Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC vs HOLX vs SYK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BLCO
Bausch + Lomb Corporation

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNYSE • CA
Market Cap$5.77B
5Y Perf.-4.9%
HSIC
Henry Schein, Inc.

Medical - Distribution

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.13B
5Y Perf.-17.3%
ATRC
AtriCure, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.33B
5Y Perf.-35.3%
HOLX
Hologic, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$16.97B
5Y Perf.+0.4%
SYK
Stryker Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$109.33B
5Y Perf.+21.7%

BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC vs HOLX vs SYK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BLCO logoBLCO
HSIC logoHSIC
ATRC logoATRC
HOLX logoHOLX
SYK logoSYK
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - DistributionMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Devices
Market Cap$5.77B$8.13B$1.33B$16.97B$109.33B
Revenue (TTM)$5.21B$13.18B$552M$4.13B$25.12B
Net Income (TTM)$-219M$398M$-5M$544M$3.25B
Gross Margin55.9%29.1%75.5%52.8%63.5%
Operating Margin5.9%5.8%-0.4%17.5%22.4%
Forward P/E20.4x13.2x428.7x17.2x19.1x
Total Debt$5.37B$3.69B$88M$2.63B$14.86B
Cash & Equiv.$383M$156M$167M$1.96B$4.01B

BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC vs HOLX vs SYKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BLCO
HSIC
ATRC
HOLX
SYK
StockMay 22May 26Return
Bausch + Lomb Corpo… (BLCO)10095.1-4.9%
Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC)10082.7-17.3%
AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC)10064.7-35.3%
Hologic, Inc. (HOLX)100100.4+0.4%
Stryker Corporation (SYK)100121.7+21.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC vs HOLX vs SYK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HOLX and SYK are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Stryker Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and operational efficiency and capital deployment. BLCO, HSIC, and ATRC also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BLCO
Bausch + Lomb Corporation
The Momentum Pick

BLCO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +40.7% vs SYK's -24.5%
Best for: momentum
HSIC
Henry Schein, Inc.
The Value Play

HSIC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (13.2x vs 17.2x)
Best for: value
ATRC
AtriCure, Inc.
The Growth Play

ATRC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 74.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
  • 14.9% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7%
Best for: growth exposure
HOLX
Hologic, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

HOLX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 52.0%, current ratio 3.75x
  • Beta 0.45, current ratio 3.75x
  • 13.2% margin vs BLCO's -4.2%
  • Beta 0.45 vs BLCO's 1.36, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
SYK
Stryker Corporation
The Income Pick

SYK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 1.2%
  • 179.2% 10Y total return vs HOLX's 124.3%
  • PEG 1.28 vs HSIC's 4.20
  • 1.2% yield; 34-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthATRC logoATRC14.9% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7%
ValueHSIC logoHSICLower P/E (13.2x vs 17.2x)
Quality / MarginsHOLX logoHOLX13.2% margin vs BLCO's -4.2%
Stability / SafetyHOLX logoHOLXBeta 0.45 vs BLCO's 1.36, lower leverage
DividendsSYK logoSYK1.2% yield; 34-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BLCO logoBLCO+40.7% vs SYK's -24.5%
Efficiency (ROA)SYK logoSYK6.9% ROA vs BLCO's -1.6%, ROIC 11.4% vs 1.2%

BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC vs HOLX vs SYK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BLCOBausch + Lomb Corporation
FY 2025
Device Products
37.7%$1.9B
Over the Counter Products
36.0%$1.8B
Pharmaceutical Products
21.2%$1.1B
Branded and Other Generic Products
4.8%$243M
Other Revenues
0.4%$21M
HSICHenry Schein, Inc.
FY 2018
Healthcare Distribution
96.1%$12.7B
Technology
3.9%$509M
ATRCAtriCure, Inc.
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$2M
HOLXHologic, Inc.
FY 2025
Diagnostics
44.6%$1.8B
Breast Health
36.2%$1.5B
Gyn Surgical
16.6%$680M
Skeletal Health
2.7%$109M
SYKStryker Corporation
FY 2025
MedSurg
62.3%$15.6B
Orthopaedics
37.7%$9.5B

BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC vs HOLX vs SYK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSYKLAGGINGBLCO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ATRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

SYK is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.1B annually — 45.5x ATRC's $552M. HOLX is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLCO's -4.2%. On growth, ATRC holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBLCO logoBLCOBausch + Lomb Cor…HSIC logoHSICHenry Schein, Inc.ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.2B$13.2B$552M$4.1B$25.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$724M$1.1B$13M$974M$6.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$219M$398M-$5M$544M$3.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4M$561M$54M$1000M$4.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.9%+29.1%+75.5%+52.8%+63.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.9%+5.8%-0.4%+17.5%+22.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.2%+3.0%-0.8%+13.2%+12.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.1%+4.3%+9.7%+24.2%+17.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.4%+7.7%+14.3%+2.5%+11.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+66.7%+14.9%+101.6%-9.2%+56.0%
ATRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HSIC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 21.7x trailing earnings, HSIC trades at a 36% valuation discount to SYK's 34.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYK offers better value at 2.29x vs HSIC's 6.87x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBLCO logoBLCOBausch + Lomb Cor…HSIC logoHSICHenry Schein, Inc.ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
Market CapShares × price$5.8B$8.1B$1.3B$17.0B$109.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$10.8B$11.7B$1.3B$17.6B$120.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-15.86x21.66x-109.50x30.53x33.98x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.35x13.25x428.71x17.21x19.06x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate6.87x2.29x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.66x10.90x73.24x17.39x19.76x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.13x0.62x2.49x4.14x4.35x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.88x1.80x2.55x3.43x4.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.18x27.56x18.44x25.53x
HSIC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

