Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BLFS vs RGEN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BLFS
BioLife Solutions, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.05B
5Y Perf.+32.2%
RGEN
Repligen Corporation

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.09B
5Y Perf.-4.0%

BLFS vs RGEN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BLFS logoBLFS
RGEN logoRGEN
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & Supplies
Market Cap$1.05B$7.09B
Revenue (TTM)$96M$763M
Net Income (TTM)$-12M$51M
Gross Margin64.6%51.5%
Operating Margin-12.6%8.7%
Forward P/E147.2x63.9x
Total Debt$11M$690M
Cash & Equiv.$566M

BLFS vs RGENLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BLFS
RGEN
StockMay 20May 26Return
BioLife Solutions, … (BLFS)100132.2+32.2%
Repligen Corporation (RGEN)10096.0-4.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BLFS vs RGEN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BLFS and RGEN are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Repligen Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BLFS
BioLife Solutions, Inc.
The Income Pick

BLFS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.67
  • Rev growth 17.0%, EPS growth 43.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.1%
  • 11.4% 10Y total return vs RGEN's 379.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
RGEN
Repligen Corporation
The Value Play

RGEN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (63.9x vs 147.2x)
  • 6.7% margin vs BLFS's -12.6%
  • 1.8% ROA vs BLFS's -3.0%, ROIC 2.2% vs -2.7%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBLFS logoBLFS17.0% revenue growth vs RGEN's 16.4%
ValueRGEN logoRGENLower P/E (63.9x vs 147.2x)
Quality / MarginsRGEN logoRGEN6.7% margin vs BLFS's -12.6%
Stability / SafetyBLFS logoBLFSBeta 1.67 vs RGEN's 1.76, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BLFS logoBLFS-0.9% vs RGEN's -3.6%
Efficiency (ROA)RGEN logoRGEN1.8% ROA vs BLFS's -3.0%, ROIC 2.2% vs -2.7%

BLFS vs RGEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BLFSBioLife Solutions, Inc.
FY 2024
Product
92.4%$76M
Rental Revenue
7.4%$6M
Service
0.2%$160,000
RGENRepligen Corporation
FY 2025
Product
50.0%$738M
Filtration Products
27.3%$403M
Chromatography Products
10.4%$153M
Proteins Products
6.6%$97M
Process Analytics Products
5.5%$81M
Other products
0.2%$3M

BLFS vs RGEN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBLFSLAGGINGRGEN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RGEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

RGEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $763M annually — 7.9x BLFS's $96M. RGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 6.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLFS's -12.6%. On growth, BLFS holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBLFS logoBLFSBioLife Solutions…RGEN logoRGENRepligen Corporat…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$96M$763M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M$155M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$12M$51M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$13M$104M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+64.6%+51.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-12.6%+8.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-12.6%+6.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.3%+13.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.5%+14.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-70.5%+50.0%
RGEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BLFS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricBLFS logoBLFSBioLife Solutions…RGEN logoRGENRepligen Corporat…
Market CapShares × price$1.0B$7.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$7.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-87.00x146.23x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.147.16x63.92x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple52.17x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue10.90x9.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.85x3.38x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF52.12x75.54x
BLFS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

RGEN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

RGEN delivers a 2.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-3 for BLFS. BLFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RGEN's 0.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RGEN scores 7/9 vs BLFS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBLFS logoBLFSBioLife Solutions…RGEN logoRGENRepligen Corporat…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.3%+2.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.0%+1.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.7%+2.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-3.2%+2.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$11M$124M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$566M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$11M$690M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-25.79x2.64x
RGEN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BLFS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BLFS five years ago would be worth $7,155 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,790 for RGEN. Over the past 12 months, BLFS leads with a -0.9% total return vs RGEN's -3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLFS at 4.3% vs RGEN's -7.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBLFS logoBLFSBioLife Solutions…RGEN logoRGENRepligen Corporat…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.0%-23.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-0.9%-3.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+13.5%-19.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.5%-32.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1142.9%+379.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+4.3%-7.0%
BLFS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BLFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BLFS is the less volatile stock with a 1.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RGEN's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricBLFS logoBLFSBioLife Solutions…RGEN logoRGENRepligen Corporat…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.67x1.76x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$29.62$175.77
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.86$109.52
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+73.4%+71.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.355.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded419K909K
BLFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates BLFS as "Buy" and RGEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.7% upside for BLFS (target: $33) vs 33.6% for RGEN (target: $168).

MetricBLFS logoBLFSBioLife Solutions…RGEN logoRGENRepligen Corporat…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$33.00$168.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1723
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

BLFS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). RGEN leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallBioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BLFS vs RGEN: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BLFS or RGEN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, BioLife Solutions, Inc.

(BLFS) is the stronger pick with 17. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 4% for Repligen Corporation (RGEN). Repligen Corporation (RGEN) offers the better valuation at 146. 2x trailing P/E (63. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BLFS or RGEN?

On forward P/E, Repligen Corporation is actually cheaper at 63.

9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BLFS or RGEN?

Over the past 5 years, BioLife Solutions, Inc.

(BLFS) delivered a total return of -28. 5%, compared to -32. 1% for Repligen Corporation (RGEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLFS returned +1143% versus RGEN's +379. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BLFS or RGEN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioLife Solutions, Inc.

(BLFS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 67β versus Repligen Corporation's 1. 76β — meaning RGEN is approximately 5% more volatile than BLFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 33% for Repligen Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BLFS or RGEN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BioLife Solutions, Inc.

(BLFS) is pulling ahead at 17. 0% versus 16. 4% for Repligen Corporation (RGEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Repligen Corporation grew EPS 287. 0% year-over-year, compared to 43. 2% for BioLife Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLFS leads at 8. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BLFS or RGEN?

Repligen Corporation (RGEN) is the more profitable company, earning 6.

6% net margin versus -12. 6% for BioLife Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RGEN leads at 8. 1% versus -12. 6% for BLFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLFS leads at 64. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BLFS or RGEN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Repligen Corporation (RGEN) trades at 63.

9x forward P/E versus 147. 2x for BioLife Solutions, Inc. — 83. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLFS: 51. 7% to $33. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BLFS or RGEN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is BLFS or RGEN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, BioLife Solutions, Inc.

(BLFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1143% 10Y return). Repligen Corporation (RGEN) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BLFS: +1143%, RGEN: +379. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BLFS and RGEN?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BLFS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 324%
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RGEN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BLFS and RGEN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BLFS: 648.6% · RGEN: 14.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.