BKR
Baker Hughes Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$66.10B
5Y Perf.+303.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BKR vs HAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HAL
Halliburton Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$33.74B
5Y Perf.+243.8%
BKR vs HAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BKR | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $66.10B | $33.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27.89B | $22.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.12B | $1.54B |
| Gross Margin | 23.6% | 15.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | 27.8x | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $7.14B | $8.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.71B | $2.21B |
BKR vs HAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BKR
HAL
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 403.7 | +303.7% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 343.8 | +243.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BKR vs HAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HAL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Baker Hughes Company is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
The Growth Play
BKR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth -12.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
- 186.3% 10Y total return vs HAL's 17.2%
- -0.3% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
HAL
Halliburton Company
The Income Pick
HAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.57, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.04x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BKR | -0.3% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3% |
| Value | HAL | Lower P/E (17.4x vs 27.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | BKR | 11.2% margin vs HAL's 6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | HAL | Beta 0.57 vs BKR's 0.83 |
| Dividends | HAL | 1.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BKR's 1.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | HAL | +111.3% vs BKR's +86.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BKR | 7.3% ROA vs HAL's 6.1%, ROIC 12.7% vs 10.2% |
BKR vs HAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
BKR vs HAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBKRLAGGINGHAL
HALHalliburton Company
3leads
BKRBaker Hughes Company
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HALMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BKR6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
HAL5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
BKR9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BKR5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
HAL2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
HAL1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR and HAL operate at a comparable scale, with $27.9B and $22.2B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.2% (BKR) to 6.9% (HAL).
| Metric | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | HALHalliburton Compa… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27.9B | $22.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.5B | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.1B | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +15.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +132.5% | +129.2% |
BKR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
HAL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.6x trailing earnings, BKR trades at a 5% valuation discount to HAL's 26.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HAL's 11.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKR's 14.7x.
| Metric | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | HALHalliburton Compa… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $66.1B | $33.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $69.5B | $39.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.64x | 26.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.79x | 17.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.65x | 11.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.38x | 1.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.49x | 3.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.06x | 20.18x |
HAL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $15 for HAL. BKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAL's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKR scores 6/9 vs HAL's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | HALHalliburton Compa… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.1% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.7% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.6% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.7B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.1B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.68x | 9.19x |
BKR leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKR five years ago would be worth $30,743 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,477 for HAL. Over the past 12 months, HAL leads with a +111.3% total return vs BKR's +86.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKR at 35.2% vs HAL's 12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | HALHalliburton Compa… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.4% | +37.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.3% | +111.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.1% | +41.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.4% | +94.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +186.3% | +17.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.2% | +12.3% |
BKR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BKR's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | HALHalliburton Compa… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.41 | $42.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.83 | $19.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.7 | 64.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.0M | 15.0M |
HAL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
HAL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BKR as "Buy" and HAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for BKR (target: $72) vs -8.2% for HAL (target: $37). For income investors, HAL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.71% vs BKR's 1.37%.
| Metric | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | HALHalliburton Compa… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $72.00 | $37.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 45 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.92 | $0.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +3.0% |
HAL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
BKR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HAL leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallBaker Hughes Company (BKR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BKR vs HAL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BKR or HAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the stronger pick with -0.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). Baker Hughes Company (BKR) offers the better valuation at 25. 6x trailing P/E (27. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Baker Hughes Company (BKR) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BKR or HAL?
On trailing P/E, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the cheapest at 25.
6x versus Halliburton Company at 26. 9x. On forward P/E, Halliburton Company is actually cheaper at 17. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BKR or HAL?
Over the past 5 years, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) delivered a total return of +207.
4%, compared to +94. 8% for Halliburton Company (HAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKR returned +186. 3% versus HAL's +17. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BKR or HAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halliburton Company (HAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
57β versus Baker Hughes Company's 0. 83β — meaning BKR is approximately 46% more volatile than HAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 77% for Halliburton Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BKR or HAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is pulling ahead at -0.
3% versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Baker Hughes Company grew EPS -12. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Halliburton Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKR leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BKR or HAL?
Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
3% net margin versus 5. 8% for Halliburton Company — meaning it keeps 9. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKR leads at 12. 8% versus 10. 2% for HAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKR leads at 23. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BKR or HAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halliburton Company (HAL) trades at 17.
4x forward P/E versus 27. 8x for Baker Hughes Company — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKR: 8. 0% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BKR or HAL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Halliburton Company (HAL) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 1. 4% for Baker Hughes Company (BKR).
09Is BKR or HAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
57), 1. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAL: +17. 2%, BKR: +186. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BKR and HAL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BKR: 2.5% · HAL: -0.3%)Net Margin>
%
(BKR: 11.2% · HAL: 6.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(BKR: 25.6x · HAL: 26.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.