BLMZ
Harrison Global Holdings Inc.
Specialty Business Services
Market Cap$165K
5Y Perf.-99.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BLMZ vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
Asset Management
Market Cap$243M
5Y Perf.-32.5%
BLMZ vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BLMZ | TPVG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $165K | $243M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $255M | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 28.4% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $149M | $20M |
BLMZ vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BLMZ
TPVG
| Stock | Jul 24 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harrison Global Hol… (BLMZ) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 67.5 | -32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLMZ vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TPVG leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Harrison Global Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BLMZ
Harrison Global Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play
BLMZ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 71.5%, EPS growth -13.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.7%
- 71.5% revenue growth vs TPVG's 36.6%
Best for: growth exposure
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
- 93.3% 10Y total return vs BLMZ's -99.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BLMZ | 71.5% revenue growth vs TPVG's 36.6% |
| Quality / Margins | TPVG | 50.6% margin vs BLMZ's -13.6% |
| Stability / Safety | TPVG | Beta 0.83 vs BLMZ's 1.87 |
| Dividends | TPVG | 17.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TPVG | +19.3% vs BLMZ's -99.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TPVG | -1.5% ROA vs BLMZ's -8.1%, ROIC 7.2% vs -49.8% |
BLMZ vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTPVGLAGGINGBLMZ
BLMZHarrison Global Holdi…
1leads
TPVGTriplePoint Venture G…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BLMZMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TPVG3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BLMZ3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TPVG6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TPVG6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TPVG2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLMZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $255M annually — 2.6x TPVG's $97M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLMZ's -13.6%.
| Metric | BLMZHarrison Global H… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $255M | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$67M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.6% | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.1% | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +108.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -112.5% | -2.3% |
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BLMZ leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BLMZHarrison Global H… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $165,187 | $243M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$534,276 | $691M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 4.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
BLMZ leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG delivers a -3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-17 for BLMZ. BLMZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPVG scores 5/9 vs BLMZ's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BLMZHarrison Global H… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.5% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.1% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -49.8% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.5% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$109M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $149M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.16x | -1.02x |
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TPVG five years ago would be worth $8,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for BLMZ. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs BLMZ's -99.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPVG at -1.2% vs BLMZ's -92.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BLMZHarrison Global H… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.5% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.2% | +19.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -13.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +93.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.1% | -1.2% |
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLMZ's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TPVG currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs BLMZ's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BLMZHarrison Global H… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.87x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.90 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.3% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.5 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 504K |
TPVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 17.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | BLMZHarrison Global H… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +17.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TPVG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BLMZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallTriplePoint Venture Growth … (TPVG)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BLMZ vs TPVG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLMZ or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Harrison Global Holdings Inc.
(BLMZ) is the stronger pick with 71. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 36. 6% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BLMZ or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) delivered a total return of -13. 5%, compared to -99. 9% for Harrison Global Holdings Inc. (BLMZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +93. 3% versus BLMZ's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BLMZ or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Harrison Global Holdings Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning BLMZ is approximately 124% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Harrison Global Holdings Inc. (BLMZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BLMZ or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Harrison Global Holdings Inc.
(BLMZ) is pulling ahead at 71. 5% versus 36. 6% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1299. 2% for Harrison Global Holdings Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BLMZ or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -100. 5% for Harrison Global Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -84. 5% for BLMZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BLMZ or TPVG?
In this comparison, TPVG (17.
1% yield) pays a dividend. BLMZ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BLMZ or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 17. 1% yield). Harrison Global Holdings Inc. (BLMZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +93. 3%, BLMZ: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BLMZ and TPVG?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLMZ (Industrials) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
TPVG pays a dividend while BLMZ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BLMZ: 108.4% · TPVG: 36.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.