BMNR vs CLSK

For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 84. 1% for Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR). Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) offers the better valuation at 1. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.

(BMNR) is the cheapest at 1. 7x versus CleanSpark, Inc. at 12. 9x.

Over the past 5 years, Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.

(BMNR) delivered a total return of +58. 1%, compared to -19. 8% for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BMNR returned -4. 5% versus CLSK's -83. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the lower-risk stock at 3. 39β versus Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. 's 4. 17β — meaning BMNR is approximately 23% more volatile than CLSK relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus 84. 1% for Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 877. 7% year-over-year, compared to 262. 3% for CleanSpark, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.

(BMNR) is the more profitable company, earning 57. 2% net margin versus 47. 6% for CleanSpark, Inc. — meaning it keeps 57. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMNR leads at 72. 9% versus 41. 6% for CLSK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLSK leads at 41. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, CLSK (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. BMNR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.

(BMNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BMNR: -4. 5%, CLSK: -83. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (BMNR (Financial Services) and CLSK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.