI's $10.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.2% (BKR) to 10.6% (FTI). On growth, FTI holds the edge at +11.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | FTITechnipFMC plc |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27.9B | $10.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.5B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.1B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +20.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +10.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +11.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +132.5% | +93.9% |
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.6x trailing earnings, BKR trades at a 20% valuation discount to FTI's 32.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BKR's 14.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FTI's 21.9x.
| Metric | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | FTITechnipFMC plc |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $66.1B | $29.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $69.5B | $30.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.64x | 32.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.79x | 25.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.65x | 21.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.38x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.49x | 9.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.06x | 20.44x |
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTI delivers a 32.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $16 for BKR. BKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTI's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTI scores 7/9 vs BKR's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | FTITechnipFMC plc |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.1% | +32.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +10.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.7% | +17.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.6% | +18.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $984M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.7B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.1B | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.68x | 22.62x |
FTI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTI five years ago would be worth $91,063 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $30,743 for BKR. Over the past 12 months, FTI leads with a +154.3% total return vs BKR's +86.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTI at 74.7% vs BKR's 35.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | FTITechnipFMC plc |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.4% | +56.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.3% | +154.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.1% | +432.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.4% | +810.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +186.3% | +221.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.2% | +74.7% |
FTI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTI is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BKR's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | FTITechnipFMC plc |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.41 | $77.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.83 | $28.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.7 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.0M | 3.8M |
FTI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
BKR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BKR as "Buy" and FTI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for BKR (target: $72) vs -8.9% for FTI (target: $67). For income investors, BKR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.37% vs FTI's 0.27%.
| Metric | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | FTITechnipFMC plc |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $72.00 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 45 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.92 | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +3.1% |
BKR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
BKR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FTI leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
Best OverallBaker Hughes Company (BKR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BKR vs FTI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BKR or FTI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the stronger pick with 9.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Baker Hughes Company (BKR). Baker Hughes Company (BKR) offers the better valuation at 25. 6x trailing P/E (27. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Baker Hughes Company (BKR) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BKR or FTI?
On trailing P/E, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the cheapest at 25.
6x versus TechnipFMC plc at 32. 1x. On forward P/E, TechnipFMC plc is actually cheaper at 25. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BKR or FTI?
Over the past 5 years, TechnipFMC plc (FTI) delivered a total return of +810.
6%, compared to +207. 4% for Baker Hughes Company (BKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTI returned +221. 8% versus BKR's +186. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BKR or FTI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
59β versus Baker Hughes Company's 0. 83β — meaning BKR is approximately 41% more volatile than FTI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 59% for TechnipFMC plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BKR or FTI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is pulling ahead at 9.
4% versus -0. 3% for Baker Hughes Company (BKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TechnipFMC plc grew EPS 20. 4% year-over-year, compared to -12. 8% for Baker Hughes Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTI leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BKR or FTI?
TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
7% net margin versus 9. 3% for Baker Hughes Company — meaning it keeps 9. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKR leads at 12. 8% versus 9. 6% for FTI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKR leads at 23. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BKR or FTI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TechnipFMC plc (FTI) trades at 25.
3x forward P/E versus 27. 8x for Baker Hughes Company — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKR: 8. 0% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BKR or FTI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Baker Hughes Company (BKR) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 3% for TechnipFMC plc (FTI).
09Is BKR or FTI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 4% yield, +186. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKR: +186. 3%, FTI: +221. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BKR and FTI?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BKR pays a dividend while FTI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BKR: 2.5% · FTI: 11.2%)Net Margin>
%
(BKR: 11.2% · FTI: 10.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(BKR: 25.6x · FTI: 32.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.