Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BLDP vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE vs LIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Chemicals - Specialty
BLDP vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE vs LIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $1.41B | $646M | $4.36B | $62.18B | $228.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $99M | $170M | $710M | $2.45B | $34.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-91M | $-183M | $-1.63B | $6M | $7.13B |
| Gross Margin | 5.5% | -15.9% | 99.8% | 31.1% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | -104.7% | -67.6% | 38.1% | 8.2% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 123.6x | 27.7x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $144M | $997M | $2.99B | $26.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $526M | $295M | $1M | $2.45B | $5.06B |
BLDP vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE vs LIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ballard Power Syste… (BLDP) | 100 | 43.6 | -56.4% |
| FuelCell Energy, In… (FCEL) | 100 | 19.2 | -80.8% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 3220.9 | +3120.9% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLDP vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE vs LIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLDP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 45.0%, EPS growth 72.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.27, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 9.86x
- 45.0% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
FCEL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, PLUG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs LIN's 375.2%
- +14.6% vs LIN's +11.2%
LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
- Beta 0.24, yield 1.2%, current ratio 0.88x
- Lower P/E (27.7x vs 123.6x)
- 20.6% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.0% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.7x vs 123.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FCEL's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs LIN's +11.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 11.3% vs 10.9% |
BLDP vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BLDP vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE vs LIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LIN leads in 3 of 6 categories
BE leads 1 • BLDP leads 0 • FCEL leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PLUG and BE and LIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 348.7x BLDP's $99M. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $99M | $170M | $710M | $2.4B | $34.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$100M | -$84M | -$1.5B | $240M | $12.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$91M | -$183M | -$1.6B | $6M | $7.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$66M | -$126M | -$2M | $233M | $5.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | -15.9% | +99.8% | +31.1% | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -104.7% | -67.6% | +38.1% | +8.2% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -91.5% | -108.0% | -2.3% | +0.2% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -66.6% | -74.2% | -0.3% | +9.5% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.2% | +60.7% | +17.6% | +130.4% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.3% | +65.5% | +95.9% | +3.3% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
LIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LIN's 19.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 508.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $646M | $4.4B | $62.2B | $228.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $910M | $495M | $5.4B | $62.7B | $250.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.67x | -1.66x | — | -699.03x | 33.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 123.56x | 27.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 508.37x | 19.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.98x | 4.08x | 6.14x | 30.72x | 6.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.42x | 0.43x | — | 78.41x | 5.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 1087.24x | 44.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. BLDP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.6% | -26.8% | -124.4% | +0.8% | +17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.6% | -20.1% | -64.3% | +0.2% | +8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -68.8% | -14.0% | +10.9% | +4.1% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.3% | -13.8% | +18.6% | +2.5% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.20x | 19.75x | 3.77x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$504M | -$151M | $996M | $538M | $21.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $526M | $295M | $1M | $2.5B | $5.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $144M | $997M | $3.0B | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -46.37x | -30.14x | -36.18x | 1.05x | 34.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $500 for FCEL. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs LIN's +11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs FCEL's -44.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +75.4% | +50.3% | +40.4% | +162.1% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +291.7% | +219.0% | +303.6% | +1464.7% | +11.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.4% | -82.9% | -66.3% | +1425.9% | +39.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.5% | -95.0% | -86.4% | +1013.4% | +73.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +231.0% | -99.4% | +62.2% | +934.6% | +375.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.8% | -44.5% | -30.4% | +148.0% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BLDP and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLDP currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs PLUG's 68.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.27x | 2.91x | 2.57x | 3.61x | 0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.86 | $14.30 | $4.58 | $302.99 | $521.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.18 | $3.66 | $0.69 | $16.18 | $387.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.7% | +85.9% | +68.3% | +85.4% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.1 | 64.9 | 63.3 | 72.6 | 51.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 3.8M | 76.5M | 10.1M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLDP as "Hold", FCEL as "Hold", PLUG as "Buy", BE as "Buy", LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.9% upside for PLUG (target: $4) vs -42.1% for BLDP (target: $3). For income investors, LIN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.21% vs FCEL's 1.01%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.72 | $8.73 | $3.91 | $187.56 | $539.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 19 | 38 | 31 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | — | +0.0% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | 0 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 | — | $0.00 | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% |
LIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BLDP vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE vs LIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLDP or FCEL or PLUG or BE or LIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ballard Power Systems Inc.
(BLDP) is the stronger pick with 45. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 33. 8x trailing P/E (27. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLDP or FCEL or PLUG or BE or LIN?
On forward P/E, Linde plc is actually cheaper at 27.
7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLDP or FCEL or PLUG or BE or LIN?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -95.
0% for FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +934. 6% versus FCEL's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLDP or FCEL or PLUG or BE or LIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 1401% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ballard Power Systems Inc. (BLDP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLDP or FCEL or PLUG or BE or LIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ballard Power Systems Inc.
(BLDP) is pulling ahead at 45. 0% versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1414. 3% for FuelCell Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLDP or FCEL or PLUG or BE or LIN?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -80. 6% for BLDP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLDP or FCEL or PLUG or BE or LIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Linde plc (LIN) trades at 27.
7x forward P/E versus 123. 6x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 95. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLUG: 24. 9% to $3. 91.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLDP or FCEL or PLUG or BE or LIN?
In this comparison, LIN (1.
2% yield), FCEL (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. BLDP, PLUG, BE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLDP or FCEL or PLUG or BE or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +375. 2% 10Y return). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +375. 2%, PLUG: +62. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLDP and FCEL and PLUG and BE and LIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLDP (Industrials) and FCEL (Industrials) and PLUG (Industrials) and BE (Industrials) and LIN (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BLDP is a small-cap high-growth stock; FCEL is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. FCEL, LIN pay a dividend while BLDP, PLUG, BE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.