Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BLMZ vs HRZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
BLMZ vs HRZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $165K | $200M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $255M | $40M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $28M |
| Gross Margin | 28.4% | 18.0% |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $473M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $149M | $106M |
BLMZ vs HRZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harrison Global Hol… (BLMZ) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Horizon Technology … (HRZN) | 100 | 57.6 | -42.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLMZ vs HRZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLMZ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 71.5%, EPS growth -13.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.35, Low D/E 8.2%, current ratio 2.81x
- 71.5% revenue growth vs HRZN's 17.9%
HRZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 27.6%
- 53.2% 10Y total return vs BLMZ's -99.9%
- Beta 0.77, yield 27.6%, current ratio 1.24x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 71.5% revenue growth vs HRZN's 17.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.6% margin vs BLMZ's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs BLMZ's 2.35 | |
| Dividends | 27.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -24.2% vs BLMZ's -99.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.6% ROA vs BLMZ's -8.1%, ROIC -0.2% vs -49.8% |
BLMZ vs HRZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRZN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLMZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $255M annually — 6.4x HRZN's $40M. HRZN is the more profitable business, keeping -6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLMZ's -13.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $255M | $40M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | $19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | $28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$67M | $67M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +18.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.6% | -6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.1% | +141.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +108.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -112.5% | -29.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BLMZ leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $165,187 | $200M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$534,276 | $568M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 4.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 5.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRZN delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-17 for BLMZ. BLMZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRZN's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HRZN scores 5/9 vs BLMZ's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.5% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.1% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -49.8% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.5% | -0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$109M | $368M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $149M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $473M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.16x | 0.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRZN five years ago would be worth $6,859 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for BLMZ. Over the past 12 months, HRZN leads with a -24.2% total return vs BLMZ's -99.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRZN at -10.2% vs BLMZ's -92.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.5% | -26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.2% | -24.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -27.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -31.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +53.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.1% | -10.2% |
Risk & Volatility
HRZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HRZN is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLMZ's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HRZN currently trades 53.7% from its 52-week high vs BLMZ's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.35x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.90 | $8.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $3.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.3% | +53.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.5 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
HRZN is the only dividend payer here at 27.62% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +27.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HRZN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BLMZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
BLMZ vs HRZN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLMZ or HRZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Harrison Global Holdings Inc.
(BLMZ) is the stronger pick with 71. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 9% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) a "Hold" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BLMZ or HRZN?
Over the past 5 years, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) delivered a total return of -31.
4%, compared to -99. 9% for Harrison Global Holdings Inc. (BLMZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HRZN returned +53. 2% versus BLMZ's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BLMZ or HRZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
77β versus Harrison Global Holdings Inc. 's 2. 35β — meaning BLMZ is approximately 207% more volatile than HRZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Harrison Global Holdings Inc. (BLMZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 149% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BLMZ or HRZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Harrison Global Holdings Inc.
(BLMZ) is pulling ahead at 71. 5% versus 17. 9% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation grew EPS 756. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1299. 2% for Harrison Global Holdings Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BLMZ or HRZN?
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the more profitable company, earning -6.
6% net margin versus -100. 5% for Harrison Global Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps -6. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HRZN leads at -4. 0% versus -84. 5% for BLMZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLMZ leads at 30. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BLMZ or HRZN?
In this comparison, HRZN (27.
6% yield) pays a dividend. BLMZ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BLMZ or HRZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
77), 27. 6% yield). Harrison Global Holdings Inc. (BLMZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HRZN: +53. 2%, BLMZ: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BLMZ and HRZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLMZ (Industrials) and HRZN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
HRZN pays a dividend while BLMZ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Dividend Yield > 11.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.