Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BN vs KKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
BN vs KKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $104.40B | $89.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $77.66B | $19.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.31B | $2.37B |
| Gross Margin | 40.0% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 39.9% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 16.7x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $263.42B | $54.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16.24B | $6M |
BN vs KKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Corporat… (BN) | 100 | 273.1 | +173.1% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 361.5 | +261.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BN vs KKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.57
- Rev growth -9.7%, EPS growth -99.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.57, current ratio 1.14x
KKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs BN's 308.9%
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 16.7x)
- 0.8% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -9.7% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 16.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs KKR's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.57 vs KKR's 1.70 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.5% vs KKR's -13.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs KKR's 0.4% |
BN vs KKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BN vs KKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BN and KKR each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BN is the larger business by revenue, generating $77.7B annually — 4.0x KKR's $19.3B. KKR is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BN's 1.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $77.7B | $19.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $32.1B | $9.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.3B | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.8B | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.0% | +41.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +49.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.1% | -1.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 42.9x trailing earnings, KKR trades at a 100% valuation discount to BN's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BN's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KKR's 20.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $104.4B | $89.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $351.6B | $144.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9999.00x | 42.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.69x | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.53x | 20.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.34x | 4.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KKR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KKR delivers a 3.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $1 for BN. KKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BN's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KKR scores 6/9 vs BN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.59x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $247.2B | $54.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16.2B | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $263.4B | $54.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.64x | 3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BN five years ago would be worth $18,928 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,648 for KKR. Over the past 12 months, BN leads with a +25.5% total return vs KKR's -13.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BN at 30.5% vs KKR's 27.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.1% | -22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.5% | -13.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.1% | +107.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.3% | +76.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +308.9% | +715.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.5% | +27.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BN is the less volatile stock with a 1.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BN currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs KKR's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.57 | $153.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.47 | $82.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.9M | 6.5M |
Analyst Outlook
KKR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BN as "Buy" and KKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.5% upside for KKR (target: $143) vs 17.0% for BN (target: $54). KKR is the only dividend payer here at 0.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $54.40 | $143.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
BN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). KKR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
BN vs KKR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BN or KKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brookfield Corporation (BN) is the stronger pick with -9.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) offers the better valuation at 42. 9x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Corporation (BN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BN or KKR?
On trailing P/E, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) is the cheapest at 42. 9x versus Brookfield Corporation at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, KKR & Co. Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BN or KKR?
Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Corporation (BN) delivered a total return of +89.
3%, compared to +76. 5% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +715. 5% versus BN's +308. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BN or KKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Corporation (BN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
57β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning KKR is approximately 9% more volatile than BN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 159% for Brookfield Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BN or KKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brookfield Corporation (BN) is pulling ahead at -9.
7% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KKR & Co. Inc. grew EPS -28. 7% year-over-year, compared to -99. 8% for Brookfield Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BN or KKR?
KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus 1. 7% for Brookfield Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BN leads at 39. 9% versus 2. 4% for KKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KKR leads at 41. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BN or KKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for Brookfield Corporation — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KKR: 42. 5% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BN or KKR?
In this comparison, KKR (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. BN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BN or KKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield, +715. 5% 10Y return). Brookfield Corporation (BN) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KKR: +715. 5%, BN: +308. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BN and KKR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
KKR pays a dividend while BN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.