Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BLDP vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs LIN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BLDP
Ballard Power Systems Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$1.41B
5Y Perf.-56.4%
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.36B
5Y Perf.-25.7%
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$62.18B
5Y Perf.+3120.9%
FCEL
FuelCell Energy, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$646M
5Y Perf.-80.8%
LIN
Linde plc

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$228.85B
5Y Perf.+144.1%

BLDP vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs LIN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BLDP logoBLDP
PLUG logoPLUG
BE logoBE
FCEL logoFCEL
LIN logoLIN
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryElectrical Equipment & PartsElectrical Equipment & PartsElectrical Equipment & PartsChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$1.41B$4.36B$62.18B$646M$228.85B
Revenue (TTM)$99M$710M$2.45B$170M$34.66B
Net Income (TTM)$-91M$-1.63B$6M$-183M$7.13B
Gross Margin5.5%99.8%31.1%-15.9%46.0%
Operating Margin-104.7%38.1%8.2%-67.6%28.8%
Forward P/E123.6x27.7x
Total Debt$22M$997M$2.99B$144M$26.99B
Cash & Equiv.$526M$1M$2.45B$295M$5.06B

BLDP vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs LINLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BLDP
PLUG
BE
FCEL
LIN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Ballard Power Syste… (BLDP)10043.6-56.4%
Plug Power Inc. (PLUG)10074.3-25.7%
Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE)1003220.9+3120.9%
FuelCell Energy, In… (FCEL)10019.2-80.8%
Linde plc (LIN)100244.1+144.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BLDP vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs LIN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LIN leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Ballard Power Systems Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. BE also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BLDP
Ballard Power Systems Inc.
The Growth Play

BLDP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 45.0%, EPS growth 72.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.27, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 9.86x
  • 45.0% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.
The Industrials Pick

PLUG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

BE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 9.3% 10Y total return vs LIN's 375.2%
  • +14.6% vs LIN's +11.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
FCEL
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, FCEL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
LIN
Linde plc
The Income Pick

LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
  • Beta 0.24, yield 1.2%, current ratio 0.88x
  • Better valuation composite
  • 20.6% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBLDP logoBLDP45.0% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
ValueLIN logoLINBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLIN logoLIN20.6% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
Stability / SafetyLIN logoLINBeta 0.24 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage
DividendsLIN logoLIN1.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FCEL's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BE logoBE+14.6% vs LIN's +11.2%
Efficiency (ROA)LIN logoLIN8.3% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 11.3% vs 10.9%

BLDP vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BLDPBallard Power Systems Inc.
FY 2022
Heavy Duty Motive
53.4%$39M
Technology Solutions
37.9%$28M
Material Handling
8.7%$6M
PLUGPlug Power Inc.
FY 2025
Sale Of Electrolyzers
26.5%$188M
Fuel Delivered To Customers
18.8%$133M
Power Purchase Agreements
15.2%$108M
Sale of cryogenic equipment
13.5%$96M
Services Performed On Fuel Cell Systems And Related Infrastructure
13.3%$94M
Sales Of Fuel Cell Systems
7.6%$54M
Sale Of Hydrogen Infrastructure
3.8%$27M
Other (2)
1.4%$10M
BEBloom Energy Corporation
FY 2025
Product
75.6%$1.5B
Service
11.3%$228M
Installation
10.2%$206M
Electricity
3.0%$60M
FCELFuelCell Energy, Inc.
FY 2024
Electricity, Generation
53.8%$172M
Product
34.8%$111M
Advanced Technologies
8.3%$27M
Service
3.1%$10M
LINLinde plc
FY 2025
Americas Segment
45.9%$15.2B
EMEA Segment
25.8%$8.5B
APAC Segment
20.1%$6.7B
Engineering Segment
8.2%$2.7B

BLDP vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs LIN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLINLAGGINGFCEL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — PLUG and BE and LIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 348.7x BLDP's $99M. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBLDP logoBLDPBallard Power Sys…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …LIN logoLINLinde plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$99M$710M$2.4B$170M$34.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$100M-$1.5B$240M-$84M$12.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$91M-$1.6B$6M-$183M$7.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$66M-$2M$233M-$126M$5.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+5.5%+99.8%+31.1%-15.9%+46.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-104.7%+38.1%+8.2%-67.6%+28.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-91.5%-2.3%+0.2%-108.0%+20.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-66.6%-0.3%+9.5%-74.2%+14.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+37.2%+17.6%+130.4%+60.7%+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+59.3%+95.9%+3.3%+65.5%+13.4%
Evenly matched — PLUG and BE and LIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, LIN's 19.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 508.4x.