SYK delivers a 15.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-3 for BLCO. ATRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLCO's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOLX scores 7/9 vs BLCO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBLCO logoBLCOBausch + Lomb Cor…HSIC logoHSICHenry Schein, Inc.ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.4%+8.2%-1.0%+11.0%+15.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.6%+3.6%-0.7%+6.1%+6.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.2%+7.1%-0.6%+9.4%+11.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.6%+9.8%-0.6%+8.8%+13.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934576
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.82x0.77x0.18x0.52x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.0B$3.5B-$79M$667M$10.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$383M$156M$167M$2.0B$4.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.4B$3.7B$88M$2.6B$14.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.71x4.59x0.47x8.00x6.72x
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SYK five years ago would be worth $11,752 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,577 for ATRC. Over the past 12 months, BLCO leads with a +40.7% total return vs SYK's -24.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYK at 0.8% vs ATRC's -18.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBLCO logoBLCOBausch + Lomb Cor…HSIC logoHSICHenry Schein, Inc.ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-2.4%-7.8%-33.1%+1.9%-17.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+40.7%+2.8%-15.7%+35.3%-24.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-11.5%-11.3%-45.0%-8.5%+2.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.1%-14.6%-64.2%+16.8%+17.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.1%+5.8%+84.4%+124.3%+179.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-4.0%-3.9%-18.1%-2.9%+0.8%
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLCO's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ATRC's 60.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBLCO logoBLCOBausch + Lomb Cor…HSIC logoHSICHenry Schein, Inc.ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.36x0.72x0.95x0.45x0.52x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.92$89.29$43.18$76.04$404.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.99$61.95$26.10$53.62$284.97
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.5%+79.3%+60.9%+100.0%+70.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.434.344.069.126.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded415K1.2M678K10.3M2.1M
HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SYK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: BLCO as "Hold", HSIC as "Hold", ATRC as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold", SYK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.3% upside for ATRC (target: $51) vs 3.9% for HOLX (target: $79). SYK is the only dividend payer here at 1.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBLCO logoBLCOBausch + Lomb Cor…HSIC logoHSICHenry Schein, Inc.ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$19.00$85.43$51.33$79.00$389.62
# AnalystsCovering analysts1632194250
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises134
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.36
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+10.5%+0.8%+4.4%0.0%
SYK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SYK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ATRC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).

Best OverallStryker Corporation (SYK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC vs HOLX vs SYK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BLCO or HSIC or ATRC or HOLX or SYK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AtriCure, Inc.

(ATRC) is the stronger pick with 14. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BLCO or HSIC or ATRC or HOLX or SYK?

On trailing P/E, Henry Schein, Inc.

(HSIC) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus Stryker Corporation at 34. 0x. On forward P/E, Henry Schein, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stryker Corporation wins at 1. 28x versus Henry Schein, Inc. 's 4. 20x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BLCO or HSIC or ATRC or HOLX or SYK?

Over the past 5 years, Stryker Corporation (SYK) delivered a total return of +17.

5%, compared to -64. 2% for AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SYK returned +179. 2% versus BLCO's -19. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BLCO or HSIC or ATRC or HOLX or SYK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.

(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Bausch + Lomb Corporation's 1. 36β — meaning BLCO is approximately 201% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 82% for Bausch + Lomb Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BLCO or HSIC or ATRC or HOLX or SYK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AtriCure, Inc.

(ATRC) is pulling ahead at 14. 9% versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AtriCure, Inc. grew EPS 74. 7% year-over-year, compared to -25. 0% for Hologic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATRC leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BLCO or HSIC or ATRC or HOLX or SYK?

Hologic, Inc.

(HOLX) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 8% net margin versus -7. 1% for Bausch + Lomb Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYK leads at 19. 5% versus -0. 6% for ATRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATRC leads at 74. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BLCO or HSIC or ATRC or HOLX or SYK more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 28x versus Henry Schein, Inc. 's 4. 20x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 428. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 415. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATRC: 95. 3% to $51. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BLCO or HSIC or ATRC or HOLX or SYK?

In this comparison, SYK (1.

2% yield) pays a dividend. BLCO, HSIC, ATRC, HOLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BLCO or HSIC or ATRC or HOLX or SYK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

52), 1. 2% yield, +179. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +179. 2%, BLCO: -19. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BLCO and HSIC and ATRC and HOLX and SYK?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

SYK pays a dividend while BLCO, HSIC, ATRC, HOLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BLCO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HSIC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATRC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HOLX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SYK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BLCO and HSIC and ATRC and HOLX and SYK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BLCO: 9.4% · HSIC: 7.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.