MetricBLDP logoBLDPBallard Power Sys…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …LIN logoLINLinde plc
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$4.4B$62.2B$646M$228.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$910M$5.4B$62.7B$495M$250.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-15.67x-699.03x-1.66x33.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.123.56x27.67x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.33x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple508.37x19.75x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue13.98x6.14x30.72x4.08x6.73x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.42x78.41x0.43x5.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1087.24x44.97x
LIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. BLDP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBLDP logoBLDPBallard Power Sys…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …LIN logoLINLinde plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-14.6%-124.4%+0.8%-26.8%+17.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-12.6%-64.3%+0.2%-20.1%+8.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-68.8%+10.9%+4.1%-14.0%+11.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-12.3%+18.6%+2.5%-13.8%+13.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955456
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x19.75x3.77x0.20x0.68x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$504M$996M$538M-$151M$21.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$526M$1M$2.5B$295M$5.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$22M$997M$3.0B$144M$27.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-46.37x-36.18x1.05x-30.14x34.52x
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $500 for FCEL. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs LIN's +11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs FCEL's -44.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBLDP logoBLDPBallard Power Sys…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …LIN logoLINLinde plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+75.4%+40.4%+162.1%+50.3%+15.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+291.7%+303.6%+1464.7%+219.0%+11.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2.4%-66.3%+1425.9%-82.9%+39.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-69.5%-86.4%+1013.4%-95.0%+73.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+231.0%+62.2%+934.6%-99.4%+375.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.8%-30.4%+148.0%-44.5%+11.8%
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BLDP and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLDP currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs PLUG's 68.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBLDP logoBLDPBallard Power Sys…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …LIN logoLINLinde plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.27x2.57x3.61x2.91x0.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.86$4.58$302.99$14.30$521.28
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.18$0.69$16.18$3.66$387.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.7%+68.3%+85.4%+85.9%+94.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10080.163.372.664.951.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.4M76.5M10.1M3.8M2.3M
Evenly matched — BLDP and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BLDP as "Hold", PLUG as "Buy", BE as "Buy", FCEL as "Hold", LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.9% upside for PLUG (target: $4) vs -42.1% for BLDP (target: $3). For income investors, LIN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.21% vs FCEL's 1.01%.

MetricBLDP logoBLDPBallard Power Sys…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …LIN logoLINLinde plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.72$3.91$187.56$8.73$539.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts2538311928
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+1.0%+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises026
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00$0.12$6.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+2.0%
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallLinde plc (LIN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BLDP vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs LIN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BLDP or PLUG or BE or FCEL or LIN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ballard Power Systems Inc.

(BLDP) is the stronger pick with 45. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 33. 8x trailing P/E (27. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BLDP or PLUG or BE or FCEL or LIN?

On forward P/E, Linde plc is actually cheaper at 27.

7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BLDP or PLUG or BE or FCEL or LIN?

Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -95.

0% for FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +934. 6% versus FCEL's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BLDP or PLUG or BE or FCEL or LIN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

24β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 1401% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ballard Power Systems Inc. (BLDP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BLDP or PLUG or BE or FCEL or LIN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ballard Power Systems Inc.

(BLDP) is pulling ahead at 45. 0% versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1414. 3% for FuelCell Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BLDP or PLUG or BE or FCEL or LIN?

Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

3% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -80. 6% for BLDP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BLDP or PLUG or BE or FCEL or LIN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Linde plc (LIN) trades at 27.

7x forward P/E versus 123. 6x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 95. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLUG: 24. 9% to $3. 91.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BLDP or PLUG or BE or FCEL or LIN?

In this comparison, LIN (1.

2% yield), FCEL (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. BLDP, PLUG, BE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BLDP or PLUG or BE or FCEL or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

24), 1. 2% yield, +375. 2% 10Y return). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +375. 2%, PLUG: +62. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BLDP and PLUG and BE and FCEL and LIN?

These companies operate in different sectors (BLDP (Industrials) and PLUG (Industrials) and BE (Industrials) and FCEL (Industrials) and LIN (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BLDP is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCEL is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. FCEL, LIN pay a dividend while BLDP, PLUG, BE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BLDP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PLUG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 65%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FCEL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 30%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LIN

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BLDP and PLUG and BE and FCEL and LIN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BLDP: 37.2% · PLUG: 17.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.